It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marg6043
The only problem is that it was all from the nineties and is very well know that one of the reasons for invations after the MWDs were no found was because Saddam thought about making MWDs or had intentions of making them.
No that he had them.
Pity. it proves nothing, just another efford to justify what is already done and deal with can we move on or the Republican party is so scare of losing the congress that has to bring this all back as a reminder.
[edit on 16-2-2006 by marg6043]
Originally posted by Regenmacher
And your point is showing us you lack the intelligence to fathom what defines hypocrisy or timing?
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Also you lack the comprehension of what I wrote.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
So what part did I argue in regards to Saddam should not be ousted?
Originally posted by Regenmacher
You seem to be void of seeing the big picture and assume things out of thin air, cause your so wrapped up in parroting partisan nonsense, you lack the ability to see things independently or outside the box. It has nothing to do with your fragile ego and how you think everything is a personal attack. If I wanted to evoke your dictatorial blather, the header would of had your name on it.
The Saddam Tapes
Intelligence Summit
Arlington, VA
February 18, 2006
Technical Points
Audio was segmented to fit the number of words readable per Powerpoint slide.
Translation was more literal than otherwise.
[Unintelligible] can not be clearly heard. Words in italics are heard but not understood because they are local Tikriti dialect, Baath Party jargon, technical, etc.
........................
Removal of Warheads
From Tape ISGC-2003-M0003997
Beginning of Tape
Unidentified Male
I notice, sir, that the people’s resolution to serve the battle is very high. They can not insult our resolve, no matter the time.
This brings me to what I notice among them. Despite the pressure of their surveillance, and our not using all our capabilities in the missile area - the time period is not important to them. What is the time period going to be?
For us, the factories mujzab [indistinct] in our fields. The factories are present. How much material do we have? How much equipment do we have?
The factories remain, in the mind they remain. Our spirit is with us. Four days ago there was the Said Madari missile, three Hijaba missiles,
We put them out from what was available from what he have done a year ago, two years ago, and five years ago. Based solely on the time period, and they take note of the time period, they can’t account for our will, which grows stronger with each passing day.
Originally posted by Briggs
maybe you didnt listen to the tapes / cd's .
i guess it wouldnt matter even if you heard saddam himself in person tell you , that he was going to make them and use them to kill people.
america will always be evil in your eyes.
Originally posted by marg6043
Why should I? is Saddam still a tread to me? no, is Saddam a tread to you? no, is Saddam a tread to the US? no.
Originally posted by marg6043
The media is doing a great job spreading the propaganda.
Originally posted by marg6043
Did he kill anybody in the West? no, did he kill anybody close to you? no, did he kill anybody next to me? no.
Originally posted by marg6043
Saddam tapes are old, they were not that important earlier or before the invasion so now you want me to believe. . . another propaganda stunt because public opinion is still very low.
Originally posted by marg6043
The topic is getting old, and so your comment in regards to me.
Need a better line to justify the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Jehosephat...the ones to give most of the wmd and other military weaponry to Iraq, and to Iran now, were Russia, China, and a few European countries....
The country that Saddam owed the most money to was Russia, because of the arm deals they had, even when the sanctions were in place.
BTW, in case you don't know the sanctions didn't work because countries like Russia were still selling banned weaponry to iraq in exchange for oil. Perhaps you have heard of the Oil for Food scandal? If you haven't do a search and you will see what the sanctions worked for.
Originally posted by Jehosephat
..........................
next time you do the research and stop trying to slant obsured facts and assmutions to support your opinion and not the truth
Originally posted by Muaddib
Of course Saddam is not a threat anymore, he was ousted.
I doubt it is propaganda. The intelligence agencies are at this moment discussing what they found in those tapes as well as other evidence they have gathered and what has been learned.
First, I doubt you can say for certain whether or not Saddam's terrorist connections lead to the death of Americans in the U.S.
He did have terrorist connections and according to several international intelligence agencies he was planning on killing Americans in U.S. soil as well as abroad.
Not according to international intelligence agencies which are at this moment discussing those tapes as part of their summit Marg.
Why is it that this "topic is getting old" yet when old pictures of Abu Ghraib which the media did not release before but had them is suddenly something new?
Don't you see the irony?
Originally posted by Muaddib
I ask you to stop the insults and you respond with more rethoric and insults?....
What is the matter Regenmacher, is your intelligence so high and mighty that you don't need to present any evidence to back your argument but instead you resort to insulting those who disagree with you?
Are you once again going to anwser with more insults and belittling comments, or are you going to present "facts" to back up your argument?
Originally posted by Muaddib
I can see exactly what you meant in your response. You regard those who disagree with you as "dogs doing their master's work" but you don't seem to comprehend that people can disagree with your views and points without being the puppets of anyone else. i guess for you someone has to agree with you on everything in order for you to regard them as "intelligent."
Originally posted by Muaddib
Hey Regenmacher, leave the insults and the belittling comments out of the forums, or tell them to someone who cares about what you think....
Originally posted by Muaddib
You first insult my intelligence and "label me or anyone who disagrees with your view as dogs doing their master's work" and now you try to label us as parrots without a mind of our own?.....
You must be extremely naive, and lack the intelligence you are trying to mirror on others, to think your personal insults and belittling comments would not be seen as nothing more than....insults and belittling comments....
Originally posted by Muaddib
I remember somebody arguing that this piece of news was some sort of dismissal to the "new photos of Abu Ghraib" which btw are not new.
......are you going to present "facts" to back up your argument?
Originally posted by Regemmacher
The reason for the timing of this release is what I am looking into because it's old verbatim and would only surface to counteract other promulgation. Everything is released for a reason as in containment level propaganda issued by psyops to muddy the water. In this case it is for obfuscation and damage control since the heat is on from Europe about torture and prisons.
Saddam Tapes Fizzle, Right Chases Ghosts -Jawa Report
See my post here also, the macroview:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Not only are the 12 hours of tapes set to be released to the public by John Loftus tomorrow a fizzling non-event, but the media and many on the Right side of the blogosphere have taken those tapes out of context, twisting them to find hidden meaning where no meaning is to be found.
Without naming names, can I just say that it is totally out of context to read Saddam Hussein's warnings that 'terrorism is coming to America' as a veiled threat. Many on the Right have been so eager to find WMDs in Iraq that they are letting wishful thinking cloud their judgement. The tapes are no 'smoking-gun'.
In fact, the tapes simply seem to confirm what has been known for quite some time. They offer no insight into allegations that WMD were moved to Syria.
Further, it turns out John Loftus is more than a little bit of a nutjob. Don't believe me? Then read this from Debbie Schlussel and this from Right Wing Nut House.
Any speculation that I may have given in the past that the Loftus tapes would be the smoking-gun on the Iraq WMD issue are retracted.
Saddam Tapes or Not, I WON'T Be @ the Intelligence Summit& Here's Why
(CIA's Woolsey, Deutch Cancel, Too) -Debbie Schlussel
My first experience with Mr. Loftus, in 2002--well before FOX News hired him--showed me, glaringly, that he is a fraud. He spoke at a counter-protest to the University of Michigan Palestinian Students Divestment Conference. I was the keynote speaker at the event. At the time, Mr. Loftus had recently filed a lawsuit (which was dismissed) against Islamic Jihad terrorist/founder and South Florida Professor Sami Al-Arian, a man about whom I know, and have written, a great deal.
Mr. Loftus' speech betrayed him to be almost completely ignorant on Mr. Al Arian, Islam in general (claimed Mohammed loved the Jews and treated them well; tell that to the Jews who built Medina, whom Mohammed slaughtered, forcibly converted to Islam, or expelled), and to be a blatant liar. I watched in amazement as he claimed to the large audience assembled, that he was the attorney for INS, Customs, and FBI agents, and others who'd investigated Sami Al-Arian. I know several of those parties, and to my knowledge, none of them have ever been represented by Loftus.
Caution on Loftus and the "smoking gun" -American Thinker
...when John Loftus, the organizer of this weekend’s “Intelligence Summit” came out and said that there was a “smoking gun” in these tapes that proved the existence of WMD in Iraq prior to our invasion, I was skeptical. I remembered from the Duelfer Report that close aides to Saddam had routinely lied to the dictator about his own WMD program so any conversations about WMD on the tapes would have to be listened to bearing that in mind.
And I also had to consider the source himself. Yesterday, I said that Loftus was considered a “gadfly” by the intelligence establishment. As it turns out, I was being too kind by half.
THE SADDAM TAPES AND THEIR SOURCE -Byron York
One might guess that the Sun is not aware of Loftus' other work, but that would be incorrect. In January 2004, the paper published an article on those notorious MoveOn.org ad submissions that compared George W. Bush to Adolf Hitler. The story included a quote from Loftus, who said the ads were basically accurate. "The Bushes played a significant role in bringing money into the Third Reich," Loftus told the paper. "They literally financed Hitler. It was all about the money. It wasn't about the ideology."
SADDAM TAPES: WHY IT’S ALWAYS GOOD TO LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP -Right Wing Nuthouse
A curious gent, this Loftus fellow. It seems also that he is absolutely convinced of a connection between the Enron scandal and…(wait for it) 9/11:
In the article, Loftus reports that the now-defunct energy company had a contract with the Taliban to build a pipeline, and that Vice President Dick Cheney, determined to help out Enron, forbade U.S. intelligence sources from investigating the Enron/Taliban/al Qaeda connection in the months leading up to the September 11 terrorist attacks. After outlining this somewhat Fahrenheit 9/11-like theory, Loftus concludes, “The Enron cover-up confirms that 9/11 was not an intelligence failure or a law enforcement failure (at least not entirely). Instead, it was a foreign policy failure of the highest order. If Congress ever combines its Enron investigation with 9/11, Cheney’s whole house of cards will collapse.”
Does his kookiness rule out the possibility that there might be something valuable on the Saddam tapes? Not necessarily, although for the sake of credibility, one needs to look not only at the message, but the messenger as well.
Furor Erupts Over Recordings of Saddam -NY Sun
CAIRO, Egypt - Two former CIA directors have resigned from the board of the organization planning tomorrow to make public secret recordings of Saddam Hussein and his advisers.
In the last week both John Deutch and James Woolsey abruptly left their positions at Intelligence Summit, according to its president, John Loftus, who said their departure is part of a campaign by the directorate of national intelligence to punish him for releasing the recordings.
The reason both men gave for their resignations was new information they received regarding one of the summit's biggest donors, Michael Cherney, an Israeli citizen who has been denied a visa to enter America because of his alleged ties to the Russian mafia.
Originally posted by Muaddib
You must be extremely naive, and lack the intelligence you are trying to mirror on others, to think your personal insults and belittling comments would not be seen as nothing more than....insults and belittling comments....
...Anything else you would like to add appart from belittling comments and insults? or is that all you have to back your points?
Originally posted by Muaddib
If you do a search on the website i provided above you will find all the agencies and people attending this summit.
Originally posted by curme
Originally posted by Muaddib
If you do a search on the website i provided above you will find all the agencies and people attending this summit.
Do you mean the link that links Ann Coulter, FOX News, FrontPage, News Max, and the World News Daily? That link?
If that is 'non-partisan', I'd hate to see partisan!
EDIT: The images above are from a site advertising on "FrontPage", typical of the site in the 'Links' page.
[edit on 18-2-2006 by curme]
Originally posted by Phoenix
Curme, I never saw where Muaddib made any partisanship claims in his post.
I find it rather curious that rather than dispute the veracity of the information presented you resort to ad hominim attacks on the sourcing of the information instead of the content by making light of conservative blogs the site links to - should I read into that response that the information is correct? but that you disagree with the linked opinions based on preconcieved political belief?
Originally posted by Muaddib
Jehosephat, I believe i have been a member in these forums longer than you, because if you were as old a member as i am you would have seen that several members, including me, have found several pieces of evidence which show that Saddam was lying to the IAEA, he was actively going after wmd and had banned items such as banned missiles, banned empty chemical warheads, as well as other military technology which could only be used for wmd, not to mention tons of documents dealing with wmd, not "just one cd".
Originally posted by Jehosephat
Wow, now we have a personal attack after I went and did the research by myself and all of a sudden there is "otehr information" I didn't find. The Dulfer report proved that Saddam, while speaking much bravado, only SAID he had them, he did NOT actaully have them. There is a big differance.
Originally posted by Jehosephat
I keep saying again. There is a big differance between actaully having WMD and planningto use them. Then trying to get WMD and planning to use them. One certainly allows of the justification for a pre-emptive strike using military force, the other allows for Diplomatic means and using Non-military actions to prevent the former.
(CNN) -- The CIA has in its hands the critical parts of a key piece of Iraqi nuclear technology -- parts needed to develop a bomb program -- that were dug up in a back yard in Baghdad, CNN has learned.
The parts, with accompanying plans, were unearthed by Iraqi scientist Mahdi Obeidi who had hidden them under a rose bush in his garden 12 years ago under orders from Qusay Hussein and Saddam Hussein's then son-in-law, Hussein Kamel.
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraqi officials said they have found four more empty chemical warheads similar to 12 others found last week, the U.N.'s chief weapons inspector said Sunday.
Hans Blix, in Baghdad with top nuclear weapons inspector Mohamed ElBaradei, said on CNN's "Late Edition" that the 12 empty warheads were on the agenda for talks Sunday with Iraqi officials.
"They said they had been surprised themselves" about finding the empty warheads, Blix said. "They were in boxes, never opened -- there were bird droppings on them. But of course they should have been declared and destroyed."
Iraq's WMD Secreted in Syria, Sada Says
By IRA STOLL - Staff Reporter of the Sun
January 26, 2006
The man who served as the no. 2 official in Saddam Hussein's air force says Iraq moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria before the war by loading the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed.
Nizar Nayuf (Nayyouf-Nayyuf), a Syrian journalist who recently defected from Syria to Western Europe and is known for bravely challenging the Syrian regime, said in a letter Monday, January 5, to Dutch newspaper “De Telegraaf,” that he knows the three sites where Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) are kept.
Originally posted by Jehosephat
It has nothing to do with "how long I have been on the forums" please don't make a fool of yourself by dismissing the posts of another just becasue they havn't been registered as long as you have.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
The tapes that were released represent information that should have been made available to the general public both here in the U.S. and around the world. I am curious as to why they were not.
...........................
Originally posted by curme
Do you mean the link that links Ann Coulter, FOX News, FrontPage, News Max, and the World News Daily? That link?
If that is 'non-partisan', I'd hate to see partisan!
EDIT: The images above are from a site advertising on "FrontPage", typical of the site in the 'Links' page.
[edit on 18-2-2006 by curme]
9-11 Commission
Airline Pilots Security Alliance
America's Truth Forum
Americans Against Hate
American Center for Democracy • Center for Study of Corruption
American Enterprise Institute
American Foreign Policy Council
Americans for Safe Israel
Ann Coulter
Anti-Defamation League • International Terrorist Symbols Database
Association of Former Intelligence Officers
CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America)
Campus Watch
Center for Advanced Defense Studies
CENTCOM (United States Central Command)
Center for Security Policy
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies
Colonel Gordon
Committee on the Present Danger
Cooper Republic
Council on Foreign Relations
The Counterterrorism Blog
Daily Alert
DEBKAfile
Delphi Research
Direct Measures International
Dolphinarium Bombing in Tel-Aviv
Discover The Networks
EYE SPY Intelligence Magazine
FBI: Seeking Information Alert
Federation of American Scientists • Intelligence Resource Program
FOX New Channel
The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies • Blog
FrontPage Magazine
Global Justice Group
Global Security
Global Terror Alert
Government Executive
Homeland Defense Journal
Homeland Security US .net
Honest Reporting
ICT (International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism)
ICTOA (International Counter-Terrorism Officers Association)
Institute for the Analysis of Global Security
IntelCenter
Intelligence & Terrorism Information Center
The Intelligence Summit
International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals
Terror Information Bank
Internet Haganah
The Investigative Project
Iranians For Secular Republic
Iraq Coalition Casualty Count / Operation Enduring Freedom U.S. Fatalities Iraq Afghanistan
IsraCast
Jayna Davis
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
Jerusalem NewsWire
Jerusalem Summit
Jihad Watch
JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs)
John Batchelor Show
John Loftus
List of Specially Designated Nationals & Blocked Persons
Little Green Footballs • 9-11 Slide Show
MEMRI (The Middle East Media Research Institute)
MEMRI TV Monitor Project
Michelle Malkin
Militant Islam Monitor
Middle East Facts
The Middle East Forum
MIPT (National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism)
MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base
Money Laundering Alert
Navexpress (The Black Day)
National Military Intelligence Association
Never Forget. Never Again. VIDEO
NewsMax
The New York Times
Northeast Intelligence Network
One Jerusalem
Operation Shiloh
PoliceOne
Project One Soul VIDEO
Ready.gov (DHS)
Regime Change Iran
Rewards for Justice
Richard Horowitz
Richard Miniter
Rewards Fund
The Saudi Institute
Security News Online
SITE (Search for International Terrorist Entities) Institute
Society for Internet Research
Soldiers Memorial Fund
South Asian Terrorism Portal
Strategic Policy Consulting, Inc.
Students Supporting a Secure Israel
Surveillance Escort Services
Terrorism Research Center
Terrorist Warning
Topix.net
Tracking al-Qaeda
Tracking The Threat
Truth USA
Voice of America
Walid Phares
The Wall of Americans
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
World Net Daily
Weekly Blitz
World Threats
Yahoo
Zombie Time