I heard in the news this morning that Bush managed to avert another "supposed" 9/11 style attack on LA's tallest building after arresting a key Al
Quaeda member in Indonesia recently. Knowing what we know about 9/11 and who was really behind it all, does this mean that he managed to convince
himself not to go ahead with the attack?
I saw on TV today that there is a September 11 movie coming out. Despite almost universal consensus that it is far too soon to bring out a movie on
the subject, it looks as if it will be released all the same. It seems like a very convenient way of spreading the propaganda that the official story
is true. Especially in light of the Charlie Sheen comments, it should prove an effective way to keep the masses in line, just like the alleged
thwarting of an LA attack tried to do.
I heard something about this on the radio. The interesting thing is, the LA mayor claimed that that was the first he'd ever heard about it--years
AFTER this "fact"!
I think the government is trying to justify its spying. That's all it is. I can claim to have stopped someone from blowing up something and claim
that it's because I spied on them and stopped them--and people might actually believe it, even though it wouldn't be true!
Too true! Here the governemnt did the same thing with the introduction of these new terror laws which allow the police to arrest suspects on the
basis of future intent to commit terrorist acts. Just another excuse to target people unjustly in my opinion, however after raids in which 17 people
were arrested, the government justified it by saying the new laws prevented a terrorist attack.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.