It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does everything have to be so black and white?
Originally posted by Sauron
A picture is worth a thousand word they say, More a long the lines of billions of dollars.
"Fundamentally, the policy [of arming Saddam] was justified," argues David Newton, a former U.S. ambassador to Baghdad, who runs an anti-Hussein radio station in Prague. "We were concerned that Iraq should not lose the war with Iran, because that would have threatened Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. Our long-term hope was that Hussein's government would become less repressive and more responsible."
What makes present-day Hussein different from the Hussein of the 1980s, say Middle East experts, is the mellowing of the Iranian revolution and the August 1990 invasion of Kuwait that transformed the Iraqi dictator, almost overnight, from awkward ally into mortal enemy. In addition, the United States itself has changed. As a result of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, U.S. policymakers take a much more alarmist view of the threat posed by the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
www.washingtonpost.com
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The sages among us often remind us that history is not written in photo ops, though sometimes administrations and demagogues wish it was.
Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein:
The U.S. Tilts toward Iraq, 1980-1984
Rumsfeld also met with Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz, and the two agreed, "the U.S. and Iraq shared many common interests." Rumsfeld affirmed the Reagan administration's "willingness to do more" regarding the Iran-Iraq war, but "made clear that our efforts to assist were inhibited by certain things that made it difficult for us, citing the use of chemical weapons, possible escalation in the Gulf, and human rights." He then moved on to other U.S. concerns. Later, Rumsfeld was assured by the U.S. interests section that Iraq's leadership had been "extremely pleased" with the visit, and that "Tariq Aziz had gone out of his way to praise Rumsfeld as a person".
www.gwu.edu...
Originally posted by LDragonFire
He can threaten to veto all he wants, but Congress will override his veto. The American Public is completely against this. Its also hard for me to believe that no American company would be willing to purchase the contracts to run these ports.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I really haven't lost any sleep over this story.
Originally posted by Dr. Know
Yes, Canada and Mexico...
NOTHING has changed with the exception of who writes the checks and who reaps the profits...
Great Britian is an ally to the US just like the UAE. What's the difference?
Clear obfuscation of the issue. ATS already has threads concerning immigration or you can start another, however immigration has nothing to do with issue.
The Bush administration has demonstrated over and over that everything it does is all about money & oil.
The difference is that none of the 9/11 hijackers were British. If Clinton did this you "faux patriots" would be screaming for his impeachment. Now you jokers are twisting and turning to rationalize these Bush administrations actions which clearly put our national security at risk.
This isn't about politcal ideology, its about applying common sense to a critical national security issue. Either you have common sense or you dont. Those that support turning our ports over the UAE obviously have none.
Originally posted by Dr. Know
By the way, immigration wasn't even mentioned by me.
Previously posted by Dr. Know
I find it ironic that while most people are screaming about "security" at the ports, they have little to no concern about the porus borders to the north and south. Yes, Canada and Mexico for those of you aren't aren't very good with maps...
Originally posted by Dr. Know
It's called a free market economy.
It goes on further stating that Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said: "We all deal with the UAE on a regular basis. It's a country that's been involved in the global war on terror."