It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For all recorded time, true believers have fought for faiths that define their societies. Their horrors have stalked us through the millennia, and in the 21st century we have reached a precipice. Competing forces of faith struggle for dominance on a geopolitical stage, wielding weapons of mass destruction. Faiths impose profound limitations on human potential, and propagate thought processes that remain among the greatest inspirations for individual acts of violence. Now they threaten all humanity. We must declare independence from faith, or fall from the precipice.
It is the mission of The Universist Movement to provide humanity the vibrant and positive alternative to traditional religions that millions are seeking. That alternative is Universism.
Traditional religions proclaimed authoritative answers for the most important questions we will ever face. Universism announces the true hope of an individual quest, understanding the reality that no one knows for certain. We are each grappling with the mystery; finally engaging in the true human experience.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Has anyone else heard of it? I like the idea, but think that organizing an idea into a belief with a following is doing exactly what it preaches against.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
If I believe in free open thought, and don't believe in other religious dogma, then am I automatically a universalist? Once they seperate themselves, then they begin the downward spiral that is dogmatic religion.
Faiths impose profound limitations on human potential, and propagate thought processes that remain among the greatest inspirations for individual acts of violence. Now they threaten all humanity. We must declare independence from faith, or fall from the precipice.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
I think my concern was in the phrasing of some of their quotes, such as
Faiths impose profound limitations on human potential, and propagate thought processes that remain among the greatest inspirations for individual acts of violence. Now they threaten all humanity. We must declare independence from faith, or fall from the precipice.
Personally I can see many instances where this isn’t true, but would I be able to openly discuss this with Universalists and be encouraged to continue?
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Faiths impose profound limitations on human potential, and propagate thought processes that remain among the greatest inspirations for individual acts of violence. Now they threaten all humanity. We must declare independence from faith, or fall from the precipice.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Faiths impose profound limitations on human potential, and propagate thought processes that remain among the greatest inspirations for individual acts of violence. Now they threaten all humanity. We must declare independence from faith, or fall from the precipice.
Originally posted by Bob LaoTse
Personally, I think that that statement, all by itself, sums up the potential problems with such a movement. It's clearly, itself, a credo-- a statement of belief-- an article of faith.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This article seems too much like the Uncola. The religion against religion. The Unreligion. Ha-ha-ha.