So why suddenly is the New Madrid fault at the top
of their list? Is it really because of the Katrinia
response? Or is it something else? I'm betting
on the 'something else'.
www.foxnews.com...
except
AP - February 28, 2006
ST. LOUIS — Preparing for a catastrophic earthquake along the New Madrid
fault is a priority, a FEMA official said Friday before a congressional field
hearing on government readiness to handle natural disasters.
"New Madrid is at the top of the list," Michel Pawlowski, section chief of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, said. "It's our primary objective."
Pawlowski told a congressional committee that FEMA has "significant
concerns" for the potential of a catastrophic earthquake equal in
magnitude to those that struck parts of the Mississippi River Valley
in 1811-1812, and again in 1895.
More at the site -
www.foxnews.com...
[edit on 3/2/2006 by FlyersFan]
|
Probably because a majority of buildings in that area are not built up to sesmic codes like hrere in Calif,so no sheer walls or let in braces will
cause buildings and homes to shake apart,which will cause utter devastation,I'm thinking of deaths in 100 thousands
|
A high magnitude quake on the New Madrid fault could cause widespread devastation. Something like 20 states could be affected. Its a big concern,
because New Madrid is approaching overdue for a big quake. As time goes on, the chance of a HIGH magnitude earthquake on the New Madrid fault
increases.
And who knows, maybe they realize that they can't handle a dang thing when it comes to disaster.
--Kit.
|
I think Oldtimer's got it right -- buildings really aren't up to code for earthquakes. And Kitsunegari makes good points about why they're doing
this.
Here's the USGS page on it:
quake.wr.usgs.gov...
Problem is, there's been a lot of areas where "high magnitude earthquakes" are "overdue" and we haven't seen the quakes. I think that the
public will start getting annoyed with planning for the "dangerous but remote possibilities", particularly if plans for "fairly frequent
disasters" (like floods) are ignored.
|
There was a program on the Weather Channel the other night called It Could Happen Tomorrow. I would say half of the reports they have done so far are
nonsense. F5 hitting Dallas? Very unlikely. Major hurricane hitting NY City? Also unlikely. Mount Rainier eruption? Very possible. New Madrid
quake? Very likely. Of all the programs they have run the New Madrid quake scenario is really the only one that could "happen tomorrow". It is
frightening when you think of the possibility of multiple 7.0+ quakes in a month. Each quake just stacking up the damage from the previous quake.
The report said the damge of a quake in this region of the country would cause damage over an area 20 times greater than a quake of the same strength
on the west coast. The damage estimates they used were one hundred billion dollars. I think we know after Katrina that 100 billion goes very fast.
If the early 1800's quakes were repeated I feel confident that the property damage would approach a quarter of a trillion dollars. The overall
economic impact would be far worse. Something of this magnitude would thrust the US into a depression for a decade or longer. You are talking about
the total destruction of Memphis and severe damage to places like St. Louis, Nashville, Louisville, Indianapolis and Cincinnati. A walk through these
towns afterwards would remind you less of New Orleans and more of Biloxi. Major city centers would face severe damage. You may be looking at the
collapse of many high rise buildings. Older neighborhoods would be in total ruin with fires buring out of control for days if not weeks.
I live in Indianapolis. I dread the day this happens. Most of this city will go up in flames. This city is served by natural gas. Alot of
neighborhoods around town are 90 to 100 years old and all with very old gas lines. Most areas around town have aerial power lines. These will
certainly come down in a major quake. This is the spark needed to cause massive gas explosions all around town. I would bet that 90 to 95% of the 1.7
million people in the metro area have absolutely no idea what to do in the event of a quake. The number of dead in this city alone from collapsing
buildings and gas explosions will certainly be approaching 10,000. Thats being nice. Thats assuming it happens at night when people are at home
asleep. If it happens during the day when people are in large buildings at work you could see that number multiply by 10. The numbers could be to 2
to 5 times higher in Memphis. That city will be gone. It will be nothing but a pile of rubble. Some of the buildings constructed within the past 20
years might stand. Might. The rest will surely crumble. And what gets left standing after the first 7 point quake will likely come down when the
2nd & 3rd 7 pointers hit in the following days.
How do you begin to prepare for something that would make the tsunami look like a ripple? Do you even bother to prepare or just deal with it when it
happens?
|