Its been an interesting thread so far. i thought I would throw in my own 2 cents worth.
First off: I am an advocate of euthanasia. I firmly belive in the absence of meaningfull hope or recovery individulas or families of individuals
should have the right to put an end to pain and suffering felt by loved ones.
In this case we have many trigger words. Esp. when you mix "infants" with "euthanasia". The instinct to protect our little ones is strong, perhaps
the strongest we may have and jus tthe title is to produce a knee jerk reaction because of this instinct.
That being said as many of you know, all of my 11 years as an RN have been spent in pediatric critical care. I have had the fortune and misfortune to
witness time and time again both extremes when faced with a child that was going to die often in the most painfull away any of us could imagine.
Some families have elected to stop treatment and allow thier child to recieve pain medication and die in the love and warmth of thier parents embrace.
Others have chosen to maintain treatment often escalating it to the point where it hard to determine where the technology begins and the child ends.
Alot of time, effort, emotion, and money can be spent on futility. Yes, I said money: Its a factor that few want to discuss but it is very relevant.
How many people would flog thier child till the very end if they had to pay for it out of pocket?
However, in both cases, it was a choice by the prents. As you can tell from my description, which one I favor. I would favor the dying peacefully
choice for my own 3 year old if faced with similar circumstances.
From the article:
If a child is untreatably ill,” Verhagen explained, “there can be horrendous suffering that makes the last few days or weeks of this child’s
life unbearable. Now the question is: are you going to leave the child like that or are you going to prevent that suffering?” He went on: “Does
the child have to sit it out until the end? We think that the answer is no. There can be circumstances where, under very strict conditions, if all the
requirements are fulfilled, active ending of life can be an option — but only in cases of untreatable disease and unbearable suffering.”
www.timesonline.co.uk...
Many posters give the impression of goose stepping, jack booted types roaming infant wards and playing god, but that is simply not the case. Few of
you can ever even come close to relating to the pain these little ones endure for the sake of life itself.
For those opposed to ending the pain and suffering of those with little or no hope, I have to ask you this: Are you making the judgement on whats
based on thier needs or your own?