I'm really enjoying my introduction to Wiki writing, but I have to warn you; I'm blaming Tin Wiki when I botch my speech on Thursday for lack of practice.

Another addiction was the last thing I needed lol.

Has ATS partnered up with Wikipedia.com? Do they know about ATS's partial copy of their format? Don't want to be sued.

My suggestions for the tinwiki:

-A good mythology section would be great, many conspiracies here depend on a good understanding of ancient religions.

-Divide the Masonry section in two. One for Masons, one for non-masons. This way we won't have people wiping the tinwiki out every few arguments (same for the religion section would be great too).

-I'd apreciate a good backmasking section. This is a neat conspiracy which is rarely covered in ATs. I could provide links to decent backmasking sites.

Originally posted by lostinspace
Has ATS partnered up with Wikipedia.com? Do they know about ATS's partial copy of their format? Don't want to be sued.

WikiMedia provides a free and open source software solution for creating "Wikis". We're using their software and their default template.

This is actually the recommended method, so that users become familiar with Wiki standards as more and more sites create Wikis.