It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Paul McCartney died in 1966 - replaced by Billy Shepherd

page: 46
33
<< 43  44  45    47  48  49 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 07:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Excitable_Boy
 


I read your post and had a good laugh. I'm sorry it cost you 1,000 points but at least, finally, something has been said about the way this thread is going.

Whether people agree with Faulcon or not she, at least, has been polite throughout and shown some integrity in providing me with a video I requested.

She didn't know why I wanted it, but was sure enough of her argument to present it anyway. (I had no motive except to supply something which gave people a chance to have a really good look at Paul / Faul - whoever they thought it was).




posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 10:21 AM
link   
Maybe Paul had a neck transplant while he was going thru the series of painful surgeries to transform his face.





Sorry to be a party pooper, but that ain't Paul.


[edit on 19-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 10:26 AM
link   
I can't believe people thought this was Paul. That's just scary





I'm happy those scientists did a biometrical analysis of the 2 to prove they're not the same person & everything, but some people can just tell by looking.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 10:26 AM
link   
I agree, if you don't like this thread, don't post - I also read this website you posted - and I also saw Doug and Dave's confession that they made ALL the crop circles... so if you believe Doug and Dave's confession, that means ALL crop circles were made by 'them' and they didn't make one word up or was coaxed by anyone.

Anyone can confess anything - doesn't make it true. It's also unfortunate you dissed the entire Italian study from experts. You know more than they do? I doubt it. What do you want?!? You won't accept Illuminati as any part of the explanation as to 'why', so what will you accept?

I saw the Letterman interview - and Paul touches his nose just before he talks, generally an indicator what is coming is a lie - body language and mini-facials are more revealing than the words. He also referred to "Paul" as "he" and not "I"... and unless he was intentionally playing around at the end of his story, his face shows a ton of stress and very uncomfortable with it - and I also wonder why that story was the topic of discussion anyway instead of his music or life??? To keep the rumor alive?

If you're a staunch believer, fine. I also wish you would provide something other than insults to the posters - you haven't answered any of my questions either - go start your own post Paul Is Alive if it bothers you that much.


Originally posted by pmexplorer

Originally posted by pmexplorer

www.tlcgraphic.com...


I got the idea of posting the same material again from you faulcon, cheers.

Now if you would, please take a look. Shame that your beloved photos
are being exposed for what they really are, a sham, just like this whole
theory.

You still haven't offered a decent explanation on the family and friends question.
It would be nigh on impossible for that number of people to be convinced.

The 'illuminati' is your safety blanket here, as I've said before, as soon as the heat gets too much, it's your get out of jail card isn't it.
"Oh well you wouldn't understand because the illuminati were involved''
etc. And then post random links which are totally irrelevant to the subject matter but some of the more gullible ones on here who will be sucked in by anything remotely conspiracy related will take it as fact despite the lack of any evidence / proof of their existence or how all this was carried out and by whom.

So save it.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by faulconandsnowjob
 


Honestly I don't see a lot of difference in the photos - but I also know we aren't mentally programmed to see the differences, only the similarities. I did notice a huge difference in eye color and some difference in the nose and of course the question about height... which hasn't been answered to my satisfaction.

The Italian forensics was awesome - translation a little difficult but totally understandable and is the most credible "opinion" on the issue yet....

Open-minds are a wonderful thing... fortunately the Illuminati count on the masses having closed ones...



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 11:36 AM
link   
Kshaund, that was a really excellent analysis of Faul on Letterman. Someone else mentioned his shifty eyes...

But yes, you're right. People have been programmed to see the similarities, not the differences. I think that's why the "blue" album has the lads in virtually the same position & place as the "Please Please Me" cover. It's just part of creating the illusion.




posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 11:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by aorAki


Geez bud, if you don't like it, then don't post.
All throughout this thread you have insulted people outright and deviously and haven't noted anything thjat has been said while continually pushing your line (which is fine and debate is good (except that you use ad hominem attacks rather than just using the evidence itself).

I'm starting to wonder whether you are Faul?


Wow, what an over-reaction!

I haven't insulted anyone mate. I'm entitled to my opinion as much as you are. I have stated my reasons (not that I should ever need to) more than once for refuting these silly allegations.
Apart from calling this whole hoax nonsense, which it is as Sir Paul McCartney is very much alive as we all know (except Faulcon and a few others here Like yourself who are in denial)

''If you don't like it, don't post'' - if people like me didn't post there would be no debate, this forum would be full of people like Faulcon who blindly believe in such theories despite there being little or no evidence
to support said claim unless you count unreliable edited photographs and dodgy youtube videos collated by other ''PiD'' 'experts' trying to make a name for themselves on the internet and sucker in the gullible of this world.

"I'm starting to wonder whether you are Faul?"

Bravo. Yes you got me, I have managed to deceive my friends, family, bandmates, colleagues and acquaintances for over forty years, aswell as continuing the beatles legacy and having a highly successful music career, not bad for a stooge eh? The illuminati are my best mates, we are having dinner tonight.


So it's okay for Faulcon and co. to completely ignore my posts in which I have posted information which refutes her and others Sir Paul conspiracy beliefs yet when I take her to task and debunk the nonsense she continually posts (repetitively I might add,)you have a problem with that?

This thread is a farce. You have a little group of believers (who I suspect all post on other 'PiD' sites also), backing each other up and regurgitating posts and quotes from other 'PiD' sites to prove their point.
Anyone with a bit of cop on like myself or Wally Hope who also saw through this poorly contructed theory is immediately branded the enemy and diregarded as being delusional or lacking in in intelligence for not having the sense to believe that Illuminati etc are responsible for the whole lot.


"Why don't you start a Paul is Alive thread?''

Er, why would I need to start a thread telling someone a basic fact is true?
Should I also start one claiming that Barack Obama is really the President of the USA or that the sky is blue? I'm sure the moderators would love to have such valuable threads on their boards huh?


[edit on 19-7-2009 by pmexplorer]



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 11:55 AM
link   
I guess I shouldn't have expected some people to believe Paul was replaced just b/c some "scientists" w/ their fancy "scientific methodology" say he was. lol

Pmexplorer, you really need to re-evaluate who is in denial about this. I know you want to cling to your beliefs, but it's just an illusion that that is Paul. Paul has been gone a long time. It's sad, but true. What's the use in pretending it's not?

Sometimes I wish I could live in the fantasy world some people live in. I bet it's a nice place where everything they say on the news is true & the govt really is here to help. lol



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
I guess I shouldn't have expected some people to believe Paul was replaced just b/c some "scientists" w/ their fancy "scientific methodology" say he was. lol

Pmexplorer, you really need to re-evaluate who is in denial about this. I know you want to cling to your beliefs, but it's just an illusion that that is Paul. Paul has been gone a long time. It's sad, but true. What's the use in pretending it's not?

Sometimes I wish I could live in the fantasy world some people live in. I bet it's a nice place where everything they say on the news is true & the govt really is here to help. lol


"Scientists''? what are you on about now?

Faulcon, you'd make a great politician.

"Believe in me, I have the answers'' etc etc when all you have is a very weak conspiracy theory which originated as a 1960's hoax but was completely taken out of context over the years and the fact that people are still being taken in by it to this day is hilarious.
And now you're trying to pass it off as the truth with the weakest of
'evidence'.

I'm picturing John Lennon up there in heaven or wherever awaits us after death (maybe the illuminati decide that too) and laughing his rear end off that people are still debating whether Paul died in this day and age.

I fell sorry for you, really, devoting so much time into trying to prove the unprovable.

Oh and you can save your sweeping generalisations like 'I bet you believe everything you are told etc. etc.'. Don't insult my intelligence just because your alleged story about Paul McCartney is not being taken in by everyone.

There are far far far too many questions which you simply cannot answer for this story of yours to be true.
You can't even answer the simplest ones and most expected questions without referring to the illuminati for god's sake.
Yet when asked to go into detail on that subject you either a) throw up another unrelated youtube video or b) mock me for not knowing all there is to know about the illuminati and what 'they do' etc etc and repeat
until some of your cohorts wade in with their 'why don't you post somewhere else' retorts until the subject is changed sufficiently so that in your next post you can bring up the same old rubbish pictures and comparitive nonsense for which I posted a link which legitimately ridicules them and exposes them for what they are, a sham.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 01:02 PM
link   
Unless you have a "Dr." in front of your name, pmexplorer, I think I'm going to go w/ the experts on this one. I'm very sorry the scientific evidence didn't support your theory. Tough break. But here's a suggestion: duplicate their experiment & see if you come up w/ the same results. If you can't duplicate their findings, well, then, maybe you can refute their conclusion that Paul was replaced. I think the burden of proof has shifted to you. Just jumping up & down & insisting it's the same guy b/c you say so isn't going to cut it. Sorry.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 01:06 PM
link   
Significant scene from AHDN:



I bet the phonies are much easier to handle!



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Significant scene from AHDN:





What's significant about it exactly?



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:40 PM
link   
How could AHDN, that came out in 1963, have anything to do with an incident that supposedly happened in 1966?

Because the guy says, 'You can be replaced', to George?



Your lack of comprehension skills and understanding is astounding.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:40 PM
link   
Watch it & try to figure out why I posted it.

And AHDN came out in 1964.

I'm wondering why the mods don't do anything about the steady stream of insults coming from Wally Hope? Trust me, I don't have a high opinion of your observational skills, but I don't resort to throwing insults in every post.


[edit on 19-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wally Hope

Your lack of comprehension skills and understanding is astounding.


That's rich coming from someone who can't seem to grasp a scientifically proven fact that Paul was replaced. lol



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wally Hope
How could AHDN, that came out in 1963, have anything to do with an incident that supposedly happened in 1966?

It really doesn't surprise me that you would fail to recognize the significance of that scene.

[edit on 19-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:49 PM
link   
reply to post by faulconandsnowjob
 


Yes '64 sry, makes not the slightest difference to my point though.

And no, I already made my guess and I'm all out of other ideas, so you're gonna have to explain it mate.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
I'm wondering why the mods don't do anything about the steady stream of insults coming from Wally Hope? Trust me, I don't have a high opinion of your observational skills, but I don't resort to throwing insults in every post.


I'm wondering why the mods haven't close this spam laden thread.

And that wasn't an insult, it was a well founded observation.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wally Hope
I'm wondering why the mods haven't close this spam laden thread.




That would certainly make things easier on the PIAers wouldn't it? You wouldn't have to face any more talk about Paul being dead and replaced. Well, if you are so sure that he is always the same Paul, then why bother with such a ridiculous thread? You don't have to have the mods close it down, you can just not post or visit here anymore. Problem solved.

But the fact that so many people who believe that Paul was never replaced can't seem to stay away from here leads me to believe that they know on some level that there is something to this story and out of insecurity they come here to try and stop it.

[edit on 19-7-2009 by SednaSon]



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 06:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by SednaSon

But the fact that so many people who believe that Paul was never replaced can't seem to stay away from here leads me to believe that they know on some level that there is something to this story and out of insecurity they come here to try and stop it.

Excellent point. They really have to fight hard to try to disprove PID. If it were so "ridiculous," wouldn't it be easy to debunk? And yet, it hasn't been debunked at all. In fact, quite the opposite.

I think you're right that at some level they know it's true, but they don't want to face it. No one wants to think about the possibility that something really bad might have happened to Paul. No one wants to think that they might have been lied to for so long, & then failed to recognize it. It's disturbing, for sure. But that's no reason to refuse to accept the truth.

I'd be happy to do a hermeneutical interpretive analysis of that scene from AHDN, but Wally is going to have to ask nicely. Say pretty please lol



new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 43  44  45    47  48  49 >>

log in

join