Mass. Wal-Mart Must Stock Contraception

With all the yelling and screaming about Muslims seeking to take away our 1st amendment rights, we have our own taking away our liberties...

I understand that people want access to this drug, but forcing a private business to carry the product is absurd! Is this China???

Where is everyone's anger on that?

I disagree with you on this one, if the state laws required all pharmaceuticals to carry the drugs then Wal-Mart is not any different they have to applied like any other business for licenses to dispense drugs so they have to abide by the law, be private or not.

Or they can lose their license.

Plain and simple.

[edit on 14-2-2006 by marg6043]

I'm not getting your disagreement to this. I have a 16 year old son a 13(and 11) year old girl(s). You're pushing for MORE teenage pregnancy?

Don't get it dude.

If there were a law, I might agree with you...but I read:



Is a "policy" a law? Perhaps in this case it was, in which case I might moderate my tone a bit... But I am not at all comfortable with the concept of government telling a business they have to sell a certain product. That kind of power cuts both ways...

Read my post above... And of course not.... I might point out that the drug was freely available at other retailers...

You want the government forcing YOU to sell something?


[edit on 14-2-2006 by loam]

I have a 22 daughter and a 19 year old son and pregnancy and promiscuity has never been an issue in my home.

What you teach you children is what you children carry with them regardless of what is going on in the world.

Let me put it another way for you:
Depression medication is also one of those "optional" sorts of things just like birth control pills.

How would YOU feel if you were prescribed Prozac and went to your local drug provider only to be told "we object to antidepressants on religious grounds. Go home and pray."

Birth control pills are used for hormone replacement and for a lot of other things. The objection isn't based on what the meds do. It's based on how someone feels about a med or what their religion dictates they should feel about it.

So what if the pharmacist is a Christian Scientist? They could refuse on religious grounds to dispense things such as blood pressure meds.

As Intrepid said, "Don't get it, dude."

Read your post man, if the LEADING retailer, where everyone goes to for nappies and batteries............ If you're going to nationalize things, expect the nation to come in and demand what they need.

Dude, have you ever REALLY looked around in Walmart?



Walmart is already Sin City- seems like the new addition fits right in!

That is how it is supposed to work. This isn't about the government restricting the product you sell... It's about the government FORCING you to sell a particular product.

Why not force grocery stores to sell specific food items in the interest of public health? Or restaurants for that matter?

I'm NOT against contraception.... I'm against the state forcing my business to sell a product.

Contraception is not medication. Pregnancy is not a disease or illness.

No one should have to be required to stock anything.

There was another thread about this, before this decision was made, I argued your exact points but of course I got the same old line of women are being denied their medication and....etc. I disagree strongly with the notion that I can sue a private company because they don't sell what I want.

Simply absurd, isn't it?

Under Threat of Lawsuit



FYI, We cannot get this pill in our town because pharmacies don't want to sell it. We cannot go down the street because they don't want to sell it either. We have to drive 2 hours to fill a Rx for this pill.

What if they decided they didn't want to hand out anti-depressants? Or the drug I take to control seizures? What if everyone in town didn't want to carry it?

Pharmacies must meet certain state regulations. It's not like it's a little Mom and Pop's and they're refusing to sell the bread I like. There are certain responsibilities pharmacies have to meet. They are regulated by the state.

[edit on 14-2-2006 by Benevolent Heretic]

What many here that claim Big giant wal-mart is a Private company seems to oversee is that being a Private company and one that is becoming one of the biggest monopolies in the US when it comes to built in small towns and suck up all smaller businesses around is that they are left with the responsibility to supply the town and surrounding areas with the same goods that they are driving away from other stores that they are absorbing.

That includes other pharmacies in the area.

Wal-Mart can pretty much dictate what people in small towns buy, consume and used.

So what do you call that?

I call it Corporate dictatorship

Have you seen some of the people who shop at Wal-Mart? Would contraception really be a bad thing? I just hope the religious right doesn't go after Rogaine next! Emergency contraception pills are just like condoms or IUD. It just prevents the sperm and egg from making goo. I hope condoms aren't next on the list. I'm a single man, I need my condoms!

Don't worry Curme the fight is not against the male population is about the female side of the population and their right to make decisions about their fertility and birth rights.

You will always find your Viagra, Rogain and occurs your condoms in any size and style

They are after women not men.

I think it's more of a "You must carry this"
I don't agree.
It's a free market and I control my company, if it doesn't sell, it doesn't sell.
CVS carries them.
I would think if you were planning on getting it on, you'd atleast know where to go for a morning after pill or a condom.

Some stores sell beer and wine, but not hard booze. If I'm in the mood and hit up one that doesn't have it....I go to another store.

-DT

Edit to correct the condom/protection line


[edit on 14-2-2006 by Derek Trance]

[edit on 14-2-2006 by Derek Trance]

It's a pharmaceutical. A drug.



Even if the state law requires it? I thought you supported state's laws. Must have been someone else.

Pharmacies are regulated by the states. There's a Board of Pharmacy in every state that says how they have to operate. Apparently Mass. board of Pharmacy has a policy that the pharmacies must serve the people with the pharmaceutical they normally require and this pill has been included in that.

I understand the difficultly that presents, but let's call this type of government compulsion what it truly is.... indentured servitude to the state.

If you acknowledge this example now, what distinctions will you make when the government forces businesses to deliver other products and services?

For example, maybe...just maybe...abortion clinics will have to provide counseling services from a provider of the government's choice... (Remember the specially recognized "charities" listed by the White House???? ) ...one that has a 30 day seminar covering topics such as abstinence, intelligent design, or any other mumbo jumbo the government believes is in the public interest...

The truth is life can suck... There are many problems government can't fix. Letting them try "just a little bit" can be an invitation for a whole lot more.

There's another problem too. What happens when under this logic EVERYONE with some obscure drug requirement forces pharmacies to carry their particular drug? Over time, people will just stop opening pharmacies....



Yes, they regulate behavior... but they shouldn't be allowed to compel it in this manner, in my view.

( That's two issues in a week, BH. )

[edit on 14-2-2006 by loam]