The WMD Cult

page: 13
0
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 15 2004 @ 12:50 AM
link   
In such, I also wholeheartedly recommend that some members need to learn how to interpret what said 2002 report mentioned regarding the reasons why there was the possibility of a low probability of WMD present within the invasion target, which was also kindly posted by SkepticOverlord, in the link that you so kindly provided.
The wording is self-evident as is also the "why"....no ambigious leaps to obfuscate were necessary. Simple reading of the wording is all that is and was required. Moral character is likewise given and based on personal perspectives.

BTW, read what Mr. Blix has said of late...as of two days ago? In such........perhaps that too can further fall under obfuscation?

"Former U.N. Iraq chief arms inspector Dr. Hans Blix.....from his home in Stockholm, Sweden, that he still stands by his claim that Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein may in fact have had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) shortly before Operation Iraqi Freedom."
www.newsmax.com...


As such, care to elaborate or speculate on where those UN and UNSCOM documented, unaccounted for anthrax and other WMD, that Saddam/Iraq admitted to having, went or are located? The same documented and unaccounted for WMD information that the UK, France, Russia, Germany, Canada, Spain, the US, and other nations had.......



regards
seekerof

[Edited on 15-2-2004 by Seekerof]




posted on Feb, 15 2004 @ 02:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof

1. why there was the possibility of a low probability of WMD present

2. his claim that Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein may in fact have had weapons of mass destruction (WMD)

3. As such, care to elaborate or speculate on where those UN and UNSCOM documented, unaccounted for anthrax and other WMD, that Saddam/Iraq admitted to having, went or are located? The same documented and unaccounted for WMD information that the UK, France, Russia, Germany, Canada, Spain, the US, and other nations had.......



Aha! The cultists start to make a welcome return.


1. & 2. are obfuscations in their own right. What the hell is a "possibility of a low probability"? What does it mean to "claim he may in fact have had" something?

3. No, I don't care to. I am very settled in the knowledge that WMDs were not where they were specifically "known" to be by the Bush admin liars, and that there were never any readily deployable WMDs posing an imminent threat to the people of the United States of America. Those gross lies are enough for me, but if you need to obfuscate and defend a lack of reason, continue... that's what cults are about.





posted on Feb, 15 2004 @ 10:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar

1. & 2. are obfuscations in their own right. What the hell is a "possibility of a low probability"? What does it mean to "claim he may in fact have had" something?

3. No, I don't care to. I am very settled in the knowledge that WMDs were not where they were specifically "known" to be by the Bush admin liars, and that there were never any readily deployable WMDs posing an imminent threat to the people of the United States of America. Those gross lies are enough for me, but if you need to obfuscate and defend a lack of reason, continue... that's what cults are about.




there is a possibility that the low probability of the possibility of probable WMD was possibly more probable than possible in light of the lack of any non-verifiable lack of evidence that probably, or at least possibly went missing due to unknown probable causes.
what more 'proof' do you need!?



posted on Feb, 15 2004 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by billybob
there is a possibility that the low probability of the possibility of probable WMD was possibly more probable than possible in light of the lack of any non-verifiable lack of evidence that probably, or at least possibly went missing due to unknown probable causes.
what more 'proof' do you need!?



Maybe, perhaps, yes. (Kraftwerk, Sex Object)

Possibly Maybe. (Bjork)



posted on Feb, 15 2004 @ 02:17 PM
link   
I have to keep asking who cares? Saddam is gone, gas is still available to the middle class to fill their SUV's. The Israeli's feel safer, all those oil companies will make more money, all kinds of people got jobs, and we kicked some butts too!

Everyone wins but there is always the same old loveable losers, the infamous taxpayer and the serf used to serve the cult like religions of the world.

We need the order for now because we have a hell of a lot bigger problems coming in future which I would be quite happy to detail for you if you would like to ask me about them. Otherwise this is a dead horse that kicking him ain't gonna lead to any grunts or headnods or any activity whatsoever.

Also, the demoncracks want their government jobs back and their cries of 'moral indignation' are tiring especially when one considers that they are the primary assault on morality in the first place. If war is immoral then you think the Demoncracks would love it! But, oh I forgot they love the body too much, only the body is for sacrificies...

[Edited on 16-2-2004 by Kano]



posted on Feb, 15 2004 @ 02:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by THENEO
and we kicked some raghead butts too!


were there canadian troops attackin iraq too?



posted on Feb, 15 2004 @ 02:26 PM
link   
There were Canadians in Iraq actually but not a lot. Several hundred were there as specialists. I'm not fully aware of their roles in Iraq. There is several thousand Canadians in Afghanistan right now but I believe over the next year many of them will be leaving but that may change.

In terms of combat I doubt that Canadians were near the front lines in Iraq. So Canadians did not directly harm anyone in Iraq. I was for us sending troops there and I know that the military in general wanted to go but we had limited resources and our Quebec controlled federal government had to defer to France and say no. I would like very much for Canadians to regain control over their country again.



posted on Feb, 16 2004 @ 07:52 AM
link   
TheNeo: "I have to keep asking who cares? Saddam is gone, gas is still available to the middle class to fill their SUV's. The Israeli's feel safer, all those oil companies will make more money, all kinds of people got jobs, and we kicked some raghead butts too!"

First off, what's this WE bullcrap? Canada did nothing, we had NO troops there, we had NO specialists, NOTHING. YOU certainly didn't do anything.

Secondly, raghead is a racist term, same as calling a black person a 'n-word'. As soon as I can figure out how to I'm reporting you to a Mod.

"I was for us sending troops there and I know that the military in general wanted to go but we had limited resources and our Quebec controlled federal government had to defer to France and say no. I would like very much for Canadians to regain control over their country again. "

Funny thing, 80% of people ACROSS THE COUNTRY didn't want to go. The pollsters were working overtime and every poll said that the Canadian public did not want to get involved in and illegal and unjust war in Iraq. And lo and behold we didn't go, because it's called Democracy, and having your government do what your people TELL them to do.


jakomo



posted on Feb, 16 2004 @ 10:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jakomo

And lo and behold we didn't go, because it's called Democracy, and having your government do what your people TELL them to do.

jakomo



Very funny. Very very funny.

So I guess that your " democratic government who's doing what their peoples are asking him to do " is gonna give his independance to Quebec ?



posted on Feb, 16 2004 @ 10:47 AM
link   
ultra Phoenix: "Very funny. Very very funny.

So I guess that your " democratic government who's doing what their peoples are asking him to do " is gonna give his independance to Quebec ?"


I don't get it. We had a referendum to do with Quebec separation and the people voted against it so it didn't happen.

I don't quite get what you're implying.


j



posted on Feb, 16 2004 @ 10:53 AM
link   
if i were you canadians id let quebeq seperate, then you invade and make them speak english! stupid french people



posted on Feb, 16 2004 @ 12:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jakomo

I don't get it. We had a referendum to do with Quebec separation and the people voted against it so it didn't happen.

I don't quite get what you're implying.


j


You don't get it ?
The Canadian government did allmost everything to depict Quebec indepandentist as a bunch of cranks and racist peoples. So, of course, the peoples voted " no ". Talk about a referendum....

It's like when Ireland voted " no " to the EU referendum. What did the Irish gov ? Just a new referendum ( why ? They didn't like the first one ???? ), but this time with an heavy propaganda. So, OF COURSE, Iraland " joined " the EU. Your government, like ALL the governments in the world, don't care about us. Then don't think that you're living in a democracy.


Originally posted by KrazyIvan
stupid french people

I speak french you stupid english speaking guy.



posted on Feb, 16 2004 @ 12:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jakomo
TheNeo: "I have to keep asking who cares? Saddam is gone, gas is still available to the middle class to fill their SUV's. The Israeli's feel safer, all those oil companies will make more money, all kinds of people got jobs, and we kicked some raghead butts too!"

First off, what's this WE bullcrap? Canada did nothing, we had NO troops there, we had NO specialists, NOTHING. YOU certainly didn't do anything.

Secondly, raghead is a racist term, same as calling a black person a 'n-word'. As soon as I can figure out how to I'm reporting you to a Mod.

"I was for us sending troops there and I know that the military in general wanted to go but we had limited resources and our Quebec controlled federal government had to defer to France and say no. I would like very much for Canadians to regain control over their country again. "

Funny thing, 80% of people ACROSS THE COUNTRY didn't want to go. The pollsters were working overtime and every poll said that the Canadian public did not want to get involved in and illegal and unjust war in Iraq. And lo and behold we didn't go, because it's called Democracy, and having your government do what your people TELL them to do.


jakomo



I frankly don't care what you think man because you are from Quebec and thus you are not a Canadian.



posted on Feb, 16 2004 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by THENEO

I frankly don't care what you think man because you are from Quebec and thus you are not a Canadian.


What's wrong with you THENEO ? Did you forget to take your xanax this morning ?
man, you're looking so nervous.


[Edited on 16-2-2004 by ultra_phoenix]





 
0
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join