It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by magnito_student
I wonder if they purposely came out with the tv series Star Gate to shift everyones mindset that its just scifi and nothing more or perhaps to subconciously get us use to the idea so we all dont have cows when the reality of stargates is revealed
Originally posted by BlasteR
So, if they're real, maybe they were just left as ancient gifts to the mankind of the future. And maybe they Meant to be left so that we WOULD use them when we were ready and had the technology so we could join the "galactic federation" or something. Who knows!!
Originally posted by BlasteR
Interesting.. "Naturally occurring" ?
Tiny black holes small enough for people to pass through?
The Chinese researchers reported in their teleportation experiments that high-speed photography/videotaping recorded test specimens physically “melding” or blending with the walls of sealed containers, and in a different series of experiments the test specimens would simply disappear from inside the container only to reappear at another location (after seconds to several minutes of time transpired).
They also reported in the series of radio micro-transmitter experiments that there were large fluctuations in the intensity (in both amplitude and frequency) of the monitored signal to the effect that it would either completely disappear or become extremely weak (to the extent that the monitoring instruments could scarcely detect it); and they discovered that there was a definite correlation between the change in strength (i.e., radical frequency shifts were observed) of the monitored radio signal and the teleportation of the radio micro-transmitter, such that the weak or absent signal indicated that the specimen was “nonexistent” (or in an altered physical state) during teleportation. This data is important because without the aid of electronic monitoring instruments, the average person’s sensory organs and usual methods of detection are temporarily unable to perceive the test specimen’s (ambiguous) existence during the teleportation process. This data offers an important clue on what the teleportation mechanism is.
....the experimental results were all repeatable
-DTIC Copy - AFRL-PR-ED-TR-2003-0034
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Exuberant1
That is very interesting. I wonder if they ran tests to look for traces of xray's, as well.
The radio micro-transmitter used as a test specimen in one series of experiments (Shuhuang et al., 1981) transmitted a radio signal to several stationary electronic instruments/receivers, so that the specimen could be tracked and monitored (via signal amplitude and frequency measurements) during the teleportation process; the experimenters discovered that there was large fluctuations in the intensity (in both amplitude and frequency) of the monitored signal to the effect that it would either completely disappear or become extremely weak (to the extent that the monitoring instruments could scarcely detect it) – it was discovered that there was a definite correlation between the change in strength (i.e., radical frequency shifts were observed) of the monitored radio signal and the teleportation of the test specimen, such that the weak or absent signal indicated that the specimen was “nonexistent” (or in an altered physical state) during teleportation (note: the monitored signal amplitude and frequency of the micro-transmitter specimen were stable before and after teleportation);
the high-speed photography/videotaping recorded in one series of experiments that test specimens would physically “meld” or blend with the walls of sealed containers; and recorded in a different series of experiments that test specimens would simply disappear from inside the container only to reappear at another location (after seconds to several minutes of time transpired), such that the test specimen did not actually undergo total material disintegration/reintegration during teleportation – this data is important, because without the aid of electronic monitoring instruments, the average person’s sensory organs and usual methods of detection are temporarily unable to perceive the test specimen’s (ambiguous) existence during the teleportation process;
It has been proposed that our space actually possesses a slight four-dimensional hyperthickness, so that the ultimate components of our nervous system are actually higher dimensional, thus enabling the human mind/brain to imagine four-dimensional space (Hinton, 1888, 1904; Rucker, 1977)...
....Can we see into the 4th dimension and have four-dimensional thoughts? Yes, we can. Proof (see, Rucker, 1977, 1984): If you look at a Necker cube for a while, it spontaneously turns into its mirror image and back again. If you watch it do this often enough, the twinkling sort of motion from one state to the other begins to seem like a continuous motion. But this motion can only be continuous if it is a rotation in four-dimensional space. The mathematician August F. Möbius discovered in 1827 that it is in fact possible to turn a three-dimensional solid object into its mirror image by an appropriate rotation through four-dimensional space (a.k.a. hyperspace rotation). Thus, it is actually possible for our minds to perform such a rotation. Therefore, we can actually produce four-dimensional phenomenon in our minds, so our consciousness is four-dimensional.
An unusual teleportation concept has been proposed by Leshan (1999, 2002), which describes the teleportation of objects throughout our universe by using the geometrical properties of spacetime. The proposal posits that there is a “zero-space” that exists outside the boundary of our universe, whereby this zero-space is a “point form” space, where the distance between any two points is always equal to zero. Leshan also calls this space a “hole.”
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by undo
i need to clarify the ISH vs. ADAM reference in the post i'm replying to.
in old testament texts, the english word "man" has been substituted for all references to ISH and ADAM. ish is clearly not the same as adam, but there's no distinction for this in the english translation. my current theory is that an ish is a nephilim or a descendant of a nephilim.
to reiterate for those who haven't read the thread, the flood story as told from both the biblical and sumerian-akkadian perspective shares many of the same pieces of data regarding the event. where they differ is VERY important. even many bible scholars are not aware of this difference because of strict adherence to the concept of verbatim, inerrant scripture. it isn't so much that the text is incorrect as it is not comprehensively discussing the many fine details of the event. where the gaps occur or the lack of detailed info occurs, there's a whole bunch of additional data that can be not only added, but help to clarify what the entire picture must've looked like. these other data pieces are not necessary to know for the believer, but they are crucial for the apologist to know. absolutely. allow me to explain my theory on it thus far or from times past:
enlil = biblical jehovah. he's EL, ELOHIYM, EL SHADDAI, etc.
enki = biblical serpent.
enlil's creation = the adam
enki's creation = nephilim modifications made to the adam, et.al, the ish.
enlil warned noah of the impending disaster, thus saving the race of adams.
enki warned the king of sumer of the impending disaster, thus saving the race of ish, the nephilim.
this explains why enlil was so peeved at enki when he realized enki had went against the council and secretly revealed to the nephilim king that his kingdom was about to be wiped. it also explains why the texts say there were nephilim in the days after the flood as well. yes it had been meant by enlil to save the adams. and essentially it did. as it not only removed the inequal distribution of ish vs. adam, but it reset the ecological balance of the planet.
they are not identical stories, but they do "assist" in showing the whole picture and remove contradictory bits from both sources. read them together and the whole picture appears.