AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on Oct, 8 2003 @ 08:18 PM
link   
OPENING STATEMENT

Every news story you are about to review in this comprehensive research paper is true and easily verifiable. This investigation represents 10 months of careful study, research, analysis, source verification and logical deduction. Every event and quote presented here is 100% accurate. There are over 100 detailed footnotes which I encourage, no, urge, readers to explore and verify for themselves. This Internet version will allow users to obtain instant verification for each and every footnote by clicking on the links. Due to the fact that well organized efforts are under way to suppress these facts, some of these news links are mysteriously disappearing even as we speak. Fortunately, this information has all been transcribed by many web users and is has therefore been preserved from the censors. These footnote searches will take you directly to the news sites of many well known established media organizations throughout the world as well as opening up doors to a world of knowledge and information that has been concealed from you. With just a little common sense and a few clicks of a mouse, the Internet now enables anyone with an ounce of curiosity to become a Sherlock Holmes.

Here is the rest of the article:
www.libertyforum.org...




posted on Oct, 8 2003 @ 08:27 PM
link   
Interesting.

I thought when I read your title, Ocelot, that this was about the citizen-led Truth Commission to follow up the Congressional Enquiry which was an exercise in stonewalling.

Good post. I hope it proves useful in part to help cataloguing ATS Research activity in selected topic areas arising from events before and after 9/11.



posted on Oct, 8 2003 @ 08:44 PM
link   
Clearly, one of the most critical questions of the twenty-first century concerns why the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were not prevented. As I outline below, there are numerous aspects regarding the official stories about September 11th which do not fit with known facts, which contradict each other, which defy common sense, and which indicate a pattern of misinformation and coverup. The reports coming out of Washington do very little to alleviate these concerns.

For example, the Congressional report released on July 25, 2003 by a joint panel of House and Senate intelligence committees concluded that 9/11 resulted in C.I.A. and F.B.I. "lapses." While incompetence is frightening enough given a $40 billion budget, it is simply not consistent with known facts. It is consistent with the reports from other government scandals such has the Iran Contra Affair which produced damage control and cover up but not answers to the more probing questions. But perhaps a comparison to Watergate is more apropos since we now have twenty-eight pages of this report, which the Bush Administration refuses to release. The report from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is believable unless you are seriously interested in the truth. Under more careful scientific scrutiny, it does not answer some very important questions.

-This is an excerpt from the following link about 9/11 and the Bush Administration: www.informationclearinghouse.info...





 
0

log in

join