Rare footage shows laser guidance system directing flight 175 into the south tower!

There are web pages on TV fakery: on videos of "Flight 175" slipping into the South Tower are falsified.

The sound of pulse rocket is heard as independent film maker gets the
hit on the North Tower. That is analyzed as not an airliner.
I mean have you heard V1 rockets in WWII documentaries, it sounded
like a propeller plane it was so noisy rattly not a jet liner. More like the
old pulse rocket.

The Flight numbers never existed, no plane hit PA. So what do you have.
The laser might not even be needed. But to be on the safe side would
involve targeting and someone close by to do it.

So what happens now, there is a TV station and a Airline that are in this
with three missile and wiring and charges, the collapse of the subbasement
and towers and finally WTC 7.

Not bad for a conspiracy. If you knew would you tell.
OK, I'm moving to the next conspiracy.

I think it's just a piece of A4 office paper that had been sucked out of a hole in the North Tower and which happened to be blown by strong winds towards the direction of impact of the plane. Its sudden appearance was due to sunlight being reflected off it at just the right angle to make it visible to the video camera. That's why it does not show in the CNN TV footage taken from a much different angle.

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
There are web pages on TV fakery: on videos of "Flight 175" slipping into the South Tower are falsified.

The sound of pulse rocket is heard as independent film maker gets the
hit on the North Tower. That is analyzed as not an airliner.
I mean have you heard V1 rockets in WWII documentaries, it sounded
like a propeller plane it was so noisy rattly not a jet liner. More like the
old pulse rocket.

The Flight numbers never existed, no plane hit PA. So what do you have.
The laser might not even be needed. But to be on the safe side would
involve targeting and someone close by to do it.

So what happens now, there is a TV station and a Airline that are in this
with three missile and wiring and charges, the collapse of the subbasement
and towers and finally WTC 7.

Not bad for a conspiracy. If you knew would you tell.
OK, I'm moving to the next conspiracy.

Those who think that the TV footage of Flight 175 slipping into the South Tower was faked just don't understand how compressed, poor-resolution images lead to optical illusions. The absence of a dark hole between the fuselage and the left engine, which makes them think the footage was faked, arises from the poor resolution of the TV images taken from far away, which makes fine detail impossible to discern and areas of pixels with slightly different RGB values impossible for the eye to distinguish. So much hot air has been wasted by the no-planers for such poor and badly misunderstood evidence! The reason they do not see an explosion at impact is because it occurred in the shade cast by the South Tower. It's there, but the poor resolution clip makes it appear to vanish. Shots taken by other cameras show the explosion happening as expected precisely at the moment of impact.

To me it does look like a bird. Reasons:

Well... it's hard to tell how far away from the tower it is, but when it flys in front of the building to the right of the tower it seems to me that the bird is actually even closer still than you imagine, ie. it's not brushing it's stomach against the structure like a swallow would do.

Couldn't it just be an albatros or some other large bird?
Also the "blinking" about it resembles what I have seen on other fairly large birds in seaside cities. The light is coming from the back right of the camera man, that means that when the wing of the bird closest to us is in a upward motion sunlight would reflect right at us and when down it would "blink off".
Since this many sidesea birds have light feathers underneath and dark feathers on top it would mean that the wing furthest away from us would not create as much reflection as the wing closest to us... thereby causing "blink".

or... a large piece of paper or such could also do the trick while swirling in the wind. It just seems the path of the object is pretty much pretty determined to me, and that's why I'm with the bird theory

/cheers

[edit on 17/3/07 by flice]

Anything in the South Tower or second hit video is suspect and
considered doctored.

Since the referenced flights were never scheduled or had pasengers
the planes were unmanned, the Arabs were never seen in the airport
security cameras and no boarding list of true origin ever existed.

Only the first hit film is considered true and is argued about as to size
of the pane. Both hits bring out large fireball at entrance and some
flames out a side. The second hit film is backward physics, and impossible
according to some analysts. Great care was taken to show how the
first plane entered as a debunk of the small plane issue but then it
totally makes the second hit look like a fraudulent TV effect.

So thats what this laser thing is all about, the planes must have been
remote controlled and one Air Force Officer on satellite company
stock board once said it may become possible at some time.

Was it on the original and forgot to take it out. Now it turns into a
gigantic piece of paper. The plane isn't even there, off to the right
there is a plane in position to a shoot napalm missile into the side
that explodes with the fire ball.

So in two fights no one died, the PA crash has no plane parts,
the forth referenced flight that day may have been give as incorrect
as well and another crash plane used. This is just from people looking
into flight records and not accepting what TV stations say.

Also from communications people, cell phones from planes don't
work unless relayed by satellite and at that time the news on the stock
boards is it didn't work. This same argument is on 911 conspiracy
sites and from what I understood at the time, its a lie there was a cell
phone communication. And the 911 conspiracy site is correct.

Piece of paper, thats what we see, then it was put there.
I don't even think the plane went that way so the laser wasn't needed.

Most likely what you're seeing is something that is moving in front on the tower.

To me it looks like a bird or something floating / falling at an angle.

Plus, a laser would be very small - or they could simply use an undetectable IR laser.

reply to post by ChemicalLaser


But videocameras DO detect infrared, and it shows up white on the recording (just try pointing you're TV remote at your camcorder and press a button to see it for yourself).

I do believe that it is an infrared laser - but not a targeting laser. Airliners are equipped with Low-Level Windshear Alert Systems (LLWAS), to warn pilots of dangerous downbursts on the glideslope. These systems measure diffraction of a laser beam, most likely in the infrared spectrum. I think it's likely that the system automatically activated due to the low altitude, projecting a laser dot onto the side of the building.

nevermind, delete pls

[edit on 22/5/08 by Obliv_au]

Looking at the video, to me it does not look like a reflection, and it definitely doesn't look like a piece of debris. If you look at all the other footage of the event, all the other debris is being blown around and rotating at inconsistent angles due to the wind. This moves is a uniform direction from right to left, at a constant downward angle, at a consistent speed and keeps a consistent brightness.

reply to post by Jack Tripper


Scale.

Meaning, if that's a laser designator..........that's one GIGANTIC beam. Can you imiagine the size of the device it would take to make a beam that appears to be about 20 feet in diameter (at least)?

Also, why would 'they' need a laser designator? For what purpose? If you were trying to pull off a massive conspiracy, wouldn't it be in your best interest to make the plan as uncomplicated as possible? A laser designator would require an operator(s). One that can project a 20 foot diameter beam probably needs a crew and a large structure to house and operate it.