What you said about the track not looking like the original thing is true, but this “track” is also fresh and not susceptible to weathering changes. For example a track before it becomes a fossil has to be covered and protected in order to become that way. If a track has been damaged at all by weathering effects then the fossil imprint is also affected. And if you look at the authentic track it has been distorted and is not a clean cut fresh track. The size is a difference but that could be explained by it being a baby. And we have to keep in mind that (if this animal does exist) that it’s been around for millions of years and is susceptible to evolution. Maybe making it smaller and changing the foot patterns. Plus why would a native go trough all the trouble of creating a false foot and walk around imprinting it in the ground. Just to point out it may look like there’s only three digits in the new image but if you look close enough right before the dirt lightings up in color there’s another digit imprint it’s hard to see unless you look close. And I’m not trying to prove this creature simply trying to find the truth.