Faked moon landings on next Friday's show?

Vitalij

What is your major malfunction??

My quote addressed your attack on my understanding of your claptrap that:
man on moon = new plants on Earth.
This contention was entirely part of your (by now obviously ridiculous) argument. If you too now do not believe it, then welcome back to planet Earth my friend.

You selected this part of the relevant post to attack me, not I.

In the same post I also said:



I note that you did not address this. You see the point here is, when man stepped on the moon, if new plants were created you would have to inspect
all species on all of the planet to be sure. Even then how would you know they were a new species or one newly discovered. My suspicion is that if your crazy contention is right and new species were discovered then you would probably say that they already existed and were undiscovered. This is because of your total arrogance and belief in your ridiculous notion. I commend you sir on your continual defence of the indefensible..

It is you sir having the difficulty grasping information and some of that information you imparted. If you cannot understand what you are saying, what chance the rest of us??
You have already insulted my person, my intelligence and I believe tried to goad me into some sort of vitriolic response. It is you sir who claim to be educated (a degree in dressmaking, physics or hanging around gentleman's lavatories is not relevant here, nor does a string of letters after a name make an argument any more or less truthful....there are plenty of nutters with degrees, I can think of one...can you Vitalij?). Whatever your educational level you hardly seem to have a objective viewpoint. So that would kind of rule out peer review in any research you undertook.

Also, it has been my experience that people who claim to have some sort of contact with inter-dimensionality/ spirit/ cosmic consciousness whatever, are usually benevolent, altruistic and exist for the benefit of mankind. Whereas you my dear friend seem to spend your time slagging off this mentally inferior human. However humble a being I am, I can accept my faults can you accept yours. Oh but you have none do you, conduit of the cosmic consciousness. Yes I am little faulty I am a human being. That's what we are imperfect, even you IMHO.
Note I am a human, not a bio-robot, not bi-sexual robot not even a Robbie the Robot......."DANGER Vitalij Robinson DANGER. The cosmic consciousness is approaching".
Go home your tea is ready. Playtime is over.

I cant wait to see what you come up with next.

Till then my friend TTFN.

AgentSmith



This is exactly my point. I am glad someone else could see it. You put it a little better than I though. But as my friend Vitalij knows I am a bit of a fool and uneducated

I too would like to know the mechanism / system that would cause this effect, if it were an effect.
Vitalij said something about calling it ESP for simplicity (must be for me then!). Has he called it this because it is the nearest term he has in English for this cosmological effect? Or is it because he doesn't understand it himself? Or the cosmological consciousness has not told him yet?

This has indeed been an entertaining thread. The warm up act is great.

Bye now

okay i got this now man never went to the moon because no new plant or sudden change of plant life happened here. alrighty then in 1998 i think dont hold me to it the date may be wrong im going on memory now, in papua a plant was found that was not recorded ever before hey presto priase the lord i have answerd the riddle we went to the moon i can prove it with the plant theory.
ok im ready to be attacked

terrylm

Case proven M'Lord.

Thing is, would there be a different species for each Astronaut that stepped there? Or is this too simplistic?
If so does the Lunar-nauts personality, demeanor etc dictate the type of plant to be expected?? A new crocus perhaps for Armstrong, a Lupin for Aldrin?

I must confess that I am aware that species die out and new species are discovered a fair old bit. One of my problems with Vitalij's hypothesis(?) is how do you know that they are new species and not some previously undiscovered plant?
Even if you can believe his hypothesis, he could always claim that the new species are only an older undiscovered species. So man did not land on the moon any way.

Just a thought. Suppose you accept that new discovered species are evidence of something happening on the moon. Surely the quantity of newly discovered species annually would mean more than 12 men landed there?

Also as your post indicates, plants have been discovered in the 24 or so years since the last landing. Is there a time lag between cause and effect? Or did someone else land in the year of the discovery?

IMHO Vitalij's hypothesis is bunkum. It is good that he has something to believe in though. Keeps his mind from less dangerous things.

If you have read this thread from the start you may note the attacks by Vitalij on myself, I hope you are prepared for the same. But wait a mo. Your using his hypothesis to prove man has been to the moon.

Oh dear. I can see a circuit overload. Over to you my friend Vitalij.

I believe in lunarnauts and I now more so believe in lunar nutz boom boom!!

[edit on 12-5-2006 by terrylm]
yes i have read from the start and i am ready for the same and yes i did use his hypothesis to show him he may be wrong in his staement
I also think his attack on you was not called for, the statement i have a degree do you is a sign of i have nothing cop this this well i dont have mutch schoolin and no deggrees to banter around but i think i can tell bulltish when i hear it now im not trying to burn you vitalij but i have been folowing this we landed oh no we didnt and this one is the best one i have ever heard for the no we dint land on the mooners
now you may have some ability in the psycic world but to extend it that far i dont think so sorry
also why is when you go to a psycic they dont know what you want untill you tell them
ease up people it only a little joke wow im gunna get it now arnt I

[edit on 12-5-2006 by terrylm]

Hey all...

A thought just occurred to me (yes even the mentally inferior have an occasional thought). Another bit of "evidence" to the US landings being fake often brought up is:
"The Soviets had first man, woman, dog, satellite etc......if they were so advanced how could the US possibly not just catch up but actually overtake them?".

A quick Google will tell you that the N1 program failed that is why they did not go.
It is reasonable to believe that if the Soviets really thought that the USA had not got there (and lets face it they were probably the ones on the whole planet who would really have loved to disprove it) they would not have cancelled their program, however risky, and found some way to discredit the US claims (whether the "free" world would have believed them would not matter to them, the USA would be a little emasculated with the Soviets winking at them "We know.").

I believe it was not for the good of mankind they went. It was to demonstrate "Can do!", "Up yours!" and "How do you like those onions!". Well from he political level anyway.
What happened when they got there? Who knows...cameras don't lie and the helmet visors are too dark to read their lines:

"Okay Neil darling...Lights, camera....action...."

"...small step for man a.......prompt"

I watched a video and an interview of this fellow over the weekend. If anyone believes this stuff you wont after watching this load of - oops - nearly forgot my manners there. My wife was not even interested and she was flaming the guy for being so dumb. I still have a bridge up for sale

The US Government has acknowledged and the mystery is solved!

Kubrick made a shoot!

Watch this!!!

-Did we land on the Moon?

Unbelievable documentary....Do you talking about this video above?

[edit on 1-7-2006 by Amon_Ra]