It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aris
Sure. If that were the case, I would agree. Seeing as how the events on the ground are nothing like the propaganda you are parroting, this comparison of yours is laughable.
They are well documented. Even British commanders have highly criticized American tactics, stating that "the Americans think they're cowboys in the Wild West" and also that "the Americans consider Iraqis untermunschen", for eg.
No and I have no idea what you are yammering on about.
That statement, standing on its own, clearly displays the simplistic way you seem to understand things.
What you actually mean is that "sometimes you need to work with scum so you can pillage a sovereign nation's resources".
Every country? Really? And by the way, it's called "predatory neoliberal capitalism".
Nope. Well documented facts that are in the public domain. You really should step outside your bubble, it would seem.
As you mentioned yourself, the Balkans were recently subjected to western imperialism.
Other than that, why bother doing much in Europe in the last decade when US military bases are already installed almost everywhere and they're still there?
Well we could start with Bill Clinton himself who admitted to his country helping set up and financing the Greek dictatorship, providing intelligence for it etc etc.
A fact he formally apologized for, when he officially visited Greece while still President of the US of A.
I was referring to Britain's involvement, during the 20th century in places like the Middle East for eg.
Please do.
0.1 of what?
That hundreds of thousands of them are dead, at the hands of the coalition of the dwindling?
That the US systematically tortures them? Collective punishment? Destruction of their country?
You seem to have this fixation that the US Air Force only has B-52s.
Wrongo, Jacko. The Brits in Iraq, for eg, hardly use overwhelming tactics against the local population.
I'm defending nothing. We're debating various points and if you haven't noticed, I'm asking you questions as well. I make points with sources, you just toss out simplistic views without the ability to expand on them, never mind sources.
Wow! The source is two whole months old! I never knew the Iraq War started a couple of months ago!
Originally posted by Aris
Let me tell you something:
Yep. The US is using a "scalpel" in Iraq bwahahahahahaha
Accurate air power? LOL! That statement alone shows how clued out you are. Would you care to provide sources that support this statement of yours?
Circular error probable 9 meters
A rebel that only has a AK-47, fighting against a US soldier who has night vision goggles, body armour, supporting Apache helicopters above him, Predator drones giving him aerial views, overwhelming firepower etc etc, isn't brave?
LOL! Not to belittle ATSNN, but that's not exactly what people mean when they say "diversify the sources of your news".
LOL again. "Pot calling kettle". Gimme a break.
You, on the other hand, seem to only read CNN and ATSNN. "Pot calling kettle" indeed....
Bring what up? That the US has used, at times, B-52s? Maybe because they have?
Like I said before, you seem to have this fixation on B-52s. Either that or you're attempting a straw man argument....
Nope. I'm in Greece, as my avatar clearly states.
The coalition does not bomb cities that do not harm them.
Yep, another straw man argument.
Can I ask you a question? I'm not asking so as to put you down;
I'm asking because I am really wondering....How old are you?
FBI details possible Guantanamo Bay abuse
Some military officials and contractors told FBI agents that the interrogation techniques had been approved by the Defense Department, including directly by former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
Personally very upsetting
The agency asked 493 employees whether they witnessed aggressive treatment that was not consistent with the FBI’s policies. The bureau received 26 positive responses, including some from agents who were troubled by what they saw.
“I did observe treatment that was not only aggressive but personally very upsetting,” one agent wrote, describing seeing a man left in a 100-degree room with no ventilation overnight. “The detainee was almost unconscious on the floor with a pile of hair next to him. He had apparently literally been pulling his own hair out throughout the night.”
Contractors Are Cited in Abuses at Guantanamo
New allegations of detainee abuse at Guantanamo Bay released by the FBI on Tuesday put private contractors at the center of interrogation operations, raising questions once again about where they fit in the military's chain of command.
The FBI's disclosures, which are based on eyewitness reports, refer several times to contractors directing the Army's interrogation efforts at the military detention center in Cuba. In at least one case, FBI agents were told that detainees may have been mistreated on orders from a contractor.
Meet the New Interrogators: Lockheed Martin
Dozens of people converged this summer in the high desert town of El Paso, Texas, en route to spending six months in Iraqi prisons. They were going not as prisoners, but as their interrogators, walking a legalistic tightrope stretched across the Geneva Conventions. Just for signing up, they got a $2,000 check from a company that is rapidly becoming one of the key employers in the world of intelligence: Lockheed Martin, the world's biggest military company, based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Michaelis, who is the main point of contact for new interrogators, came to Lockheed in February after it acquired his former employer Sytex in a $462 million takeover. Sytex was founded 1988 by Sydney Martin, a management graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who dabbles in collecting old Danish and Irish coins. In its first year, the Pennsylvania-based company earned $1,500. By 2004, according to Congressional Quarterly, Sytex was providing "personnel and technology solutions to government customers including the Pentagon's Northern Command, the Army's Intelligence and Security Command, and the Department of Homeland Security." Its revenues had reached $425 million..
The company's reach and influence go far beyond the military. A New York Times profile of the company in 2004 opened with the sentence: "Lockheed Martin doesn't run the United States. But it does help run a breathtakingly big part of it."
"Over the last decade, Lockheed, the nation's largest military contractor, has built a formidable information-technology empire that now stretches from the Pentagon to the Post Office. It sorts your mail and totals your taxes. It cuts Social Security checks and counts the United States census. It runs space flights and monitors air traffic. To make all that happen, Lockheed writes more computer code than Microsoft" writes Tim Weiner.
But Susan Burke, a lawyer for Iraqi prisoners who say they were tortured at Abu Ghraib, challenges the legality of using private contractors for interrogation. "Interrogation has always been considered an inherently governmental function for obvious reasons. It is irresponsible and dangerous to use contractors in such settings given that there is a long history of repeated human rights abuses by contractors." The Philadephia attorney charges that the use of private contractors is illegal. "The United States Congress has passed laws (the Federal Acquisition Regulations) that prevent the executive branch from delegating "inherently governmental functions" to private parties."
You have voted yanchek for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by IAF101
Same old BS! Nobody is impressed!
Pfft! I wonder how many people have tried to make their points here about who is torturing whom. If "torturing" people is saving lives, then nobody is complaining!
Spare us this crap that has been going on and on for the better part of this decade!
Originally posted by IAF101
Same old BS! Nobody is impressed!
Pfft! I wonder how many people have tried to make their points here about who is torturing whom. If "torturing" people is saving lives, then nobody is complaining!
Spare us this crap that has been going on and on for the better part of this decade!
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
US tortures this guy, UN rapes this kid, France hearts Iraq, some kid blows himself up in a schoolyard to prove what? I dont know. I dont think he even knows.
Same bull different day.