Type 45 Destroyer capabilities, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 26-2-2006 @ 01:58 AM by stumason
Winchester, whilst I agree with you that the MoD has a track record of cutting corners, this is due to the Treaury rather than anything they themselves are doing. Given free reign without the Treasury breathing down their necks, they would be much better at procurement.


But that VLS really needs to hold more than just SAMs, modern warships that claim to be world class need to be able to project power in a variety of different ways as opposed to the prior approach of building "specialized" (read - "compromised") ships.


Specialised doesn't mean compromised.

The Type-45 is a destroyer. The primary mission for a Destroyer is fleet air defence. It isnt supposed to do land attack or ASW operations, that falls to the Frigates, Fleet Submarines (with the new Astute class subs coming online which have been designed to carry a large payload of cruise missiles) and eventually, the two new Aircraft Carriers.

If you tried to design a warship that could do everything, you would be looking at a seriously high bill from BAe!

Further more, this comes back to the Treasury problem. They would never allow the MoD to order a batch of all round super-ships, the price is too high. They would also probably cut the Aircraft Carrier programme, which the Navy is pinning it's hopes on.

The fleet is undergoing a major change at the moment, so in 2012-15, it will be a modern, cohesive fighting force with some very advanced and capable weapons platforms. Up to that point, whilst it is still a very effective force now, it will look disjointed until all the new platforms come through.


reply posted on 27-2-2006 @ 06:06 AM by paperplane_uk
Originally posted by st3ve_o
ps:- can someone tell me about another british project 'sea wraith' ive been reading about when ive typed in 'type45 destroyer'

foxxaero.homestead.com...

it says its a stealth ship that will be capable of artificially generating a mist to disquise itself as a bank of fog - sounds amazing


[edit on 24-2-2006 by st3ve_o]


Sea wraith was an unsolicted design option for a future surface combatant developed by Vosper Thornycroft in the late 90's. It was never taken past the concept stage. The mist stealth system however was developed (originally it began life as the spraydown system in the NBC suite, but has been hevily modified). This is a working system and HAS been fitted to the type 45's (part of the reason vospers still got some buildwork on the 45's, despite them being wholely designed by BaE).

The guys comparing the Kidds and the 45's be careful to compare like with like. Mission profiles for frigates and destroyrs in the US and UK navies are veryy different. In the US a destroyer is an all purpose killing machine able to take on air/land/sea/sub threats. In the RN however a destoyers role is purely AAW for the fleet. It only has a very basic fit in the other roles (e.g minor air defence, basic sonar outfit ). Sub hunting and strike roles are left to the subs and frigates.

Saying that, the long term plans for the 45's include CIWS as a priority (most likely the systems off the 42's as the decommision), they are designed to have a land attack capability fitted at a later servicing (if the government/mod ever decide which system they want). They could also have torpedo's fitted if required.

This whole argument about which is the most powerful ship afloat (US Nimitz Class or SSBN btw) stems for a statement dreamed up by some marketing jock at BaE and siesed upon by the UK press. The navy has certainly never said anything more than it will be most powerful destoyer they have ever fielded.

In the long term she may well become the powerful all purpose warship we longfore but she isnt there yet.


reply posted on 27-2-2006 @ 01:41 PM by Winchester Ranger T
Originally posted by stumason
Specialised doesn't mean compromised.


Based on the experiences of the Falklands I believe it means exactly that. We had a specialised ASW force that was totally unprepared to fight an air war and shore bombardment mission - some frigates didn't even have guns.

The Type-45 is a destroyer. The primary mission for a Destroyer is fleet air defence. It isnt supposed to do land attack or ASW operations


Well it has a bow sonar, ASW torpedoes and I believe 2 ASW helicopters so I question your assertion that it isn't supposed to do ASW operations. However, I very much doubt that the attack subs will carry "large payloads" of cruise missiles, they are somewhat too large to be carried in any number in the torpedo racks, and then you also sacrifice your torpedo load out (compromise, compromise). You need a VLS system - which is what the Americans realised, which is why their subs no longer carry Tomahawks internally, they don't compromise.

If you tried to design a warship that could do everything, you would be looking at a seriously high bill from BAe!


Or you could just order an Arleigh Burke (but preferably with ASTER not Standard).

Further more, this comes back to the Treasury problem. They would never allow the MoD to order a batch of all round super-ships, the price is too high. They would also probably cut the Aircraft Carrier programme, which the Navy is pinning it's hopes on.


Which is what I'm saying - they cut corners, expect it with the Type 45.

The fleet is undergoing a major change at the moment, so in 2012-15, it will be a modern, cohesive fighting force with some very advanced and capable weapons platforms. Up to that point, whilst it is still a very effective force now, it will look disjointed until all the new platforms come through.


We'll see.


reply posted on 27-2-2006 @ 11:11 PM by stumason

Based on the experiences of the Falklands I believe it means exactly that. We had a specialised ASW force that was totally unprepared to fight an air war and shore bombardment mission - some frigates didn't even have guns.


It was short sighted, but that was the primary role of the fleet, ASW. That was were the main threat was perceived from the USSR. We just dont have the money to maintain a huge fleet capable of all and sundry. Also, we expected to fight any war alongside the US, which would fulfil the main fighting role whilst we would take care of the submarine threat and protection of the GIUK gap.


Well it has a bow sonar, ASW torpedoes and I believe 2 ASW helicopters so I question your assertion that it isn't supposed to do ASW operations.


Question away Winchester, but here are some sources to back up my "claims":



The main mission of the Type 45 anti-air warfare destroyer is to provide local area fleet defence, with long range radar and wide area defence capability. The ship's combat systems also have the capability to control aircraft and co-ordinate the anti-air warfare operations of the task force. The Type 45 is equipped with long range weapon systems to intercept air threats including super-agile manoeuvring missiles with re-attack modes. The UK PAAMS will defend the ships from missiles approaching individually or in salvos and is capable of controlling a large number of airborne missiles simultaneously. The Type 45 could also accommodate cruise missiles such as the Tomahawk and anti-ballistic missiles if a requirement was identified in future. The Type 45 will be able to operate a helicopter up to the size of a Royal Navy's Merlin helicopter, but will initally operate with Lynx HMA.8 helicopters armed with Stingray torpedoes.

Source




Air Defence Destroyer (Type 45)

The Type 45 class will be the largest and most powerful air defence destroyers ever operated by the Royal Navy and the largest general purpose surface warships (excluding aircraft carriers and amphibious ships) to join the fleet since World War Two cruisers. The projected deep load displacement of the Type 45, at around 7,200 tonnes, will also exceed that of any other general purpose surface combatant, again excluding aircraft carriers and amphibious ships, built for the Royal Navy since the Tiger class cruisers of the 1941 programme.

When the Type 45 enters service later this decade it will provide the fleet with an air defence capability that is several orders of magnitude greater than that provided by the existing force of Type 42 destroyers.

The main armament of the class will be the sophisticated and lethal Principal Anti Air Missile System (PAAMS), which is being developed and procured jointly with France and Italy. PAAMS will equip the Type 45 to defend itself and other ships in company from attack by existing and future anti-ship missiles of all types. The Type 45 will also be able to operate close inshore and use PAAMS to give air cover to British Forces engaged in the land battle. The system is designed to defend against supersonic, stealthy, highly manoeuvrable missiles that could use sea-skimming or steep-diving flight profiles approaching in salvoes, simultaneously from several directions.

Source



However, I very much doubt that the attack subs will carry "large payloads" of cruise missiles, they are somewhat too large to be carried in any number in the torpedo racks,


Try reading up on the Astute then. They carry a weapons loadout over twice that of the Trafalgar Class currently in service. Up to 32 missiles and Torpedoes in fact. Not bad for a submarine.

Seeing as the new Virginia class carries 16 Tomahwaks and 26 Torpedoes, its not that shabby seeing as the Virginia has the VLS. Also, the Virgina only has 4 tubes were as the Astute has 6.


Or you could just order an Arleigh Burke (but preferably with ASTER not Standard).


Why? We know you love all things American, Winchester and the Arleigh Burkes are great ships, but the Type 45 does the job we want it to do and is made in the UK.



I just don't like the notion that each ship is interdependent on each other to provide defenses in specialized areas, IMO it makes you more vulnerable and it limits your operations outside a group.


Westy, the Type 45 is capable of multi-role and can operate independantly, but it's primary function is Fleet Air defence. But, stick it on it's own and it can perform ASW operations if needed. It is however, not likely to be on it's own in a combat arena, as said it's primary function is to defend the Fleet (read Carriers) from incoming Air threats
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Top 10 Non-Lethal Weapons
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
A Different look at the Tunguska Event
  Posted 2 days ago with 7 member flags
The Robots Of Boston Dynamics Inc.
  Posted 5 days ago with 4 member flags
Camouflage face paint \'resists intense heat from bombs\'
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Freeze Dried Food
  Posted 1 days ago with 1 member flags
Asia’s New Arms Race: Missiles, Missile Defenses
  Posted 15 days ago with 0 member flags