posted on Oct, 7 2003 @ 07:35 AM
Always thought the term "United Nations" had a sinister tone to it,like united against what? would always seem to pop into my head for some
reason,sounds now like the nations are uniting against national sovereignty,not hiding it so much any more it seems,which seems to be occurring
If the government of a country cannot keep that country functioning,how is it more government will fix the problem?.
Snowball effect,bigger government is not better,the UN seems to be pursuing becoming the BIGGEST government.
Nations need to be united against a common foe that threatens them in times of war or emergency,anything else could be considered pre-emptive,we all
know what that will get us,if not into a lot of trouble and waste in a pre-emptive attack on another country,at least a lot of waste of resources in
pre-paration for some humanitarian emergency that never seems to justufy The UN's existence because it never seems to happen on the scale to
necessitate and justify it's expense,unless you happen to be one of those UN officials who is on the payroll forever.
Too much like an insurance company,nobody goes out to get into trouble,well,some do,but most don't,lotsa profit for the insurance company if not too
much happens to the undersigned's property,but some destruction has to occur to justify it's existence at all.
Fear of loss is a by product of greed.
[Edited on 7-10-2003 by uNBaLaNCeD]