It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well, so far my main theory on why you guys do not respond well to logic and reason, and see past this fantasy, is you either have an unfortunate lack of comprehension skills, and you really didn't understand what I said, per my quote.
Or maybe it means he's just getting aangry (sic) over all the people who keep trying to say he isn't who he thinks he is?
you guys do not respond well to logic and reason
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
I think you just can't argue w/ the law on this, Wally, so you have to resort to insults. That is so transparent. I understand exactly what you said. I think you kind of shot yourself in the foot on that one. lol
If you'll notice, the date of the article was 2005. That was before there was much attention to PID.
Originally posted by Wally Hope
Of course it's not the same voice!
It's a voice that has had ten years of maturity and practice, and a billion songs sung, between your two takes there my dear...
And how does that make any difference? Please explain
Or maybe it means he's just getting aangry over all the people who keep trying to say he isn't who he thinks he is?
but I didn't say because that would have been an insult
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
I don't see how it's "logical" or "reasonable" to believe that someone can change his eye color, transform his face, grow 2 inches in their mid 20's. Do you know of anyone besides Paul who has managed such a remarkable feat? B/c I don't.
Oh yeah sorry, cause none of those things are true?
Because you have no evidence that any of it's true?
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
I pointed out that the US legal system considers a voice to be an "immutable characteristic," and therefore, not subject to change.
Since the article came out in 2005 before PID received much renewed attention, this argument doesn't work to explain his macabre paintings, b/c there weren't all these people saying "he isn't who he thinks he is."
Right. B/c you would never do that. lol
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Except that we've shown that they are. All of them.
Go back & read what I posted on the law. Photographs are evidence, or do I have to re-post the laws w/ "photographs" bolded this time?
How do you explain the different faces, different heights, & different eye color? You can't. You don't even try. But you admitted the voices are different. Gotcha. lol
If you want to argue w/ me about what constitutes evidence, you better start citing to some law, b/c your opinion doesn't really carry a lot of weight.
Originally posted by Wally Hope
I showed you a teenage Paul, and Paul as he is now, their skulls match exactly
Originally posted by Wally Hope
Now you prove me wrong (that the skulls are not the same pls, not silly eye color stuff).
Originally posted by Wally Hope
Here's another idea, why don't you email Paul, or Faul if you'd prefer, and ask him what colour his eyes are? He reads all his emails. Can you say hazel?
[edit on 16-7-2009 by Wally Hope]
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Glazier also says:
"Whoever this person is, he can certainly play well. But I still think there's something missing. Is that voice singing 'Yesterday' the same voice that sang it in 1965? You decide."
If someone is going to spend so much time & energy on PID, he obviously thinks there's something to it. I can understand why he doesn't want to just come out & say that's not Paul.
berenike: I was looking at this from a different angle.
If Glazier has been researching for so many years and says that he doesn't know if Paul is dead, how can any of us be so sure? Either way.
I found this quote of Glazier's in the same article rather ambiguous:
Having visited Israel eight times, and being instrumental in the establishment of the John Lennon Peace Forest in the Galilee, Glazier is overjoyed that a Beatle is finally appearing in Israel. "Finally, the people of Israel will get to see the person who is allegedly Paul. And make sure you write 'he said that with a smile,'" said Glazier.
Why would he want people to know he said it with a smile?
[edit on 16-7-2009 by berenike]
Originally posted by MightyAl
Paul must be laughing his head off about people wasting their time discussing a non-existing conspiracy such as this one.
I'd rather spend more time figuring out Tavistock, or figuring out what the Illuminati does to the most famous artists on the planet. How they manipulate them, if at all.
Apart from that...I think Faul and Paul look EXACTLY alike. No need to compare.
When artists die, they don't get replaced, so why should Paul McCartney?
Originally posted by aorAki
It wasn't their skulls you measured, fully.