It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Anti - Matter weaponry research.

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 3 2006 @ 07:39 PM

This is a very scary article. they are trying to make anti matter bombs for use. The USAF even admit as much, and have now started a clamp down on talking about anti matter research and its uses.

This article may be a bit old (2004) but its got some very very interesting points in it, especially the ultra powerful nukes and bombs...scary!

posted on Mar, 3 2006 @ 08:31 PM
Antimatter has a dark side just like everything else, in one hand it could be extremely destructive, and on the another it would completely solve human energy needs because it is 100% efficient.

posted on Mar, 4 2006 @ 04:14 AM
Unfortunately there is no way of making antimatter without using huge amounts of energy. It won't wolve our power problems. But you can make some very powerful weapons with it.

posted on Mar, 9 2006 @ 04:43 AM
what if the used the much talked about zero point energy? harnessing that could very well lead to a way to produce larger quantities of anti-matter than currently possible.

posted on Mar, 10 2006 @ 02:11 AM
I am new in this stuff. I read something about anti-matter and i have qustions? Why any country use ant-matter for weapon? You can use neutron bombs kill people and everything stay for you. And how they make anti-mater bombs for spec. matter? How they will handle with anti-matter?

posted on Mar, 11 2006 @ 01:21 AM
with every bomb we have so far, there is a certain amount of radiation released. with anti-matter, there would be no radiation.

posted on Mar, 11 2006 @ 09:58 AM
Anti-matter is the key to many other things if it can be harnessed.
First thing that comes to my mind is long distance propulsion..

posted on Mar, 11 2006 @ 10:36 AM
Anti matter isn't the answer to anything, PET scanners excluded! It could perhaps be used as an energy storage medium but even that is very very speculative.

posted on Mar, 11 2006 @ 03:50 PM
For those sceptics that say "Anti-matter" isn't real, well it is, we have produced a limited number of anti-matter particles, I think half a dozen? It took us 30 years to make half a dozen anti-matter particles, and at this rate, if we were going to deploy anti-matter as a viable source for anything, we'd be sitting here waiting to accumulate enough of it for o say, several billions of years.

So Anti-matter weaponry=bust.

Shattered OUT...

posted on Mar, 11 2006 @ 04:42 PM
The USAF admitted to investing millions in Anti-matter weapons and then everything whent quiet and it either stopped or went black.

I think half a dozen? It took us 30 years to make half a dozen anti-matter particles

Anti-matter production is pathetic but not that pathetic. CERN was able to create approximately 100 antihydrogen atoms at their facilities in realtively short amount of time compared to 30 years.

We dont have any practical way to make the stuff at present its really more of a random act right now if you use enough particles theres a very small chance a antiparticle will be created.

The stuff does hold the promise of being more powerful then anything we can dream up. A perfect 100% mass to energy reaction the best fusion reaction we make only do about 12% I think.

A penny weight of anti-matter would be able to launch the space shuttle like 60 times the perfect energy storage system.

Heres something fun to play around with

Anti-matter caculator

new topics

top topics


log in