 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 12:55 AM by John White
|
Guys, with no disrespect but Ive seriously got to question wether any more than one or two of you have done any background at all on this, such as
reading any relevant part of any of ickes books or watching/listening to any relevant video or audio
The biggest point of all about this is that Icke is hardly alone in presenting this information (re: dimensions)...its concurrent throughout human
history, particularily beyond the limitations of the knowledge found to be socially acceptable through much of western history since the start of
Roman Catholisism
I'm not particularily interested in debunking a debunk but a couple of hours study can make a world of difference
Im happy to link you up but Im not looking to impose, theres volumes of amazing info out there if your willing to put some effort in
A few pointers all the same:
Firstly, if Ickes especially distastefull for you, perhaps Michael Talbot or Deepak Chopra might be more informative
And it might be of interest to know that the human eye (brain really, but thats a more involved issue) is capable of seeing only a small fraction of
the ordinary electromagnetic spectrum, and that the electromagnetic spectrum encompasses the vibrational frequency of far less than 1% of the known
mass of the universe, at least if advanced physics is right about anything at all...
And that latest research coming out of Russia indicates that "things" are only solid when interacting with the vibrational frequency of the matter
composing a body to interpret the quantum waveforms? and without a body (an experiential suit) nothing "solid" can ttuly be said to exist?
Hence, extending the hypothesis goes "the spirit world" etc, another dimensional frequency outside of the perception of this one
Where you also aware that, according to more apocryphal sources, marconi used his early experiments in radiography to communicate with the "other
side", and that the frequency range of standard radio was by extension set below the required Hz ranges to access the same?
Somehow Im not sure that a bit of word play quite counts for a "debunk" there...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 11:05 PM by The_Doctor
|
Or how about Albert Einstein one of the greatest minds ever he says 4 dimensions in our universe no more no less and he did the math for it too.
Either do the math for these theories proove them in equations or no go. Abby Einstein has yet to be proven wrong on his work with 4 dimensions and
his theory or relativity.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 11:34 PM by John White
|
"Reality is an Illusion, although a persistant one"
said: Albert Einstein
Strange but true
I beleive there may be some issue with the concept of this word "dimension" being used
Mathematics may be a means to create a model of the universe, but make no mistake:
It is not the universe itself, only a picture of it
In that way, how is science any different to, for example, a religous beleif that uses right brain metaphor, poetry and symbology instead of
left-brain logic reason and caluclation?
Both maps: not the territory
Should any text or calculation be confused what we are actually experiancing?
[edit on 18-3-2006 by John White]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-3-2006 @ 02:10 AM by The_Doctor
|
Science has givin us every thing we have to throw our lives away for a religeos concept has no comparrison.
Religion vs science has no substance you can't compare the 2.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-3-2006 @ 02:29 AM by John White
|
Originally posted by The_Doctor
Science has givin us every thing we have to throw our lives away for a religeos concept has no comparrison.
Religion vs science has no substance you can't compare the 2. 
That depends. Being an expert in the mathematics defining painting does not make one an artist
Different streams of knowledge work best when balanced with each other
Like Science and Ethics, for example
And, unless filtering out all else but the extremes, I dont hear religion asking for the ultimate sacrifice:
the opposite: at the heart of most religions is the veneration of Life
Scientists excell at slow methodical method which has lasting benefits
but it takes another kind of mind to contemplate six differing metaphysical concepts at the same time
Pure Spiritual Philosophy is the understanding of the best path for living in one's life...all religions are potential guides to that
These ideas are old indeed: the Greeks expressed them as the dynamic between Logos and Mythos
[edit on 21-3-2006 by John White]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-3-2007 @ 06:46 PM by speaker
|
Beware of absolutes!
How does one truly know anything? In all likelyhood, one can only be convinced beyond a satisfactory level. As an earlier poster alluded to, there
is much that seems certain, right up until the time it is disproven.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 09:33 PM by biggie smalls
|
4th dimension is time, 3rd dimension is space, 5th is well I don't know since I don't live there yet...and so on probably unlimited though.
Just my thoughts.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-8-2007 @ 07:23 AM by Lukekilla4
|
Originally posted by omega1
Originally posted by waffleprime
*krackes overdue knuckles* First, to understand a fourth dimension..one must understand the 3 which we can see and any hillbilly from the alps can
figure out.

any hillbilly from the alps? The alps are in Europe, and hillbilly is a term for an American person that lives in an extremely rural area.
On the other hand, I totally agree with you, there are many dimensions.
I however do not believe in reptillians...

Hey guys for all we know the reptillians could be watching us right now.....
[edit on 19-8-2007 by Lukekilla4]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-8-2007 @ 06:03 PM by Neferes
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm rather new to the site and am just recently becoming acquainted to the various theories surrounding the reptilians.
Is it theorized that the reptilians actually exist within the fourth dimension?
Now, I am certainly not a Physics major nor do I have any great degree of experience in dealing with relativity of any kind, be it special or general,
but as I understand it, the fourth dimension is in fact time and is used in the description of matter moving through time.
In the same vein, I am not totally familiar with this David Icke fellow either. I have done a little bit of research and read about his conspiracy
that the reptilians have taken control of the world by having hybrid human-reptilians become our world leaders. However, in the article I found I
quote:
he identified the extraterrestrial Prison Warders as reptilians from the constellation Draco.

Now this differs quite a bit from what I have read about the Reptilians living in the fourth dimension. Is this just incorrect or has he modified his
theory? Given, I found this information on Wikipedia, and thus it could be modified by a spiteful individual that does not subscribe to Mr. Icke's
theory.
At any rate, I believe it is more possible to believe that they did in fact come from the group of stars called Draco than the fourth dimension. That
is assuming that my understanding of the Fourth Dimension is correct and it is referring to time. If I am wrong in my understanding and someone who
has some kind of knowledge of Physics and Relativity is able, please explain the fourth dimension and how it is a valid theory to believe that there
is a race of Reptilians living there.
Thanks,
Nef
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2008 @ 12:07 PM by fatdad
|
imagine if we where so small that we could stand on an atom that looked to us the size of a planet..in the sky around the atom would molecules and
electrons look like other planets or stars.. would the surface of the atom where standing on be smooth or rough with hills and valleys ?...what im
trying to say is maybe the 4th dimension be size and are we really just so small we dont see the bigger picture or are we so big we dont see the
smaller planets and people beyond current technology to see them....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-4-2008 @ 07:58 PM by toasted
|
reply to post by The_Doctor
" Or how about Albert Einstein one of the greatest minds ever he says 4 dimensions in our universe no more no less and he did the math for it
too."
I thought the string theory was proven, [ which made einstein wrong, kinda ] and that the other dimensions were extremely small, something along the
lines of 10x 10 to the minus 17 or something. Sorry , it's not a number that just rolls off the tongue.
And the only reason that science and religion don't appear to be compatible, is for one simple reason, the enemy of truth controls the well known
authorities as well as the puppet media.
So, no big surprise there either.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-4-2008 @ 08:12 PM by Anti-Tyrant
|
I find it amusing to note how people refer to the '1st' dimension as if it was the 1st.
Who is to say it is not the 5th Dimension, or even the 129th?
What if the dimensions we perceive now are merely the proverbial 'tip of the iceberg', and that reality spirals into an insane vortex of overlapping
dimensions that eventually choke one another and cause the dimensional fabric of the universe to warp into an entirely different set of
dimensions?
Interesting is 'Time's' place in all of this - my thinking is that if the basic three dimensions we are aware of are in positions like 65, 66, 67,
then Time would probably be one of the dimensions under 10 in priority.
I'm not saying that time transcends dimensional space, only that time exists within it - we simply don't know if there are dimensions out there in
which Time simply isn't an issue (or, frighteningly, where Time comes and goes at a speed of which compared to our Dimension's time is like watching
a cheetah compete with a turtle in a game of speed).
Maybe one day i'll explain that hive mentality...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |