posted on Oct, 8 2003 @ 08:44 PM
Clearly, one of the most critical questions of the twenty-first century concerns why the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were not
prevented. As I outline below, there are numerous aspects regarding the official stories about September 11th which do not fit with known facts, which
contradict each other, which defy common sense, and which indicate a pattern of misinformation and coverup. The reports coming out of Washington do
very little to alleviate these concerns.
For example, the Congressional report released on July 25, 2003 by a joint panel of House and Senate intelligence committees concluded that 9/11
resulted in C.I.A. and F.B.I. "lapses." While incompetence is frightening enough given a $40 billion budget, it is simply not consistent with known
facts. It is consistent with the reports from other government scandals such has the Iran Contra Affair which produced damage control and cover up but
not answers to the more probing questions. But perhaps a comparison to Watergate is more apropos since we now have twenty-eight pages of this report,
which the Bush Administration refuses to release. The report from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is believable unless you are
seriously interested in the truth. Under more careful scientific scrutiny, it does not answer some very important questions.
-This is an excerpt from the following link about 9/11 and the Bush Administration: