It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waynos
Ah yes, but that doesn't stop you having a go at Airbus where there is also not a design flaw, see the double standard here? You see I knew someone would leap to the defence of the DC-10 and lo and behold if it isn't one of the very members thats having a go at Airbus and with far less reason. But hey, I'm just a sneaky European
Originally posted by Travellar
depends on whether you have a choice of airlines. For example, If you're flying on Southwest Airlines, I can assure you you'll be flying in a Boeing 737. It's the only aircraft they use. (It's also a big part of thier business model, as it reduces parts inventory, different airframes for pilots/mechs to qualify and stay proficient for, ect.)
Originally posted by bigx01
The defense of the dc-10 ............etc
Originally posted by FredT
So would a major redesign be needed will be the question.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
[That is why they are confident despite - or in fact because of - this test.
Originally posted by FredT
This is abit of a PR nightmare. i do understand Boeing will spin stuff like this as well.
how is the testing of a different wing configuration going to validate the model if the actual wing flying is different (even slightly)?
Should not all aircraft producers be required to actually test this type of failure?
Originally posted by FredT
I will but even so, why would the test a sub standard wing if they knew it would fail. This is abit of a PR nightmare. i do understand Boeing will spin stuff like this as well.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
The minds of many in the US are already made up anyway so who cares if they become even more closed and chauvinist about Airbus, they are not the whole world's buyers and operators or even passangers?