It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
MODERATOR
Originally posted by Nakash
Not my fault if you don't understand a metaphor. YOU started the mudslinging not him.
And all this "Bush destroyed our economy".... hmmmm interesting, but the American ppl is known for the ppl that less saves, or doenst even save AT ALL... ppl that do not save do not have bad economies.... If the economy was that bad, ppl would start to spend less and save more, but in most cases its exactly the opposite... take a look at the past Christmas... the most popular gifts were Digtal cameras, cell-phones, Xboxs (that run from $300 up), hardly gifts of ppl living under a bad economy.
Originally posted by Tasketo
And all this "Bush destroyed our economy".... hmmmm interesting, but the American ppl is known for the ppl that less saves, or doenst even save AT ALL... ppl that do not save do not have bad economies.... If the economy was that bad, ppl would start to spend less and save more, but in most cases its exactly the opposite... take a look at the past Christmas... the most popular gifts were Digtal cameras, cell-phones, Xboxs (that run from $300 up), hardly gifts of ppl living under a bad economy.
You are totally ignorant. First know what you are talking about before you post.
[edit on 13-2-2006 by Tasketo]
After all isnt this why we put Saddam's party into power. Isnt that why his people were poor as hell? Didnt we do the same thing in Iran? Maby thats why they are fighting us? Or atleast, thats 1 reason.
www.zmag.org... Again, Ignore it if you want. But what happend in the past and the Bush Admin's Oil connections, high oil prices during and after the war in Iraq, & our beef with Chavez are no coincidence.
All I can say is UBL wanted us to stop messing around in the Middle East, indeed we were messing around in the middle east. Setting up illegit regimes that would benefit our oil industry and oppress their people.
Bin laden offered us peace under fair conditions, and Bush Admin laughed at him. Bush isnt protecting our borders, but he is quick to take away our freedoms in the name of defense.
Originally posted by Aelita
The originator of this thread made an amazingly immature statement that somehow sucked a lot of people into discussing this non-topic.
Originally posted by Aelita
For one thing, it's is supremely naive to think that this is some kind of Good vs Evil struggle. Anybody who thinks that should be sent back to grade school.
Originally posted by Aelita
If an Islamic faction decided to punish the US for its intereference in the Middle East, it's just that. I wish the US prevails no matter what, but it's an affront to expect me believe that some kind of biblical Good vs Evil battle. It's not.
Originally posted by Aelita
Then, what exactly Bush was right about? As we all know, there were no proven links between Al Qaeda and Saddam,
During the summer of 2000 — as the Los Angeles Times detailed on January 20, 2002 — at least $99,455 flowed from financial institutions in the United Arab Emirates into a Florida SunTrust account Atta shared with his roommate and fellow hijacker, Marwan Al-Shehhi. That August, they began flight lessons at Venice, Florida's Huffman Aviation.
On April 4, 2001, the FBI says, Atta departed Virginia Beach's Diplomat Inn with Al-Shehhi and cashed a SunTrust check for $8,000. No American eyewitness saw Atta again until April 11.
Atta next was observed April 8 by an informant of BIS, the Czech Secret Service, who reported that Al-Ani met an Arabic-speaking man in a discreetly located restaurant on Prague's outskirts. Atta is believed to have returned to America the following day.
While skeptics dismiss this encounter, Czech intelligence found Al-Ani's appointment calendar in Iraq's Prague embassy, presumably after Saddam Hussein's defeat. Al-Ani's diary lists an April 8, 2001, meeting with "Hamburg student." Maybe, in a massive coincidence, Al-Ani dined with a young scholar and traversed the nuances of Nietzsche. Or perhaps Al-Ani saw Mohamed Atta and discussed more practical matters.
For his part, Al-Ani was jettisoned from Prague on April 22, 2001 for allegedly plotting to blow up Radio Free Europe's headquarters there, also home to Radio Free Iraq. (Al-Ani's predecessor, Jabir Salim, defected to England in December 1998. He said Baghdad gave him $150,000 to arrange the car bombing of RFE, but he could recruit no one to complete the mission.) American forces arrested Al-Ani last July 2 in Iraq. Not surprisingly, he denies meeting Atta.
Originally posted by Aelita
and the WMD program was virtually non-existent, much less capable of producing a wepon that can be deployed "in 40 minutes". I personally hate being lied to, so I can't understand the originator of this thread who apparently loves this stuff.
Originally posted by Aelita
To the poster who said the Islamic is planing the establishment of a Caliphate - yeah right. I know there is a hardcore faction in islam that wants it, but it's no more meaningful than a bunch of evangelistical crusaders here in the US who wants to spread the word of God everywhere on Earth.
[edit on 13-2-2006 by Aelita]
Originally posted by Muaddib
I wish it was only an "Islamic faction" but it is more than that. In south Africa alone millions of people have been systematically murdered by Arab militias backed by Islamic governments. Half of the conflicts in the world have Muslim extremists fighting in them. Are the Muslims extremists really just fighting against injustices caused by the west? or are they trying to continue what their prophet Mohammed started in the middle ages? I am pretty sure it is the latter.
fifth, again, I will say that you do not have to agree with him, but admit that he is cight with the war on terror, and the 11 failed attacks are proof.
Originally posted by esdad71
First, Bin Laden never offered a truce.
WASHINGTON – Rejecting a suggestion by Osama bin Laden of a negotiated truce in the war on terror, Vice President Dick Cheney said there was only one way to deal with terrorists. "I think you have to destroy them," Cheney said.
Originally posted by esdad71
Second, your only basis for stating you don't like the administration is because of his oil riches. Jealousy is so, i don't know, third grade?
Originally posted by esdad71
Third, please read a little of the history of Iran, and realize your statements are bunk. Are you old enough to remember the hostages?
fourth, we never supported Saddam, we reestablished diplomatic relations in the 80's and where the classic Rumsfeld photo comes from shaking hands with the enemy.
Originally posted by esdad71
fifth, again, I will say that you do not have to agree with him, but admit that he is right with the war on terror, and the 11 failed attacks are proof. We need DHS, just as we need UCAV's guarding our borders and citites, but the ACLU would never allow such a thing. So what plan do you have now for the borders?
Spend more money on troops for posts ripping apart the 3 trillion dollar budget, but what else is there to do? Would the administration dare raise taxes to hear complaints?
Answer some of those questions, as yours were answered Tasketo
Originally posted by esdad71
1. No conflict of interest
Originally posted by esdad71
2. Saddam came to power in 1979, and had those who opposed him killed.I know the history since the 50's.
Originally posted by esdad71
Mercedes and VW's. Now there is a conflict of interest .
Originally posted by Harvestfreak
People will always hate those who have freedoms, its that simple. This is no longer about religion its about the fight between freedom and oppression. People think the the US is taking away our freedom, they are not. They are just changing and making new rules. You have the power in this country to say anything you like about the president, the government, heck even your neighbor. If it was like all of you claim it to be, you would not be able to do that, if you did you would be arrested or killed.
The people that make a big deal out of the US taking away our freedom, name some freedoms that have been taking away from us in the past 50 years.
The M.E. is a touchy subject, because so much hardship has fallen on them, people like to blame stuff on others. Its not the US's fault that most of the M.E. is in poverty, its the governmets problem. Sure we tried to liberate the people and help em out. If it weren't for the US the M.E. would still be a savage part under oppression, where anything you said or done, that was against the law of the government you would be killed.
So you can say all you want about the US being evil, the fact is that no matter what we do people will still hate us. Because we are what freedom is all about.