It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Paul McCartney died in 1966 - replaced by Billy Shepherd

page: 105
33
<< 102  103  104    106  107  108 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by switching yard
What was the real reason the Beatles broke up at the end of 1969? Set aside the lore and legend about the business disagreements and the thing about "wedding bells broke up that old gang of mine" that Faul is fond of saying.

John, George & Ringo all got married earlier, & that didn't break up the band.


At the end of 1969, it was like "Right then, it's over. Contract is up!"

Seems like if you're going to end something big, doing it at the end of a decade would make sense.




posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by switching yard
Isn't it just a lovely coincidence that the huge remaster release is scheduled for 9-9-9?

Yeah, a "coincidence" just like how the Beijing Olympics started on 8/8/08 at 8:08:08 pm. lol

But yes, numerology & astrology are quite important to the Illuminati. They want people to think it's bunk, but that's just misdirection - they use it all the time.



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uncle Benny

Why would Pauls family comply?

- They may have had little or no choice/been threatened... that if they spoke out there would be reprecussions.

In addition, they could have been bribed. They could have been threatened w/ being labelled as "crazy" like poor Tony Rosato from SNL. Maybe they were afraid they'd meet w/ an "unfortunate accident," etc.


- Pauls legacy and name would also live on through Bill/Faul. Any future successes of Bills would be attributed to Paul (Bill being a double would never fully receive the recognition).

If they had known the crap Bill would churn out, they might have preferred to keep Paul's musical legacy untainted by songs like "Spies Like Us."



Now here`s a clip you may be interested in seeing -

I like how Bill made Paul's dad pay for his own beer. What a cheapskate.



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
ely makes me think of how they try to discredit the forensic experts.


It makes this thread a lot more pleasant since I put pm on ignore - don't feel obligated to read it hoping it actually contains substance once in a while.

I love ignore. It's harder for them to derail the thread when no one can hear their little tantrums!


Faulcon adopting the old 'if I can't see them, they aren't really there' approach I see.

How mature!


The piddlers, sorry pidders moan about how the people arguing the contrary here are disinfo agents and all this other rubbish but they don't even have the decency to engage in the discussion.
The words 'running scared' spring to mind.

Faulcon earlier...



Remember she can't see this and so won't take offence.

[edit on 31-8-2009 by pmexplorer]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob

Originally posted by switching yard
Isn't it just a lovely coincidence that the huge remaster release is scheduled for 9-9-9?

Yeah, a "coincidence" just like how the Beijing Olympics started on 8/8/08 at 8:08:08 pm. lol

But yes, numerology & astrology are quite important to the Illuminati. They want people to think it's bunk, but that's just misdirection - they use it all the time.


Here's some synchronicity - earlier today I deleted a post I was about to make because I didn't want to be laughed off the thread.

My question was - has anyone given Paul's chart to an astrologer for a full analysis to see if any clues can be found as to his fate?

A horary astrologer would be best - I found a forum full of them the other day but they weren't keen for anyone to join who wasn't experienced in it.

I also looked up Paul's name on a numerology site and the results for that were quite interesting. Here's the site:

www.paulsadowski.com...

[edit on 31-8-2009 by berenike]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by berenike

Here's some synchronicity - earlier today I deleted a post I was about to make because I didn't want to be laughed off the thread.

A horary astrologer would be best - I found a forum full of them the other day but they weren't keen for anyone to join who wasn't experienced in it.

I also looked up Paul's name on a numerology site and the results for that were quite interesting.



You may aswell call up one of those so called psychic mediums for all the good
it will do you.



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by pmexplorer
 


Good evening to you - I hope you are well and enjoying the Bank Holiday.

There is a big difference between a competent astrologer and a psychic medium. For one thing, a reading an astrologer gives you can be more easily verified by another such person.

There's far less room for the frauds and charlatans who, sadly, give the genuine ones a bad name.

[edit on 31-8-2009 by berenike]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by pmexplorer

Faulcon adopting the old 'if I can't see them, they aren't really there' approach I see.


I wouldn't worry; seems she's given up trying to make her case now -- all she's got left is insults:


Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob

If they had known the crap Bill would churn out, they might have preferred to keep Paul's musical legacy untainted by songs like "Spies Like Us."



Now here`s a clip you may be interested in seeing -

I like how Bill made Paul's dad pay for his own beer. What a cheapskate.



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 01:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by berenike
My question was - has anyone given Paul's chart to an astrologer for a full analysis to see if any clues can be found as to his fate?


Yes. I'm still looking thru my emails, but I found this from an astrologer friend who has studied Paul's chart & said it didn't look so good for him btw 8/66 - 10/66. The quote was:

"Paul, from late August to early October [1966] is real bad."


I also looked up Paul's name on a numerology site and the results for that were quite interesting.

Trying to get more info still, but recently got this from someone knowledgeable about numerology on Beatles numerology:

"The beatles is a good name, but the numerology is unfortunate. It is mysterious and secretive. I should have known even though i was surprised that the name equals a number 7. Usually it means that fame will not be likely or if fame happens then there is secrecy and deceptiveness behind it... The 7 equals all of the deception and secrecy..."

Anyway, like I said, Illuminati seem to think a lot of numerology & astrology, so there must be something to it.


[edit on 31-8-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 01:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by berenike
reply to post by pmexplorer
 


Good evening to you - I hope you are well and enjoying the Bank Holiday.

There is a big difference between a competent astrologer and a psychic medium. For one thing, a reading an astrologer gives you can be more easily verified by another such person.

There's far less room for the frauds and charlatans who, sadly, give the genuine ones a bad name.

[edit on 31-8-2009 by berenike]


And a very good evening to you berenike.


I am quite well and I am enjoying this rather splendid Monday evening
thank you very much as I hope you are also.

Frankly, and this is my own personal belief, I have absolutely no faith in astrologists, tarot readers, numerologists, mediums and so on.


I don't think there are any genuine ones.

These guys say it all for me:

www.youtube.com...

I realise this post is slightly off topic but it is relevant to the post above.



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 01:35 PM
link   
"Paul" referring to "himself" in the 3rd person (again):


Macca gets bored of being a Beatle

... "You get fed up being him. You're always that guy," he said...

www.andhranews.net...


Yes, I could see how it would get old always pretending to be someone else :-P




[edit on 31-8-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
"Paul" referring to "himself" in the 3rd person (again):

Macca gets bored of being a Beatle

... "You get fed up being him. You're always that guy," he said...

Yes, I could see how it would get old always pretending to be someone else :-P



Allow me:

What Faulcon surprisingly decided to edit out of this little concoction was.......


Sir Paul McCartney has said that many times he gets bored of being a Beatle.

New Delhi, June 4 : Sir Paul McCartney has said that many times he gets bored of being a 'Beatle'.

The legendary rocker has confessed that many times he gets tired of the fame that comes from being a part of the 'Fab Four', reports the China Daily.

"You get fed up being him. You're always that guy," he said.

He added: "If I was Bruce Springsteen, I might get fed up being Bruce Springsteen. I might want to be the kid I was growing up, when I didn't have that image to live up to

Although McCartney hates the pressure surrounding his success, he still loves playing live.


Come on Faulcon things haven't gotten that bad have they?





[edit on 31-8-2009 by pmexplorer]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 01:41 PM
link   












[edit on 31-8-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob


The funniest thing is those images ^ seem to be spot on, is Faulcon stepping over the fence and starting to see the light? Judging by that almost perfect Paul / Paul fade it seems so! Good on you Faulcon I knew you'd come around.


Selective quoting followed up by more of the same old stuff.

The faulcon trademark, even I can see from the above that the
older Paul pics have been carefully cropped and played with so as to not
line up with the ones of the younger Paul.

Even though a blind man could see that making such a comparison is completely futile when there is different facial expressions, differing points of camera persective not to mention lighting and everything else for that matter.

Faulcon really is clutching at her few remaining straws now.

How you 'pid' believers have the cheek to post this sort of rubbish
is beyond me.

[edit on 31-8-2009 by pmexplorer]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 02:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by pmexplorer
The funniest thing is those images ^ seem to be spot on, is Faulcon stepping over the fence and starting to see the light?

Selective quoting followed up by more of the same old stuff.

Even though a blind man could see that making such a comparison is completely futile when there is different facial expressions, differing points of camera persective not to mention lighting and everything else for that matter.

Faulcon really is clutching at her few remaining straws now.

How you 'pid' believers have the cheek to post this sort of rubbish
is beyond me.




I`ll tell you what`s funnier... you here all day poorly attempting to debunk what you believe is rubbish.


Judging by your "rationel" ALL photo comparisons are OUT!



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 02:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uncle Benny
I`ll tell you what`s funnier... you here all day poorly attempting to debunk what you believe is rubbish.

What's up w/ that? I can't even think of a "hoax" I'd spend time on trying to debunk... Why? I can tell you why I'm doing this. I find it a grave injustice that Paul was blamed for "My Love" - lol :-P


Judging by your "rationel" ALL photo comparisons are OUT!

Maybe they should take it up w/ the legal system if they don't like the fact that photos can be used to establish identity. lol

[edit on 31-8-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 02:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uncle Benny

I`ll tell you what`s funnier... you here all day poorly attempting to debunk what you believe is rubbish.


Judging by your "rationel" ALL photo comparisons are OUT!


Another claiming I'm here ''all day''
Poorly attempting eh?

What I know is rubbish.The posts above prove as much.

Faulcon's selective quoting where she tries to make someting out
of nothing from a Paul McCartney interview. Care to defend / explain that rather than immaturely trying deflect attention from her poorly constructed posts by directing your bile at me yet again?
Photo comparisons are fine, fine until they are manipulated to try and prove there are discrepancies which simply are not there. The first one she chose to use actually proves there is nothing in this farce as from the pics you can see the older and younger Paul match up just fine. Hilarious really, she's debunking herself!

And it's rationale not "rationel'', something you so clearly lack.




[edit on 31-8-2009 by pmexplorer]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Maybe they should take it up w/ the legal system if they don't like the fact that photos can be used to establish identity. lol
[edit on 31-8-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

Maybe you should take your photos to the legal system if you think they' identify an impostor.

And don't worry that they might kill you -- if they do, that just proves you were right!



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 03:13 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 03:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uncle Benny

Finally we agree - I would say most of what you`ve written on this thread is utter garbage, but don`t be too harsh on yourself.


Ah bless, poor uncle benny has to resort to the same old routine
of retorting with personal abuse.

It says a lot about you as an individual though and the desperation
of the 'pid' posts from the last few pages of this thread.

Quite frankly ,I don't give a damn what you think, you'd be mistaken in believing that I do, much the same as you are mistaken in believing in this ridiculous theory.


Originally posted by Uncle Benny
that`s why I put quotation marks around it and the word your in front of it


Yes of course that's what you meant.


[edit on 31-8-2009 by pmexplorer]




top topics



 
33
<< 102  103  104    106  107  108 >>

log in

join