Now this is a proper scandal but the repugnants won't care. They're amoral.

Ths fat mama is local girl where I live (Dallas, Texas). She has been CORRECTLY labeled a LOON for years. She has more skeletons in HER closet than the whole Bush Clan combined! That's ALOT of skeletons...

P...
m...

[Edited on 10-8-2003 by Springer]

Hold on energy wave,

I am definitely not a Bush supporter, far from it. However, the fact that he said "There's no question that Saddam Hussein had Al Qaeda ties." In September 2002, he said, "You can't distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam." But Bush also said two weeks ago, "We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the Sept. 11." does not make it false.

Saddam very well could have ties with Al Qaeda, but not be involved in Sept. 11. Al Qaeda functions on several levels and is undoubtedly at task on numerous initiatives, so it is quite possible that Saddam had no link to Sept. 11. I bet he wishes he had though.

Luke

Originally posted by Springer
Ths fat mama is local girl where I live (Dallas, Texas). She has been CORRECTLY labeled a LOON for years. She has more skeletons in HER closet than the whole Bush Clan combined! That's ALOT of skeletons...

P...
m...

[Edited on 10-8-2003 by Springer]

The modus operandi of the repugnant: Attack the messenger while ignoring message out of conveneicne.

The modus operandi of the repugnant: Attack the messenger while ignoring message out of convenience

ROFL!!!
I've just got this mental image of the Fat Texan from the simpsons running around the FedEx centre yelling Yee-haw and slaughtering the FedEx people

Notice how when Newsmax claim poll information they never actually tell us how they poll or where they are polling, If they are polling their viewers they are naturally going to get very pro-america flag-waving voting bias, I have seen so much bull on that site that i now have it listed under humour.

Wasn't there something about "attack the messanger" above...........

The links between Saddam and al-qaeda were slim. The evidence comprises of one meeting between one Iraqi Intelligence Officer and one al-qaeda operative, once.

The CIA has interacted with thousands of Islamic militants over the last couple of decades, no doubt many were members of al-qaeda.

As far as 9/11, I think we all know that the Saddam connection is nonesense, the evidence for this connection is none, it comprises only of Donald Rumsfeld claiming the day after the attacks before he had seen any evidence regarding the attackers, "It was Iraq, lets get Saddam"

Never trust a socialist for lying to them is as natural as breathing.

There you go again, calling me something I am NOT. The messenger, in THIS case is a WHACK JOB who makes up little stories out of half truths because she is incapable of getting a date.

I am an INDEPENDANT who understands just how TOTALLY out of touch the radical Left Wing of the Democratic Party is with America.

The fact that 25% of DEMOCRATS voted for Arnold should tell even YOU something!

PEACE...
m...

Is one of the most respected journalist in th business, has been a thorn in the side of EVERY president who deserved one over her very long and distinguished career, regardless of party, and has been spot on with Bush since his mismanagement days at the state level.

Copcorn: learn the board, at least this forum: Newsmax/Rense/New Republic/Drudge - NONE are accepted as viable news sources and definetly not respected as qoute/reference worthy.
So yeah, that messanger gets a foot in the azz.