It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PaddyInf
Originally posted by skippytjc
Originally posted by Teknikal
This will probably be closed but I would say the best Main Battle tanks in the world are
#1 Challenger 2
#2 Leopard 2
#3 Leclerc
#4 Merkava
#5 T-90
No doubt peoples opinion will differ and I suspect some will froth at the mouth I have not included the Abrams.
Are you nuts? Baed on what? A stat sheet?
Cold hard FACT: The M1 Abrams has the best ACTUAL BATTLE record of any tank in the history of modern combat. Not one tank on your list even comes close is actual combat performance.
This post has been done so many times its silly. I dont have the energy to post the links to the REAL STATS on combat performance, look up an old thread.
You guys can SPECULATE all you want, but actual fighting record in real live combat is what counts, and no tank has a better record than the Abrams. FACT.
Always makes me chuckle when I see these threads, they tend to be filled with Americans quoting stats about the superiority of the M1, usually taken from American sources. Vagabond has the right idea - horses for courses.
Can't say I like this type of thread, it brings nothing to the forum.
Originally posted by urmomma158
russian tanks are what im scared off due to their armnament superiority
russian SAMS are better
Originally posted by WestPoint23
In my oppinion I would say the best battle tank in the world right now is the M1A2 SEP with the Challenger 2 in a close second.
“We are not converting all the M1A2s into SEP,” Szydloski noted. A few years from now, the 1st Cavalry Division, 4th Infantry Division and 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment will be the only ones to have the SEP, he said.
The US Army planned to procure a total of 1150 M1A2 SEP tanks but the US Army has decided to cancel future production of the M1A2 SEP from FY2004.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Originally posted by urmomma158
russian tanks are what im scared off due to their armnament superiority
I tread lightly on this point because I've already mentioned the lack of realism in testing, but in test firings the T-80 couldn't kill the Leo2A4 at ranges over 1200 meters. That doesn't exactly scare the hell out of me.
russian SAMS are better
Slightly off topic, but I'll take the bait. Which Russian SAM to you put forward as being superior? Say S-300, I double-dog dare you. They designed it as a clone of the patriot.
Yes, the Russians appear to be getting ahead of us in ramjet missiles courtesy of several years of strategic complacency in the white house after the cold war (and I'm not so sure that's 100% over). Yes the current forces are not that inequal. Yes we need to take Russia and China seriously and keep developing. No they're not going to slaughter us. It also bears mentioning that America has this nifty habit of just sitting on new hardware and not telling anyone. The SR-71 was a senior-citizen in aircraft years before we were privy to its existence.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
The answer is obvious, the Challenger 2 has the longest recorded kill at 5km.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by urmomma158
alrite to end this thread lets comapre the top tanks from the USa,Britain,Russia, israel,and china we will compare armnament,firing range,armor,defense,technology etc ok so everyone please give a good comaprison heres what i have ina rmor penetration and the challengers max range isnt 5km its 205 miles a mil aint 2 km. please indstead of opinions e need facts.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
It's hardly "battle", but I would say the Merk is fairly well combat tested...
It all depends on what you consider combat
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
The Challenger 2 tank has an operational range of 400 miles over land and 250 miles cross-country.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Hmm, I think I confused the two again, my bad, the British do everything in kilometers, it's km people, not miles.
It's hard distinguishing distances when you use km, miles, and nautical miles.
Shattered OUT...