posted on Mar, 2 2006 @ 03:24 PM
The Point is that the only purpose of a SADM is for Terrorist use. That is the one and only point of such a weapon.
Sure, they may not have done it YET.
I (being an Australian) remember a time (not that long ago), when French Intelligence Navy Divers infiltrated a New Zealand port to BLOW UP the
Rainbow Warrior (Greenpeace) ship.
This was considered an act of TERRORISM.
A SADM is a TERRORIST weapon (albeit that only the USA has them in their Arsenal). They admitted to still stockpiling them in the 1980s.
Imagine if somebody (say an Iraqi terrorist Group) got hold of one. Don't say it can't happen. One can quite easily (if one has a couple of Million
dollars spare) get hold of a Nuclear Briefcase (ex-Soviet).
Ah, forget it, I couldn't be bothered trying to explain to such idiots as you guys who replied to the thread.
[edit on 2-3-2006 by Ixataar]