It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Revealing Truth Behind Revelations

page: 2
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 4 2003 @ 11:53 PM
link   
Do not forget that the Second Return of Christ will set up the Millenium Kingdom - a thousand year reign of the earth under Jesus Christ. The world is not destroyed until after the 1000 year reign. As for the universe, the Bible doesn't really say so. Therefore those who reject Christ at the end of the Kingdom do so after His reign. Also many Christians believe that we will not be around to be blamed for the rise of the beast and the End Times war. Indeed the war predicted before the return of Christ will be stopped by Him to prevent the entire destruction of man kind.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:02 AM
link   
Billybob:
Just make sure it is God you are talking to and listening to. Remember there are also millions of demons who would just love to tell you exactly what you want to hear.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:14 AM
link   
Theneo for the record I do not discount your conclusions, in fact there is a legend which sugest that despite the current contention. Dinasours did develop a life form equivalent in knowledge and technology to mankind in the 1950s.

When the event related to mass extinction occurred
these forms of life were able to leave earth. They were alleged able to return to earth about 4 thousand years ago and interacted with Western Hemispheric Indians for a while. Legend indicates that founders intervened with respect to their plans and as a result the conclusion was that this was no longer their planet.

Some sugest this was not the end of the issue but only in respect to the consideration that Western Hemispheric Indians were in fact savages. A point that I have made clear is invalid.


Yes Jagd have heard about the 1000 years of peace but by whose conclusions? A man imprisoned (allegedly from what I have heard) and most like sentenced to death by the Roman Empire. His vision of peace would probably include the thousand years the Vatican was in power.

Any thoughts?



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by jagdflieger
Billybob:
Just make sure it is God you are talking to and listening to. Remember there are also millions of demons who would just love to tell you exactly what you want to hear.


that's what faith is.
i don't hear what i want to, either. yay!
if i just followed desire, i wouldn't be posting here. i would be unhappily beating my servants and unhappily counting and hoarding my money while i performed depraved sex acts in my unhappy bedroom.
as it is, i going to have to say ciao for now and go happily get some in my humble abode.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:16 AM
link   
I'm trying to get clear what you have decided to be so adamantly skeptical about. Is that you have decided that the Revelation was about contemporaneous events and not prophetic events? Or that it wasn't written at the time it is claimed to be? Or that it shouldn't have been included in the New Testament?

Please clarify your objection.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:25 AM
link   
To be honest my impression is Revelations is a book about the past. If it were not, the book of Malachi would have been included in today's version of the bible.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:28 AM
link   
Toltec:
The Book of Revelation is acribed to the Apostle John written when he was exiled to the island of Patmos. The Apostle John was probably the only Apostle to die of natural causes. If you do not want to believe in the Book of Revelation, then feel free to rip it from your Bible. The problem is that there are passages in the Book of Revelation which did not really make sense until the last few years. Indeed there is a portion of Revelation which sounds exactly like an incoming MIRV.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:30 AM
link   
Toltec:
What Book of Malachi are you talking about? It is in my Bible.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:35 AM
link   
how would one attach information in the present to information of the past...
and is the revelations a true book, is the new testament true...
i testify with others on a regular basis are they true...
is the creator true...
is the choice a true one or a false veil...
and do men even comprehend the subjects we frequently converse about on this site...



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:35 AM
link   
I can't resist putting this stuff here, again from the folks at cassiopaea.com:

Q: (L) Why is Appolyon called the "destroyer" in Revelation?
A: Backward for sake of deception. Bible corrupted.
Q: (L) You have often stated that the Bible is corrupted, I
would like to know who, exactly, corrupted the Bible and
when and how they did this?
A: Illuminati brotherhood for a thousand earth years.
Q: (L) Does this mean that up until a thousand years ago the
Bible was fairly accurate?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is there any possibility that the Catholic church had
anything to do with this corrupting influence?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Does the Catholic church have in its possession actual
original texts of the Bible that have not been corrupted?
A: No.
Q: (L) Were there ever such texts in existence?
A: No.
Q: (L) Who wrote the book of Matthew?
A: Greek enforcers.
Q: (L) What are Greek enforcers?
A: Like your FBI.
Q: (L) Who wrote the book of Mark?
A: Same.
Q: (L) Luke and John?
A: Same?
Q: (L) Acts?
A: Same?
Q: (L) Are any books of the New Testament written by who
they claim to be written by?
A: No. Remember this is 70% propaganda.
Q: (L) Is 30% then the truth or the actual teachings?
A: Close. Enough you must decipher from instinct through
meditation.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:43 AM
link   
THENEO
Your post from cassiopaea.com brings to mind a quote:
"In this day and age common sense is at a discount and stupidity is at a premium" - Dasturji Kaikhushru Kuta



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:47 AM
link   
jag,

are we being mouthy again?

now now!



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:50 AM
link   
THENO:

Not You - Them. By the way are these people really serious?



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 12:57 AM
link   
Far as I know yes.

But if you want proof then I don't have much.

Some of it I have verified though.

Consider it theory that needs to be tested.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 01:00 AM
link   
THENEO:

When one of them logs on claiming that their dog is the antichrist, be sure to copy the text and post it here. Who are these people?



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 01:03 AM
link   
jag,

what does their dog have to do with anything?

oh I see you are being funny, ha ha!

if you want to know more about those people go to their website,

they are both academics believe it or not,

a couple, he is a physics professor and she is a psychic.

I have only posted a small amount of their channeling sessions.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 01:08 AM
link   
THENEO:
Well they are definitely not scholars of the Bible or have done much research on how it came about. I am at the web site now - how do I get into the chat room - or do I have to register.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 01:29 AM
link   
You have to register to get into their chat area.

haven't been there in some time.

Yes I have to agree with you that they are not experts on the bible.

But do not underestimate their knowledge because they are fairly rigourous in their studies.

On the other hand I am not aware of your knowledge level, so good luck.



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 01:37 AM
link   
and by the way dont fight the man, fight the body within yourself...



posted on Oct, 5 2003 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by THENEO

A: Close. Enough you must decipher from instinct through
meditation.



this is where i am. and NOT trance type meditation. simple focused contemplation.




top topics



 
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join