It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Style
Originally posted by count zero
What I find to be a little shady is the almost unanimous vote
to ban public smoking in NYC in 2002. Was this a ploy to decrease
smoking so as to prevent a sharp rise in lung cancer victims
in NYC, which would have led to an investigation into the toxic air
quality at ground zero? Or was Bloomburg just protecting public
health?
it depends. when they said to ban public smoking, do they mean specifically inside only buildings or on the street also.
Here in California smoking is already banned inside of public buildings.
Originally posted by count zero
Originally posted by Style
Originally posted by count zero
What I find to be a little shady is the almost unanimous vote
to ban public smoking in NYC in 2002. Was this a ploy to decrease
smoking so as to prevent a sharp rise in lung cancer victims
in NYC, which would have led to an investigation into the toxic air
quality at ground zero? Or was Bloomburg just protecting public
health?
it depends. when they said to ban public smoking, do they mean specifically inside only buildings or on the street also.
Here in California smoking is already banned inside of public buildings.
All public buildings, including restaurants and bars, just like CA.