It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


A Reason for Breaking the One Week Covenant?

page: 1
<<   2  3 >>

log in


posted on Mar, 10 2006 @ 09:51 AM

And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolate, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate
(Daniel 9:27 New America Standard Bible)

I'm sure that most of you are familiar with the previous passage. It has to be one of the most famous passages of Bible prophecy. According to this passage the Antichrist will renew a covenant with a lot of people for a period of 7 years. For those that might be confused, a week = a week of years. (Research if you're unsure of this) So we will have a re-newing of an agreement for a 7 year period, and that agreement involves Israel.

Enter the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) Look at the map on their home page. Looks just like the old Roman empire. If that wasn't freaky enough we already had an agreement that hasn't worked out so well. The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership for Peace (Euro-Med) was started back in 1995 but seems to not be working out so well. Now the EU wishes to use the ENP to replace the Euro-Med. I guess you could say that the ENP was confirming or renewing a covenant. The real kicker is when you read how the ENP is funded by the EU's 7 year budget.

So starting in 2007 (Next EU budget cycle) Israel, along with other signers of the ENP, will be existing peacefully together. Probably making daisy chains and holding hands and singing. It all sounds so good and...peaceful. What on earth would mess up this peaceful union of all these nations? You'll never believe what is supposed to happen half-way through this 7 year period. It appears that in 2010 (the mid-way point of the ENP) Israel has decided to finally make it's borders permanent.

Israel to Draw West Bank Borders by 2010

JERUSALEM - Israel will draw its final borders by 2010, acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said in an interview published Thursday, for the first time setting a deadline for what is expected to be a unilateral large-scale West Bank pullback.

Olmert's agenda also includes a plan for an expanded Jerusalem that alarms Palestinians, connecting the West Bank's largest settlement to the disputed city with new Jewish housing. Jerusalem and its environs would also fall within the permanent borders, as would the West Bank's Jordan Valley on the frontier with Jordan, which Olmert characterized as a "security border."

Now what would upset the balance of things any more than Israel calling dibs on the city of Jerusalem? I can't think of anything that would stir up the middle-east more than declaring that the city of Jerusalem belongs to Israel forever. The fact that this is planned for the mid-point of the new 7 year ENP makes it pretty interesting. Remember that this was all predicted about 2400 years ago. It was predicted that Jerusalem would be the center of the world's attention. If this doesn't raise your eyebrows, nothing will.

Of course it could be a complete coincidence, but it doesn't hurt to keep an eye on the situation.

What's Happening 2010 - Herb Peters

[edit on 10-3-2006 by dbates]

posted on Mar, 10 2006 @ 12:56 PM
Ok, now you have freaked me well and truely....

I spent about a week getting all this together, andding and deleting parts i wanted to post...and on the evening I come to post it...Im beaten to it!!!


I was real concerend when I started to dig into Sharons border plans including some highly volatile areas ie Jerusalem and jordan Hill.. but you hit the nail on the head.

If this doesn't make peopl sit up and think I doubt much will!

Nice post...

posted on Mar, 10 2006 @ 04:24 PM

Originally posted by MadGreebo
I spent about a week getting all this together, andding and deleting parts i wanted to post...and on the evening I come to post it...Im beaten to it!!!

Feel free to and your input to the situation. One little bit could open a door to another line of thought. By the way it looks as if Ehud Olmert has a good chance of winning the seat as the next Prime Minister.

posted on Apr, 7 2006 @ 01:42 PM
News flash for those of you who are keeping track of things. The next (And possibly last) 7 year budget has now been approved. There was some debate about if it was going to pass, but it did. Not only did they pass the budget, they increased it by €4 billion. Talk about overkill! Get it? Armageddon....overkill.

Seriously, this is interesting and of course the ENP was accepted along with the rest of the loot. It actually picked up an extra €400 million in funding. Not to shabby. Well, that's enough blabbing for now. I'll let you read about it for yourself.

2007-2013 Financial Perspective

At the end of a marathon seven-hour meeting on Tuesday night Parliament's negotiating team agreed a deal with Austrian Council Presidency on the Financial Perspective for 2007-2013.

An extra €4 billion over and above the figure decided by the European Council in December will be allocated to programmes regarded as priorities by MEPs.

So, the world doesn't end in 2012. Still, don't get too cozy. Remember all the plagues and stuff that pop up between now and then.

[edit on 7-4-2006 by dbates]

posted on Apr, 13 2006 @ 10:13 AM
Oddly enought the EU has a self-imposed goal of getting it's security forces ready for instant action by 2010. Really? 2010? *Scratches head* If I remember correctly that's half-way through their next 7 year budget or about 3 1/2 years into this 7 year period. Of course this could all be speculation, but still I think it's interesting.

Hitting the Helsinki Headline Goal
EU member states have been working towards meeting the so-called Helsinki Headline Goal. This has required developing the necessary military capabilities to be able by next year to deploy, within 60 days, a force of up to 60,000 troops

Interesting, but what missions are these troops going to be supporting? Read on for more information.

EU-led, crisis-management operations encompass all military missions with the exception of collective defence

With the exception of territories inside the European Union, such missions are possible whenever and wherever politically decided.

So right away we notice that these missions that the EU is preparing for are not defensive missions. That is, these troops are going to be deployed to enforce the EU's will in other countries. The EU will evidently spot an issue that it thinks it needs to step into and then will insert 60,000 troops into the situation to make sure that things go their way. Wether or not this is a good idea depends on who's running the show.

Speaking of that, who exactly would be calling the shots in these operations? What European leader is tasked with making these decsions? Ah! I think I see the answer at the bottom of the first paragraph.

many capability shortfalls that have to be addressed to ensure that the European Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy has teeth.

You can read all about the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) on their own website. While on that page I noticed a link to the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Looks like he's the guy that makes the big decisions. Let's see who this is. *Click*

"Welcome to the Homepage of Javier Solana"

Well, no suprises there. Not only is he the head of the CFSP, he's also the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union. You know that the CFSP already has their foot in the door in Palestine and Israel. It's the EU Police Mission in the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS). No, really. I'm not making this stuff up. See for yourself.

[edit on 13-4-2006 by dbates]

posted on Apr, 13 2006 @ 11:37 AM
this is creepy, i have heard other theories of javier solana possibly being the a.c.
but whats more disturbing is the timeline the bible lays out and the planned events that will apparrently coincide with that timeline. but there is one passage thaT comes to mind tho i cant remember which book/verse/chapter i read it from "he who controls jerusalem @ the end of days shall rule the world" i remember that from a line in the movie "The Omega Code 2" so I'm not sure if thats even a part of scripture.

posted on Apr, 24 2006 @ 11:30 AM
This timing seems to be dead on, the more I research it. Something to think about is how many of God's historical plans were carried out in sequences of '40' (40 days 40 nights, 40 years etc).

This year, June 7, 2006 (day after 06/06/06 might I add) marks the start of the 40th year after the times of the gentiles was fulfilled on June 7, 1967.

Then you have Jesus' parable of the fig tree that isn't fruitful spoken in reference to the tower(present day WTC maybe?) in Siloam falling and killing 18 people. It doesn't bear for three years (2001-2004). After the three it's fertilized and left alone for another (2005). The following year (2006) it's either cut down or harvested depending on whether it bears fruit.

Seems as though this year will be something special indeed.

posted on Apr, 27 2006 @ 05:00 PM
Some more interesting stuff to add:

Ok the next Feast of the Beast is perfect timing to be the beast's final ceremony (2010).

Prince Charles and the Luciferian nation of Israel will both be '66' years old at the end of this thing (2014). This could very well be the date they expect to have conquered Jesus Christ and ring in their luciferian 'New Age' which of course is part of their 'blindness' and will never happen.

On March 6, 1996, Prince Charles announced that he and his sons had received their ID Chip Implants. 6666 days later falls directly on 6/6/2014 (one could then see the numbers 666,666 in that pattern).

I'm thinking this is a little beyond coincidence at this point.

[edit More Info]

It seems as though there is a fine possibility that the 91 day(13 Week) War (WWIII) will fall between 6/6 and 9/5-7(Marriage to the Beast Ceremony). June 6th to September 5th is precisely 91 days.

[edit on 27-4-2006 by WiseSheep]

posted on Apr, 28 2006 @ 07:37 AM

Originally posted by dbates
So, the world doesn't end in 2012.

No. But if that crumbling comet hits on May 25th like some people
are speculating ... it could be very messy here for a while. Ya'
might want to keep an eye on that .... it's getting interesting.
A major world disaster brings the anti-christ out to bring the
world 'together' and for a false peace for 3 1/2 years. That
false peace would end around the end of 2010 or the start
of 2011.

posted on May, 24 2006 @ 11:01 AM
Don't know if anyone has thought of this yet, but here's more support for 2010 being the mid point maybe?

9/11/1990 - 9/11/2001 = 11 years

9/11/2001 - 9/11/2010 = 9 years

911-119 mirror

In no way would this be exact timing but 9/11/2010 +/- 1260 days would give you from 3/31/2007 to 2/22/2014.

posted on Jun, 9 2006 @ 09:40 PM
Hey im new to this forum but and am mostly in it for the NWO and prophecy news. Anyway I think this is a great post. A few months ago I was looking into who was the top dog in the EU but didnt really come up with anything.

Thanks for all your hard work dude. I think there is alot of good valid stuff here. Its pretty scary hearing that this Javier dude will be in controll of most of europes millitary..
And the other thing that really rocked my boat was the whole timing factor of the 7 year peace treaty. Add to that Isreal and Ehud's plan to take jerusulem in 2010 then yeah we difinately need to start getting scared.

Also I wanted to do a quick dig on this Javier chap. Dunno if its been posted b4 but I just thought Id mention his name translates to mean "Enlightened Sun" could be nothing but yeah that seemed kinda freaky to me.

*Profanity Edit

[edit on 11-7-2006 by dbates]

posted on Jul, 11 2006 @ 10:22 AM
Found some more fitting and interesting (to say the least) dates here.

The basis is on this little dinner that Charles and George had on 11/2/2005. I just can't seem to think this was just some ordinary vacation to the white house to say howdy.

Go forward 333 days from 11/2/2005 and you land on 10/1/2006. Go forward 91 days from 10/1 and land on 12/31. Just in time for 1/1/2007.

Now checkout this 8/22 date that's sprung up.

Step back 40 days from 10/1 and land on 8/22. From 8/22, go forward 20 days (8+2+2+2+0+0+6=20) and land on 9/11 and forward another 20 of course back to 10/1.

From 11/2/2005 to 6/6/2006 you'll find 216 (6x6x6) days and from 6/6 to 8/22 you'll find 77 days (2 months and 16 days (216)).

I don't know what kind of odds are involved in this, but it's looking plausible other than the ENP not quite fitting the bill.

posted on Jul, 11 2006 @ 10:36 AM
I'm not sure that adding and subtracting dates from each other can be used for any real purpose. Other than some exact amounts given, such as 7 years, and 3 and a half years, we don't have any guide on dates and timelines. I don't believe you can rule out any date yet. I just think it's interesting that the ENP is founded on a 7 year budget. One of the only hard figures we're given. This may turn out to be nothing, but It's worth keeping an eye on.

On a related note, has anyone been keeping up with the 2010 date for all the trade agreements to be inacted? My contribution in this thread is a good place to start.

North American Union!!! Bush's Real Agenda???

It looks as if it could be a plan to merge all the world markets into one giant mish-mash. Then all you need is one person to take over and control it all. Slightly off topic, but then again same subject. What's with this 2010 date that keeps turning up all the time? You know that the International Space Station is supposed to be completed by 2010, the shuttles are scheduled to be retired, and lots and lots more.

[edit on 11-7-2006 by dbates]

posted on Jul, 11 2006 @ 11:16 AM

Originally posted by dbates
I'm not sure that adding and subtracting dates from each other can be used for any real purpose.

Sure they possibly could be because the ones planning these events leave numeric "tags" all in their work. Sort of a "hey look what I did and got away with." type of thing.

Uncovering their plans may make them scurry back into their holes and make new ones, discarding the old. Sooner than later their plan will be allowed to happen because the great restrainer will be taken out of their way.

Its just a matter of when, that's the shady part. :/

posted on Jul, 18 2006 @ 07:23 AM
Speaking of a the One Week Covenant. Did you catch what Israeli Prime Minister Olmert said yesterday? I understood the word covenant is used to describe an agreement, but didn't expect to see the word used exactly as it was. Talk about literal. It doesn't get more clear than this. Now let's see who steps in to arrange this covenant. Any guesses who that might be? *cough...Solana...cough*

Olmert: We seek a covenant of peace

[edit on 18-7-2006 by dbates]

posted on Jul, 18 2006 @ 09:06 AM
*Applause* for putting together this great thread. Not much to say on my own, but I appreciate what you are laying out before my eyes.

posted on Jul, 18 2006 @ 09:15 AM

Originally posted by worldwatcher
*Applause* for putting together this great thread. Not much to say on my own, but I appreciate what you are laying out before my eyes.

I agree thanks for showing me this thread very sobering look at the way this is unfolding so shockingly

posted on Jul, 18 2006 @ 09:16 AM
Its Solana no question

posted on Jul, 18 2006 @ 10:53 AM
Don't get too dead set on Solana. His power will have to be handed over to someone else. He CAN'T be the one that breaks the covenant mid-way and claims to be God in the rebuilt temple.

Hmm, my question would be, can this fit the prophecies? Does the exact same man have to sign the covenant that he breaks? OR Does it mean the same entity (EU) and the little horn spring up afterwards (during the first 1260 days)?

Solana is an attention getter, but I can't see an ounce of evidence he is it and the most fitting (the number of his name) doesn't match. Prince Charles and the Pope (Benediktos) are the only two on earth that I know of that add up. I just can't seen to place how they'll work them into the schedule. :/

posted on Jul, 18 2006 @ 11:20 AM
yeah, as you've been typing that, I was doing some reasearch on the theories behind Charles/and or Prince William, and theres some heavy stuff there.

top topics

<<   2  3 >>

log in