It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Oscillator
Yow, TrappedSoul, glad to see you back!
"Still no one explains why the same dark circle in the centre of a lighter circle is present on the light refracting on the camera lens. Making it look remarkably like the out of focus spheres."
If you would look at the pics, that answers it all. I give you proof, and you want arguments? man you are weird. But an argument could be: considering higher frequency on the spectrum, special camera making it visible, middle could be too high a frequency to be seen by that camera. There you go?
Can you explain to me why none of the REAL airy disks do NOT have notches in the side?
Originally posted by Oscillator
lost_shaman, stop linking www.projectprove.com... . This website is clearly part of a cover-up, as I and others already pointed out in this thread. They even dare put copyright on degraded public material, it's just too obvious.
Originally posted by Mcphisto
And these two objects suddenly flying away when they say wakeshield over the radio
When I look closely at this video I notice that some 'objects' move fast away, others move slowly, and if you look very closely others move a tiny bit whilst the rest stay still.
I think that some kind of thruster is in use and 'objects' close seem to move away fast, 'objects' not so close seem to move a bit slower etc, whilst those so far away will not move at all, when the thruster is applied.
Like looking at a passing aircraft, even though its going 500+ mph it looks as if its going nowhere.
But this is only my theory of course.
[edit on 8-3-2006 by Mcphisto]
Originally posted by OscillatorAbout the argument that these things are just pieces of space junk (coincidentally all of them looking the same, pulsating, a few miles wide and not showing up on normal sub UV-cams) that starts moving (and changing direction) because of thrusters getting satellites positioned or something I say: that does NOT make objects shoot from earth and leaving orbit. I'll back this up again:
I don't remember if there where any more arguments against these being UFO's, but please post if you still have any. I want to be proven wrong, it's just that the arguments so far, are really ridiculous.
Originally posted by Wig
They are IMO a few millimeters wide in close proximity with the shuttle. When you can proove otherwise I'll start to listen. The one object in direct line with the thruster went off quickly, the other objects in screen at least one of those moves off less quickly (really slowly to be precise) but in the same general direction. IMO this is space ice/dust moving away from the shuttle.
Originally posted by Oscillator
lost_shaman,
Alright, I gave that website another shot, but what they write here is just disinformation: www.projectprove.com...
I'm sorry but I cannot put it any other way, they conveniently leave of the fact that it's filmed with a CCD camera, and then claim that because the object then had to be "MILES" in diameter, so they had to be visible in "broad daylight" from the ground.
Also considering it's not a normal camera, I don't have a clue about aperture arm or how this would work with this CCD cam. I don't know, but would something like that cause the notch to appear in the same position in each disk? . But I will try to find shots of real airy disks in the _same_ footage (sts-75) this time.
I will post one thing though, before the camera zooms in on the Tether, there is one object which seems to travel in front of the tether, followed by some going behind it.
Originally posted by Oscillator
lost_shaman, stop linking www.projectprove.com... . This website is clearly part of a cover-up, as I and others already pointed out in this thread. They even dare put copyright on degraded public material, it's just too obvious.
Originally posted by rick_y_2
Are you saying that all the objects in these movies that we see moving are Alien craft?????
Are you saying theres that much UFO traffic going on in space???
I'm a pure believer in alien life because its ignorant to think we're the only peoples in this enormous universe. But to think that theres so much traffic going on right outside our atmosphere is pretty wild.
Why when they speak on the videos they don't seem concerned with the objects winging across the lens?
I don't know if they are alien, but since nobody can (really!) tell just what they are, it makes them UFO's.
I have the full video called "Smoking Gun", and when you listen carefully to the STS-75 scene you can actually hear people wowing in the background, when a bright pulsing UFO slowly passes.
Also highly recommended is the "Evidence: The Case for NASA UFO's" video by David Sereda, where he tries to give a full analysis of the best scenes in all the footage he got from Martin Stubbs. He does a good job destroying the airy disk excuse.
Yeah and there is a website out there which gives the timeline of the thrusters being fired and he married it up to coincide with the time this video was taken. But I don't need timelines I just believe it's a thruster anyway, it is not conclusive of any other explanation.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
However, unless a thruster is being fired , and this can be determined
I heard they flush the toilet out to space and it becomes ice particles which float alongside the shuttle.
For instance Ice only flakes off the shuttle for a certain period of time after launch and then it sublimates into space.
Originally posted by MusclorLook at the STS-80 Circle Formation. Not only each light literally switches on only when it reaches its position, but the same thing occurs for the bigger central light, which starts shining intensely when it arrives right in the middle of the formation (still perfect btw). How can this be possible ? Anyone with a sense of logic will understand this is not a natural event here.
Originally posted by Wig
Btw my mind is also open to the possibility that this tether line we see could be a scratch on the lens (or whatever) because of the way it moved up and down when he was adjusting the camera. And the real tether is not visible to us on the film.
Originally posted by Wig
Yeah and there is a website out there which gives the timeline of the thrusters being fired and he married it up to coincide with the time this video was taken. But I don't need timelines I just believe it's a thruster anyway, it is not conclusive of any other explanation.
Originally posted by Wig
Regarding your first phenomenon the "circle of lights" They are particles floating away from the shuttle they enter from (relative) darkness into light hence why they all start to light up at a certain distance. IMO anyone with a sense of logic will understand my explanation to be possible and probable. I gave some timings in an earlier post how the two which come from close to the camera both take about 31 seconds to travel into the area of light.