It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stargates are real

page: 201
634
<< 198  199  200    202  203  204 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:06 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:08 AM
link   
reply to post by azure-door
 


eh, a troll.

ah well, thought this was going to be a serious conversation.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:10 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:13 AM
link   
Have you read the thread?

So far you have contributed nothing but trollish bla, bla.

If you want to be taken seriously maybe you should contribute something to the thread, no?



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Ayrton
 


his big contribution is to assume that my ability to access a sumerian dictionary for use in word translation is evidence that i don't have one clue what i'm talking about as regards the language. and that's only one facet of it. not to mention the etymological dictionaries, the concordances for hebrew, aramic and greek. the rest of the research, such as the translated texts from oxford university... that's all useless data because i don't know how to read the original language verbatim.

so yeah, a troll.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:16 AM
link   
The thread is dead because noone knows what they are talking about, noone knows sumerian, egyptian, akkadian etc etc. It shouldnt be in the UFOlogy board even. You are searching for the secrets of man's history and you dont even bother to learn the languages? That tells me you are lazy and your conclusions will most likely be wrong (which they are)



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:19 AM
link   
We all have an open mind here.
Enlighten us, please. I'm all ears, present your explanations, ideas, research in that area.

We'll all gladly take time to read it.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:20 AM
link   
reply to post by azure-door
 


you have an example where it's wrong? what post contains the first noticeable error? perhaps then i can provide you with the train of thought that lead me to that conclusion.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:22 AM
link   
if you know so much let us in the awsome info you have,ive been enjoying this thread for years,if you don't have anything to say ...just go play in the highway



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:22 AM
link   
Why dont you post on some well regarded archaeology or ancient history site (or more likely mailing list lol) where people really know their stuff. Dont tell them about UFOs. Then see how far you get. I am not on this board to talk about ancient history.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:25 AM
link   
reply to post by azure-door
 


the problem is mainstream historians/archaeologists refuse to accept biblical texts as historically accurate except in the pursuit of archaeological sites. it's a double standard but this is the way of things, apparently



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:34 AM
link   
That's because they are inaccurate, and the fact that you think they are is a problem. Their chronologies are all wrong and it's only by cross referencing with other texts and archaeology that we can reconstruct the real chronology of events. This is still a big area of debate, there must be some great threads on archaeology sites.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by azure-door
That's because they are inaccurate, and the fact that you think they are is a problem. Their chronologies are all wrong and it's only by cross referencing with other texts and archaeology that we can reconstruct the real chronology of events. This is still a big area of debate, there must be some great threads on archaeology sites.


I think this post clearly shows that you didn't read more then the 1st page of this thread.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Ayrton
 


sigh.
oh well, back to reading.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:41 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by azure-door
 


how many pages have you read so far?
what points do you disagree with? ya need to name one so i can examine your critique for validity or error. but you're not. you're just sitting here posting one sentence insults.


[edit on 11-8-2009 by undo]



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:45 AM
link   
Ok so stargates are inconclusive, what isn't?!

We should work together more instead of fighting. Let's discuss, not bitch!

All of us present information. Then we'll all check it and possibly follow it up. I'm going to Peru next year so it would be interesting to go there and check it out.

A common question is: Where are the stargates now?

Anyone?

Interesting thought:
Has anyone thought of the possibility that we're all just being played? For instance, what if UFO's and the stories of Area 51 are just a ploy? What if Area 51 housed a stargate?

I mean, who cares about UFO's? So what? They can fly?! The technology is being developed by scientists now! What is much more interesting and worth keeping a secret are stargates and ways to move through the dimensions.

Too much coffee...



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:45 AM
link   
It's not insults, it's a reality check.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by azure-door
er why? if you repeat the same rubbish, can I not repeat the same arguments?


What arguments?




posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 09:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by azure-door
Their chronologies are all wrong and it's only by cross referencing with other texts and archaeology that we can reconstruct the real chronology of events.


...and that's exactly what undo has done in this thread, so I'm not sure what you think your point is.




top topics



 
634
<< 198  199  200    202  203  204 >>

log in

join