It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Rare footage shows laser guidance system directing flight 175 into the south tower!

page: 6
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in


posted on Feb, 23 2007 @ 10:54 AM

Originally posted by BigMoser
its not a laser, its a damn floating piece of metal/paper/etc.!! can you people not see that?

NO KIDDING! geeesh... this video has been posted before AND been explained in detail before.

posted on Feb, 23 2007 @ 11:04 AM
Petition to close this thread as it has no bearing on the Pentagon whatsoever!

1) BigMoser

(Keep it in the regular 9/11 forums)

posted on Feb, 23 2007 @ 12:31 PM
We don't close or move threads based on 'petitions', so please just drop that and lets all stay on topic.

posted on Feb, 23 2007 @ 02:49 PM

Originally posted by Nygdan
We don't close or move threads based on 'petitions', so please just drop that and lets all stay on topic.

Since this is my forum can I request that it is deleted?

As stated, after research and analysis I have determined this is not a laser and would prefer for this thread to not be in our forum.

posted on Feb, 23 2007 @ 03:02 PM
As the OP jack what now convinces you its not a laser

posted on Feb, 23 2007 @ 03:06 PM
I'm curious too. Jack, what is the reasoning behind your conclusion?

posted on Feb, 24 2007 @ 01:23 PM

Originally posted by Jack Tripper

Since this is my forum can I request that it is deleted?


This forum belongs to all of us who have contributed, read the creative commons license.

For someone who claims to be a truth seeker you sure seem caught up in hiding it.

posted on Feb, 24 2007 @ 02:39 PM
But Jacks was the best laser, I don't know type of post.

Those others are poor copies, later generations and different angles.

How many camera were on those towers.

Yeah this has happened before on forums, like delete my posts
I'm leaving the forum kind of thing. Posts are sort of the property of
of the forum and up to their discretion.

Hey wait till I talk about UFOs and such, thats the last post on
every conspiracy thread, lol, never to be seen again.

Not that it won't be brought up again, but I'd say paper or such
floating down and not a light on the wall of the building.

So even though digital cameras pick out infa-red did you say,
a bright paper seems to be the way to go here.

The digital camera may the good for picking up the dark
planes in front of trails, if super hot and sparky it might show
up. Some photos or videos have a bright object other have dark
a object.

I have seen posts edited out on band forums, too many links
to bootlegs. Megaupload is now 500MB so if we need to post
favorite captures longer than YouTube we can do it. It lets

posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 04:46 AM
If we can see that spot on the south tower, it most likely is not a laser guidance system. Most laser targeting systems are in the non-visble light spectrum, just thought i might throw that in

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 12:10 PM
Non visible infa red heat seeking laser spots were being picked up
by a digital camera was one suggestion.

We can't be sure if digital video was used or if its true that heat spots
show up as bright spots in digital cameras.

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 12:52 PM
Very interesting footage. First time I have seen it. For the most part, I feel that it is some type of debris from the other tower, however, I find it 'interesting' how the 'dot' appears to begin at the very left edge.

Unfortunately, because the video is not exceptionally clear, we may never know what it was.

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 01:03 PM
i either seen a clip from somewhere that shows that same thing or something thats extremely similiar it wasnt a news broadcast i went too look for it and i found this it appears to be the laser being shown by the smoke from an angle that i havent seen much of anyway

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 01:15 PM
The first video posted stays a spot more or less.

What gets me is that could someone cgi in a paper on
the close up video.

Some one suggested a Giant diaper caused it must have been
no ordinary piece of paper, bed sheet maybe. This is the sort
of comments you get.

I feel I've been covered. And what is this laser spot supposed to mean.
People see extra gas tank on the plane, was it a control pod.
Is the pod cgi and the idea of a tank dumb so we think its a control

You can't win. Is it a cgied illusion of conspiracy.

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 01:28 PM

You got some unexplained lights flashing from somewhere
in a cloud by the remaining buildings.

And some hot lights flying by twice, it could be those helicopters
with hot lights on them, the first and brightest as it heads toward the

I'm not an expert on these type of lights, I only claim UFO lights might
be Tesla related light effects. This is a new conspiracy for me and
perhaps more difficult.

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 01:33 PM

Originally posted by justanothergangster
i found this it appears to be the laser being shown by the smoke from an angle that i havent seen much of anyway

Nice find. OK this clip has really got my attention now when taken in context together with the OP clip. It is apparently more of a searchlight type source rather than 'lasers'. What was generating these searchlights? And when you can answer that, I'd next ask, how was it that one could so accurately track the second plane hit (as per the OP clip).

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 01:55 PM
this may take a while but im trying to find a picture of the plane when it hits you can see a light on the building that "tracks" i geuss you could say the movement of the plane to the point of impact but maybe if somone here knows more than me about the subjest how hard would it be to project an image on to something thats movingi know it sounds like a long shot but when i saw the video im looking for it looks more like the light was projecting on to the plane and overshooting on to the building

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 02:12 PM
This is too weird.

You have controlled flight perhaps and targeting.
You have sequenced demolition after tilting of top levels
You have some sort of raging pentagon conspiracy.
You have one plane shot down, or not which make you think
the conspiracy ran out of targets.

Any more for icing on this cake.

So far we have lights on a building and helicopter on first video and
now racing around in the clouds on this last clip.

If all the guidance was over why didn't they turn off the lasers, oops.

It was a bright day but would using regular spotlights show up in the
clouds. They might.

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 02:31 PM
wouldnt you be able to see the chopper? take this video for what its worth but it discusses anomalies in the first hit after like 20 seconds of video problems or sumthin thats another look right at the second hit i can see no helicopter however at where this camera is the cbs camera would be just behind it i what else could it have been? some people also reported seeing a small private jet hit the pentagon....

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 06:50 PM
So that did in the Pentagon, the little plane theory.
I so wanted to post at Wiki...

There are links to web pages saying the hijackers turned up alive,
and the flights never existed.


The new data base. After researcher found no flight record.
Don't know if he keep the old data base records.

Is that why we got this remote control or missile controversy?

With the rest a sophisticated demolition job?

posted on Mar, 12 2007 @ 08:51 PM
Personally, I'm goin with the debris explanation. I can't even remotely come up up with anything close to a laser on this one. Nope. Methinks some people are seeing what they might want to see so they can hang on to the conspiracy theories. (Maybe Prez. Bush was holding the laser to make the plane go where Cheney told him to make it go!)

Spelling, my bad

[edit on 3/12/2007 by bjshobbes]

top topics

<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in