It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kshaund
It sure seems that way - had no idea that person had 10,000 posts - that's pretty obsessive. Seems they like to attack faulcon personally rather than her information, a classic move - attack the messenger instead of questioning the message. . .
Originally posted by Uncle Benny
You only have to spend a short time on MFH (Maccas Fun House) to realise it`s a front and a sham.
You will find the MFH posters on all these forums (and more, like here on ATS and on the D.I forum) doing everything and anything to persuade people that "Paul is still Paul"...............
They`ll give their reasons about bringing balance and all that nonsense. Let me ask you, if you believed PID was nonsense would you spend almost everyday on forums trying to persuade other people??
Yes they`ve continually ridiculed and attacked Faulcon because she has persevered and caused them more headaches than most. Like you say, they have attacked her personally
It`s the lowest of the low, cowardly stuff but for all their tactics they`re extremely limited in what they can achieve. Once you see Paul McCartney was permanently replaced there`s nothing anyone can do about it!
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Originally posted by kshaund
It sure seems that way - had no idea that person had 10,000 posts - that's pretty obsessive. Seems they like to attack faulcon personally rather than her information, a classic move - attack the messenger instead of questioning the message. . .
It's classic disinfo.
It's easier to "try" to discredit me than to attack the facts.
The fact is that Paul & Faul have different colored eyes, different eyebrows, different noses, different jawlines, different ears, & different heights. This isn't my "opinion." It's been proven by objective evidence - forensics,
Originally posted by Uncle Benny
I`ll explain it for you very simply -
Recently the D.I forum PID threads have been over-run by about 8 - 10 posters from MFH (Maccas Fun House), a forum with one main intent, to debunk anything to do with PID.
Some of these MFH debunkers are here, and you`re one of them. Here let me show you -
maccafunhouse.proboards.com...
The above story was fabricated by a poster calling herself Elisha on D.I and who posts on MFH as ET Girl/Miss Vagie... Again let me show you -
maccafunhouse.proboards.com...
This poster has over 10,000 (Yes that`s right - OVER 10,000 POSTS ON A FORUM SET UP TO DEBUNK ANYTHING TO DO WITH PID).
What I`ll say is if I had over 10,000 posts on a forum completely dedicated to debunking something I didn`t believe in, I`d think about signing myself in somewhere. What a complete waste of time to ridicule and insult people who are dedicated to exposing the replacement of Paul McCartney (or at least investigating it)....
Unless of course there`s a very good reason for the massive resistance -TO PUT PEOPLE OFF LOOKING INTO IT.
[edit on 29-8-2009 by Uncle Benny]
Originally posted by magnolia_xx
Faulcon, I think someone attacked you personally (not that this is right, I am just trying to find an explanation) because it really seems that you refuse to see some things.
I don't think you are in bad faith
And the reason why PIAers go on confuting your theories
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Originally posted by Uncle Benny
You only have to spend a short time on MFH (Maccas Fun House) to realise it`s a front and a sham.
Like you said, who would dedicate so much time to debunking a "hoax"? If it were truly a hoax, I bet there wouldn't be so much evidence supporting it.
Originally posted by magnolia_xx
Faulcon, I wonder how you have the nerve to post such a ridiculously flattened photo of Paul McCartney and go on saying that it is a proof of his replacement.
This is why you are considered not believable by PIAers.
Originally posted by edmond dantes
Just an issue of logic.
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Originally posted by edmond dantes
Just an issue of logic.
How ironic. The forensics proves that the facial features don't match.
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Ears
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Oh, & Focrates, whether Paul's eyes were brown or hazel, that still != green.
But keep on trying to convince people the difference in eye color is b/c of "camera lighting" or some "rare eye disease" Paul had. lol
Hazel
This iris shows a mixture of brown, green, and amber colors.
Hazel eyes are due to a combination of Rayleigh scattering and a moderate amount of melanin in the iris' anterior border layer.[7][25] Hazel eyes often appear to shift in color from a light brown to a dark golden-green. A number of studies using three-point scales have assigned hazel to be the medium-color between the lightest shade of blue and darkest shade of brown. Hazel mostly consists of Brown and Green. The dominant color in the eye can either be green or light brown/gold.[46][47][48][49][50][51][52] This can sometimes produce a multicolored iris, i.e., an eye that is light brown near the pupil and charcoal or amber/dark green on the outer part of the iris (and vice versa) when observed in sunlight.
If you are one of those lucky people that have hazel eyes, you can change the look of them as fast as you can apply new makeup. All of the colors that are contained in your peepers can be brought out, one by one, with a few makeup tips
for changing your hazel eyes.
Originally posted by edmond dantes
That is a lie. Even the people behind that article say it is not proof that is two different people. If they don't claim that they have forensic proof, how can you?
Originally posted by edmond dantes
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Oh, & Focrates, whether Paul's eyes were brown or hazel, that still != green.
Hazel eyes can look green.
Hazel eyes can look green.
Do you people even know what the definition of "lie" is? The fact is that Paul & Faul don't have the same other eyes, no matter how you try to rationalize it.