It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
from marg
You mean putting a gag order on anybody that wants to warn the American public of the illegal deals against the population of the US by the ones in power, that are after all elected by we people.
Then it will be easier to take the trouble makers away to concentration camps for becoming a national security threat.
from WyrdeOne
Jsobecky
Where's the flip-flop? Usually people support whistleblowers. We know there's a lot we're not being told in any given situation, and it's nice to see someone risk their own hide to bring the American people necessary information.
from Pyros
When this topic is discussed, what is never, ever mentioned is that there are authorized and approved internal channels within every government agency to expose and identify fraud, waste, and abuse. That includes programs that are heavily compartmentalized and controlled, even in the intelligence community.
Yes, the teacher is a passionate left-wing liberal. Yes the kid is probably enjoying the hell out of his fame.
My point is that there comes a time when the law that is protecting the corruption must be broken for the good of the people. It's easy to follow the rule of the law, but it requires a thinking populace to determine if that's always the best thing to do. It requires us, not to follow blindly, but to evaluate and discriminate.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
I'm going to bet people like you were ready to impeach Bush during the leaking of Plame's identity.
You could care less when something that could be used against Bush is leaked to the public, though.
It's all about your political agenda.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
My point is that there comes a time when the law that is protecting the corruption must be broken for the good of the people. It's easy to follow the rule of the law, but it requires a thinking populace to determine if that's always the best thing to do. It requires us, not to follow blindly, but to evaluate and discriminate.
That's why a blind following is preferable to those in power who are corrupt.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
... if the government is keeping information secret specifically so it can operate illegally or immorally, the whistleblower (or leaker) ends up becoming the hero, because he exposes a threat to the way our country is supposed to run. Regardless if he broke the law or not, he did it for the good of the people. Exposing true corruption of those in power is more important than making sure you don't break any laws, in my opinion.
Bush declares war on freedom of the press
By DOUG THOMPSON
Using many of the questionable surveillance and monitoring techniques that brought both questions and criticism to his administration, President George W. Bush has launched a war against reporters who write stories unfavourable to his actions and is planning to prosecute journalists to make examples of them in his "war on terrorism."
Bush recently directed Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to use "whatever means at your disposal" to wiretap, follow, harass and investigate journalists who have published stories about the administration's illegal use of warrant less wiretaps, use of faulty intelligence and anything else he deems "detrimental to the war on terror."
Reporters for The New York Times, which along with Capitol Hill Blue revealed use of the National Security Agency to monitor phone calls and emails of Americans, say FBI agents have interviewed them and criminal prosecutors at the Justice Department admit they are laying "the groundwork for a grand jury that could lead to criminal charges,"
~~
Political scientist George Harleigh, who worked in the Nixon administration, says such use of federal law enforcement authority was illegal when Nixon tried it and still so today.
"We're talking about a basic violation of the Constitutional guarantee of a free press as well as a violation of the rights of privacy of American citizens," Harleigh says. "I had hoped we would have learned our lessons from the Nixon era. Sadly, it appears we have not."