Awacs+M1A2+THAADand or MEADS+F/A 22 vs S400+SU 37+AWACS +T90

Originally posted by Serbian_SPIRIT
Also i am talking about trust vectoring control on Terminator Su-37 (not S-37 or Su-47 Berkut) it is 360 degrees.

read your own link

The new feature of the super-manoeuvrable Su-37 fighter is the two-dimensional thrust vector control engines
[Source]http://www.geocities.com/flex_cs/SU37[/source]

Justin

That link is wrong, the Su-37 Terminator does have 3-Dimensional Thrust Vectoring as compared to the F-22's 2-dimensional Thrust Vectoring.

extrmely short answers are discouraged i got 50 points off just remeber that back to the topic now THAAd vs S400

[edit on 12-3-2006 by urmomma158]

Originally posted by urmomma158
extrmely short answers are discouraged i got 50 points off just remeber that back to the topic now THAAd vs S400

[edit on 12-3-2006 by urmomma158]

Well it really depends on what your posting, if it is a short in-coherent answer, then yes, it is discouraged.

Then again, so are "This weapon" VS "That Weapon" Threads.

Shattered OUT...

Originally posted by urmomma158
extrmely short answers are discouraged i got 50 points off just remeber that

gutted

back to the topic now THAAd vs S400

The regiment is expected to become combat ready later in 2006 at a location near Moscow
www.missilethreat.com...

As i said before the s-400 isnt yet in service.

I think maybe the moderators should close this thread it started off against the rules and has become pretty much pointless.

Justin

Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
That link is wrong, the Su-37 Terminator does have 3-Dimensional Thrust Vectoring as compared to the F-22's 2-dimensional Thrust Vectoring.

Yup...

MKI 3d TVC:

2D

2D

The 3rd pivot:

Urmomman you ask me about some tech detail's of Su-47.
This is NOT official.


Sukhoi S-37
Length 74.1ft (22.6m)
Wingspan 54.8ft (16.7m)
Takeoff weight (normal) 52,910lb (24000kg)
Takeoff weight (max.) 77,160lb (35000kg)
Powerplant 2 x AL-41F 175kN ea.
Temporary 2 x AL-31F 123 kN
Maximum speed 1,080-1,188 kts (2000-2200 km/h)
Cruise speed 810-918 kts (1500-1700 km/h)
Supersonic range N/A
Subsonic range Over 2,484 miles (4000km+)
g-limit N/A

I hope you are satisfield.

P.S.
Tech details of MIG 1.44

Mikoyan 1.44
Length 71.2ft (21.7m)
Wingspan 53.8ft (16.4m)
Takeoff weight (normal) 61,728lb (28000kg)
Takeoff weight (max.) 77,160lb (35000kg)
Powerplant 2 x AL-41F 175kN ea.
Temporary 2 x AL-31F 123 kN
Maximum speed 1,350 kts (2500 km/h)
Cruise speed 810-918 kts (1500-1700 km/h)
Supersonic range 1,553 miles (2500 km)
Subsonic range 2,795 miles (4500 km)
g-limit 9

So why does the above matter

They were both technology demonstrators and so should be far better than any mass produced aircraft because they are loaded with the absolute latest technology instead of technology a few years old.

Both the s-37 and the mig 1.44 would get kicked off by the f-22 because the f-22 v's s-37 and mig 1.44 would be 183 aircraft against 2.

Justin

edit:spelling


[edit on 12-3-2006 by justin_barton3]

Not only that, but it's something that cannot be ignored, the F-22A is the most advanced and most capable fighter on the planet. For the time being.

And this is true, you just can't ignore everything that the Raptor is. Maybe soon another country will come out with something better than the Raptor, and then America wouldn't be as far ahead as alot of people seem to think. I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of Balanced Powers, what one country has, another one should have too, just tihnk about it, if I have nukes, and you have nukes, are we going to pick a fight with each other? Is jingoism really alive like it used to be?

No one country would dare go to war with another one of equal power, that way no one wins, and no wars of mass porportions start, and thus the world is hung together, kinda scary though, the world being held together by a single tether and cord.

Shattered OUT...

Originally posted by Serbian_SPIRIT
Urmomman you ask me about some tech detail's of Su-47.
This is NOT official.


Sukhoi S-37
Length 74.1ft (22.6m)
Wingspan 54.8ft (16.7m)
Takeoff weight (normal) 52,910lb (24000kg)
Takeoff weight (max.) 77,160lb (35000kg)
Powerplant 2 x AL-41F 175kN ea.
Temporary 2 x AL-31F 123 kN
Maximum speed 1,080-1,188 kts (2000-2200 km/h)
Cruise speed 810-918 kts (1500-1700 km/h)
Supersonic range N/A
Subsonic range Over 2,484 miles (4000km+)
g-limit N/A

I hope you are satisfield.

P.S.
Tech details of MIG 1.44

Mikoyan 1.44
Length 71.2ft (21.7m)
Wingspan 53.8ft (16.4m)
Takeoff weight (normal) 61,728lb (28000kg)
Takeoff weight (max.) 77,160lb (35000kg)
Powerplant 2 x AL-41F 175kN ea.
Temporary 2 x AL-31F 123 kN
Maximum speed 1,350 kts (2500 km/h)
Cruise speed 810-918 kts (1500-1700 km/h)
Supersonic range 1,553 miles (2500 km)
Subsonic range 2,795 miles (4500 km)
g-limit 9

got anthing official? besides they're experimental technology demonstrators for real aircraft such as the Su 35 and the F/A 22has a much higher kill ratio than the Su 35 10:1(done by a eurpean)

Originally posted by ShatteredSkies

Originally posted by urmomma158
extrmely short answers are discouraged i got 50 points off just remeber that back to the topic now THAAd vs S400

[edit on 12-3-2006 by urmomma158]

Well it really depends on what your posting, if it is a short in-coherent answer, then yes, it is discouraged.

Then again, so are "This weapon" VS "That Weapon" Threads.

Shattered OUT...

tihs weapon vs this weapon arent discouraged its this country vs this country and what is your favorite gn etc.. thats what the super moderator said

Originally posted by justin_barton3

Originally posted by urmomma158
extrmely short answers are discouraged i got 50 points off just remeber that

gutted

back to the topic now THAAd vs S400

The regiment is expected to become combat ready later in 2006 at a location near Moscow
www.missilethreat.com...

As i said before the s-400 isnt yet in service.

I think maybe the moderators should close this thread it started off against the rules and has become pretty much pointless.

Justin

no ur gettin it worong its this country vs this country i said that before thats ecatly wha the modrator said the reason why is because ithis ection is for weapon ssytems not countries bcause people were going off topic and getting to personal and not talkin gabout weapon systems

[edit on 12-3-2006 by urmomma158]

I'm just curious as to how you can possibly give that ratio, since neither aircraft have seen combat, the Su-35 and F-22A have yet to be deployed in any real combat sortie.

Just because some guy FAR away says it, doesn't make it true.

And I don't think that the S-400 and THAAD is a very good comparison, as to the S-400 has yet to see service.

Right now, like everyone else has said, this is PURE speculation, there are no real numbers out there, only speculation and test results.

And I have been here long enough and seen enough threads locked and enough members banned for "This" Vs. "That" threads. Any sort of "This" Vs. "That" threads are not encouraged because they don't justify anything, nothing real is gained from them, only frustration, thread lockings, and member bans. I really hope this is the last we hear on the "This" Vs. "That" thread complications.

Shattered OUT...

Originally posted by urmomma158
got anthing official? besides they're experimental technology demonstrators for real aircraft such as the Su 35 and the F/A 22has a much higher kill ratio than the Su 35 10:1(done by a eurpean)

The simulation you mention is from 1996. It is nothing else than that: a simulation based on WHAT WAS KNOWN about the competing aircraft back then. It is not a viable source of information now because the planes, especially those that hadn´t even left the prototype stage in 1996, have changed much since then.

Originally posted by urmomma158
no ur gettin it worong its this country vs this country i said that before thats ecatly wha the modrator said the reason why is because ithis ection is for weapon ssytems not countries bcause people were going off topic and getting to personal and not talkin gabout weapon systems

The rule is EXACTLY against threads like this: arbitrary comparison of hearsay "facts" and opinions, it has nothing to do with nationality. One reason for this is that the true specs of military hardware, especially groundbreaking new types, are CONFIDENTIAL, and they will certainly not be revealed so as us Forum goers can slug numbers around to prove a point -> so basically these discussions comparing the capabilities to determine which is BETTER are pretty pointless.

So unless a "Vs." thread has a twist that makes it discussable, like saying which equipment would be the best for a specific task or under a specific circumstance, ie logistics, cost effectivity etc. , or if it introduces some really new information, it is pure opinion.

As a sidenote, please consider writing slower

[edit on 12/3/2006 by Lonestar24]

Originally posted by Daedalus3
MKI 3d TVC:

.

Its only 2D
"The nozzles of the MKI are capable of deflecting 32 degrees in the horizontal plane and 15 degrees in the vertical plane. This is done by angling them inwards by 15 degrees inwards, which produces a cork-screw effect and thus enhancing the turning capability of the aircraft."
vayu-sena.tripod.com...

All Posters Read This!
Please could members refrain from starting threads that are based around:
what is your favourite gun
who would win if the ??? and ??? went to war with each other
who has the best army/navy/airforce/secret service........
etc etc ...
This forum is for information about Military weapons technology past, present, and future.

*thread closed*