 |
reply posted on 13-2-2006 @ 09:01 PM by ahnikah
|
Originally posted by apc
Haha, perhaps.
If those are sockets it must be Sloth buried up there.
"Heeeey youuuu guuuuys!!" 
*chuckle*
I'm not unwilling to laugh at the idea
I'm just trying to bring something interesting to the forum.
If I wasn't a "skeptic believer" I woudn't have put it out here for a possible debunking.
Edit to fix spelling error
[edit on 13-2-2006 by ahnikah]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-2-2006 @ 12:38 AM by SteveR
|
Well, the proportions are all correct for a head.. amazing really.. but it's not exactly like a skull.. a skull would have hollow cheeks, ya know? I
think if it was a dead humanoid it would look more like a skull, and it doesn't.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-2-2006 @ 09:00 AM by SHHCAGO
|
It would be awesome if it was discovered that other humans existed on planets. I was thinking last nite "what if" each planet is moving down the
line, and each of the known planets once was where Earth is right now, and somehow just got pushed out of orbit farther and farther away from the
sun.... Just a fantasy!!!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-2-2006 @ 10:30 AM by ahnikah
|
Damocles:
Maybe someone should bring it to his attention
I KNOW he'd do an impartial investigative report
[edited to reduce big quote, try to use smaller quotes, or try not to quote the entire post and make a general response -nygdan]
[edit on 17-2-2006 by Nygdan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-2-2006 @ 11:04 AM by ahnikah
|
Damocles:
Any chance you could put up your picture that resulted from this, please? I'd like to see what someone with a little more experience with photo
programs came out with.
[edited to reduce big quote, try to use smaller quotes, or try not to quote the entire post and make a general response -nygdan]
[edit on 17-2-2006 by Nygdan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-2-2006 @ 11:28 AM by Nygdan
|
The mars pics have for a long time now been something of a rorshach test. For a very long time people seriously talking about martian bunnies,
coral-sponges, petrified wood, and all sorts of things.
The face is darned neat and a good find! Keep looking! However, I don't see why anyone should take any of these things more seriously than they take
the images that they see in the clouds.
The blueberries are damned neat too! Things just like them exist on earth also.
Originally posted by lonewolf37
seem way too semetrical to be natural. 
Nature very often produces incredibly symetrical things.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-6-2006 @ 11:15 PM by Stari
|
Great image!! I have one too
ahnikah, great image. The face even has ears. Wow... That is one to add to my collection of anomalous images.
I found this image with a face statue in it.
When I found this image.. I freaked out.
What do you guys think?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-6-2006 @ 11:35 PM by Umbra Sideralis
|
maybe some one in the NASA roover program have a high pitch dark humor, and programed the machine to make small faces all over the place in the spare
times,,,lol like a classical ode for the so famous and debated "face of mars", lol
Now for real, i think it is just a terrible coicidence product of our imagination, rocks and light/shadows!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2006 @ 12:56 AM by Toadmund
|
The Russians did it:
external image
external image
Preserving the heritage.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-6-2006 @ 12:32 AM by Stari
|
The russians did what? I guess I dont get that.. was that a joke?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-6-2006 @ 08:29 PM by ProveIt
|
I'm afraid its nothing ot get excited over. If you look carefully, it's just a rock with a bunch of those pebbles fit in a convinient pattern. It
does look cool though.
However, what are those round rock pebbles anyway? I see them in all amrs pictures, and they're blue in the color shots. Anyone know?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2008 @ 08:54 AM by vze2xjjk
|
[post removed]
www.abovetopsecret.com...
 1h.) Spamming: You will not post identical content, or snippets of identical content, to multiple threads in the discussion forums. 
[edit on 18-3-2008 by 12m8keall2c]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-3-2008 @ 05:28 PM by vze2xjjk
|
reply to post by spacedoubt
I could tell in a flash that that was a rear hazcam shot and the overhead curved mirror was one of my designs for the dual purpose of hazard avoidance
and life spotting.It works also after the fact to defeat nasa masking of images because they forget to look up many times and some fuzzy faces appera
from seemingly out of nowhere(while they are erased at ground level).
Now compare a straight-on pic,non-distorted,non-reflected to
compare(female)middle aged.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-3-2008 @ 06:43 PM by vze2xjjk
|
reply to post by teleporter
That's one of the most interesting fossils.I see other fossils around it using negative,then masked LIVE animals looking at the camera.Theres also a
live animal overlapping the original fossil in positive,but most people see rocks so I'll wait on that. Look for a snake looking upwards.That's the
LIVE one.The rest are fossils(?)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-3-2008 @ 07:51 PM by MrPenny
|

reply to post by vze2xjjk
What in the hell is all of that supposed to be?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-3-2008 @ 10:18 PM by FreeThinkerIdealist
|
This is what I think of ...
credit for these following photos go to the movie Total Recall and the respective sites that are hosting them (found from a windows live
search)
(from here )
(from here )
(from here )
Eerily similar, even if it is just shadows and rocks. I see the same downturned mouth, two nostrils properly spaced above the mouth, either a strong
brow or bulging eyes, an ear with the proper outer shape and even an inner form. Remarkably similar. I would go for a leathered face from a
weathered grave very easily.
To consider that if there was a past civilization, it could have met a horrible end many thousands of years ago ... just think how little of us would
be left in a global nuclear war and 10-20,000 years of erosion and corrosion. Not much, to be honest.
No, not saying this is a human like creature (or we are escaped Martians), or that such a past existed, but, I keep my mind open to possibilities
beyond what the average 'scientist' believes, since they don't have much more evidence than the rest of us, just a piece of paper, and science is
proved wrong consistently through history
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 11:30 PM by porky1981
|
it looks like sloth from the goonies...
strange nonetheless... good find.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2008 @ 07:52 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
if you look at the left of the face there is another face looking directly to it (sideways), its nose is white.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-6-2008 @ 03:34 AM by vze2xjjk
|
reply to post by MrPenny
That is a Mars WOMAN and MAN next to each other looking at Spirit rover. I can recognize patterns in pics of faces mostly humanoid and animal.I look
for symetry.I outlined the Mars Man and Woman side by side.Plus the common animal near her left shoulder is a caterpillar style animal,so common on
Mars,possibly her pet or friend. You have to concentrate to be able to see the man's face. I started from the mere smallest detail in the top pics
and colorized them. I saw them 2004,and many other Mars people.
Or here's the coloring book version for the rock people.
I forgot to mention that she is resting her chin in
hand,obscuring the chin line. My guess is she' under 5 ft tall and around 100 lbs Earth weight,or less.She looks in her 30's/40's compared to Earth
women .If this doesn't show you life on Mars you can wait a few years and try later. I'm hoping nasa will show what's on Mars by 2020,but I'm
overly optimistic about govertnment/military agencies who have a non-disclosure policy for employees who face JAIL/IMPRISONMENT/TOTAL LOSS OF
FREEDOM/LOSS OF CAREER/FINES for going public for what they know.That's called a GAG order. Nasa masks images of life on Mars. You are seeing what
nasa wants no-one to see or know about. Your taxes paid for it. Your educational establishments will be the last to know and tell you about life on
Mars. I had to unlearn what I was taught about space and Mars. They lie about even the color of the sky.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-6-2008 @ 10:37 AM by vze2xjjk
|
Here are those top 2 again. Humanoid on Mars.
The Neg pics highlight different animals "in the way"
from other frames because the frames overlap to form a composite.In other words,by emphasizing one set of frames rather than others you can
de-emphasize which frames you want to MASK OUT,so Nasa was given,by me , a very nice way to maximize transmission of data by overlapping images,taking
less time by compiling overlaps and less trouble and downtime. Jpeg compression is the way I can get around it. I've shown you more humanoid faces
than Nasa will any time soon from Mars. Wonder why. HMMMMMMMMM(stroke your chin like the Mars lady looking at Spirit rover trying to figure it out).
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |