It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
kaotik68
Please refrain from posting if you cannot come up with anything better than the "racism card". I am not a racist
Oh boo hoo, you don't want to be seen as a racist, even though your entire idea here is that 'dirty arabs can't be trusted, they're all terrrorists'.
, the fact is it is not a good idea security wise for our country. Can you imagine the security ramifications?
OMG you're right, those evil arabs, they're born with suicide belts!
You will find dishonest people everywhere, so who's to say that a terrorist organization will not infiltrate through the UAE company and slip into the country
Please explain why the London company was somehow immune from this?
Please look past all the racial references
If they weren't arab, there wouldn't be a problem. The london company wasn't an arab company, and none of us have ever even heard about them until now. Race is the only issue here, its the only issue that anyone against this sale has been able to raise.
Murcielago
so tell me why do we want them owning OUR ports.
It doesn't matter if you want them to or not. These are things that are traded on the open market, you don't even have a right to be telling anyone whether or not they can sell something that they own, least of all when no one can cite any actual problem with this company, other than it being from 'evil arabic lands, where the desert winds howl with menance and evil horsemen plant bombs in the night".
fiverz
It's the fact that it's a GOVERNMENT OWNED AND OPERATED company. The previous British companies were private
If anything a private company is more dangerous to US interests than an allied government. A private company is only motivated by the profit motive, whereas another country has a whole slew of interests, least of which is being freindly with the US. Why in the world is a private, unaccountable corporate entity so much prefered to a public government? An ally that is taking a lot of flack merely for being an ally nonetheless!??
one of its senior executives, Dave Sanborn
My god! How can we let such islamic extremists as a guy with the name Dave Sanborn obviously has to be, to get their evil tentacles on our ports! Right there is probably going to be the reason why nothing comes of this. The American public is going to see that most of the guys actually operating this company are anglos instead of arabs, and then they're going to let it drop.
Originally posted by Kaotik68
quote: kaotik68
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Kaotik68
quote: kaotik68
Please learn to use the quotes. Thank you.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Fiverz
kaotik68
Please refrain from posting if you cannot come up with anything better than the "racism card". I am not a racist
Oh boo hoo, you don't want to be seen as a racist, even though your entire idea here is that 'dirty arabs can't be trusted, they're all terrrorists'.
I didn't see anyone complaining that they are an arabic country.
People are complaining about their known ties to terrorism ... something I do not agree with anyways (need more proof).
Again, instead of directly responding to the question, you take another faux jab at arabs. What gives?
If you fail to see this you are very ignorant of the power of foreign governments.
You are right that we have no say in it. But again, enough with the arab references ... this has nothing to do with the particular country.
Look at the UAE's wealth. Do they really need American ports?
kaotika
If you are that disheartened maybe you could move to the UAE, I am sure you would be much happier there.
Originally posted by marg6043
27jd
That is the best post so far in the thread, I could not stop laughing.
The reason US population is so hysterical about Arabs is because so far we have been fed day and night by our administration that most Arab countries harbor terrorist.
For one side we have the administration telling us that we are fighting in Iraq because terror, 9/11 was cause by terrorist from Arab nations.
Countries in Europe are having problems with their muslin and Arab populations.
Bush tell us that US doesn't do business with countries that may harbor terrorism.
And now we have to sit like good littler children and be nice or be call racist?
So what anybody expect, the indoctrination of the American public has gone this time to far in order to secure our energy future in Iraq and the middle east and to justify our troops in that area.
I don't care who is the one doing business and own our land but we are the tax payer and rightful residents and citizens of this country so our voices have to be heard.
This is an issue of security not racism and neither politics
But I guess is taken by politicians and interest groups anyway it may go with their agendas.
Shame on all of them, we Americans should not even be fighting about his at all, we should be questioning the intentions of doing business deals behind close doors and away from the congress when it has to do with our nations security.
This is racism, plain and simple.
Why do we do business with ANY arabs then? Does this mean I should not trust Mahmuud at the local Circle K? I mean, if he is Afghani. maybe the has a bomb strapped to his leg.
We are asked to look upon everyone as an equal so why is this not applied to international business? Are you unaware of how much of the US is owned by companies not in the US?
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
but at least a framework exists for pursuing grievances.
:shk:
Originally posted by loam
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
but at least a framework exists for pursuing grievances.
:shk:
Exactly! For me the issue is one of accountability. Granting a foreign government this kind of access to our infrastructure produces none.
Originally posted by loam
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
but at least a framework exists for pursuing grievances.
:shk:
Exactly! For me the issue is one of accountability. Granting a foreign government this kind of access to our infrastructure produces none.
Originally posted by Lanton
Hrrmmm, so you didn't know that PNO was a British company?
Originally posted by loam
Originally posted by Lanton
Hrrmmm, so you didn't know that PNO was a British company?
Note the emphasis on the word COMPANY. The UAE entity is owned by the STATE.
BIG difference.
Oh, and I feel no less comforted by the fact that our port infrastructure is run by any foreign nationals.
Originally posted by Lanton
you're still against the deal because they're Arabs?
Originally posted by loam
I feel no less comforted by the fact that our port infrastructure is run by any foreign nationals.
Originally posted by Lanton
Or is it because you're one of those trade protectionist nutters - the ones with their heads in the sand?
In speeches, administration enthusiasm for free trade abounds. "Fearful people build walls around America," said the president this spring, but "confident people make sure there are no walls." In practice, however, Mr. Bush seems to reach for the trowel and mortar every other week to slap on another brick of protectionism.
Source.