posted on Oct, 14 2003 @ 02:25 PM
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
As usual, a stupid signature. The "Colonel" (you know the guy, he takes on a name of a soldier, a warrior, although he hasn't the guts to serve)
claims to take on conservatives and lay waste to them. The only thing it lays waste to is the truth. He can only sling profanity and insults as a
short order cook slings hash, but unlike the short order cook's handywork, its worthless. Except for laughs and for the opportunity to use the
nonsense to pass along good sense. Unfortunately, he has made himself a non-issue to where most pay little attention to him. Well, except me, who
sees him like a train wreck that you don't want to watch but is controlled by morbid curiosity, and a few who aren't using their deductive reasoning
capabilities who actually pay attention to his venomous blustering. He grows boring, though. Like a chase scene that lasts twice as long as it
should and isn't worth the time.
Same old stuff, TC. 'Cept for the sig, that's... um... "new ammo," if you will.
THIS IS GETTING REAL OLD, REAL FAST. On both sides, might I add. How many times can we be over the fact that "republicans suck" and "democrats are
lying bastards?" We get the point. Now come up with something better to use.
Personal attacks are also getting old, TC. This is the second time you done this in like a page, and this time you were unprovoked. Don't start
pointing the finger and yelling, "BUT COLONEL STARTED IT!"
What we need to do is keep this a nice, civilized debate. No name calling, no insults, no profanity(this was aimed towards Colonel, mainly). Keep it
nice 'n' simple, boys. A duel. Mwahahahahaha... I like this.
However, I think its a bad idea to put TC and Colonel alone in the same topic at once. We'll need the others to keep the tension down.
Ooooooooh.... I like this.
PS No more attacks, TC... mods aren't allowed to do that. William wants an example set, doesn't he?