The New Adolph Hitler !, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 8-2-2006 @ 03:46 PM by Submersible

www.cnn.com...

U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld compared Hugo Chavez to Adolf Hitler and warned darkly Thursday about populist leadership in Bolivia and Cuba.

"They are right to be worried, because they know what's happening here," Chavez said in a speech lasting more than 21/2 hours after accepting his prize.

"They will forever try to preserve the U.S. empire by all means, while we will do everything possible to shred it."


This populist leader was once a small farmer, and in the upcoming month's the USG is going to add him and his country to our list of "terrorist".

Does it bother any of you Americans that in the very near future the entire population of this country could be treated as terrorist by the rest of the world?
I mean, you don't honestly think we can put a 'tag' on everybody in the world who does not subscribe to THIS government and kill them do ya'?

But since it appears as tho' our government is going to try, ultimately, one side of the equasion must die.

All of the Egyptians had to suffer for Pharaoh's choices, what makes U.S. different?
Are you unable to recognize a 'spirit' that is more than willing to teach U.S. a lesson ?

HERE is an interview he recently had with Ted Coppel.

This man makes Donald Rumsfeld look like the pure spawn of Satan.

Are you ready to suffer for OUR Pharaoh's choices ?

Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.

Mod Edit: New External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 8/2/2006 by Mirthful Me]

[edit on 9-2-2006 by John bull 1]


reply posted on 8-2-2006 @ 09:01 PM by Strangerous
Originally posted by msnevil
So much ignorence. So little Knowledge to go around.

Of course, The US news is only going to focus on either The Extreme positive\Negitive. That comes out from other Nations. (The rest is not news worthy.)

Chavez is "Not" the only leader in South America. But he is the most Vocal agianst the US. And guess who gets reported. (And then gets the backlash.)

Brazil has a marxist type leader, As well as uruguay\Bolivia. And you don't Hear much about them do you?


Sorry could you explain that - are you saying Chavez IS 'like Hitler' because he criticizes the US?

Do you have any links to Chavez's oppression of his own people / restriction of free speech?

I looked and this was what I found:


Chavez`s main successes have not been radical changes to the Economic or social situation here in Venezuela. One theme on which seemingly everyone can agree is the heightened level of public participation in the political processes of Venezuela. In every café, at every Metro station, in every street, you can hear people talking about the political situation in Venezuela. His other major changes include the introduction of "La Ley de Tierras," a liberal land reform law, and "La Ley de Pescas," a major change to the fishing regulations designed to prioritize small scale local fishing over large-scale industrial export fishing. Probably the most dramatic change has been the legalization of small independent television and radio stations, previously called "pirate" stations.

*SNIP*

The fact is that there a numerous complaints that can be made about Chavez's government, including the lack of backbone in terms of neoliberal reforms and the new trend in the government to make deals with the US government, including allowing the previously denied US drug overflights to Colombia. The biggest problem with the opposition movement is that the individual members have allowed the CD to become a monolithic anti-Chavez machine.

(my emphasis) - edited for brevity

From
www.narconews.com... (visit for full story)

What evidence do you have that there's no free speech in Venezuela?



www.abovetopsecret.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow"> Mod Note: Surround your snippet and link to an external source with these new tags:
[ex] --> Begin external source content
[/ex] --> End external source content

Mod Note: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.



[edit on 8-2-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]

[edit on 8-2-2006 by Strangerous]


reply posted on 9-2-2006 @ 01:45 AM by ludaChris
Originally posted by Strangerous
The CIA certainly did put Saddam in power!!

www.representativepress.org...



Yeah that prooves it. You know the Ba'athist coup was peacful right. I'm sure there were some killings and murders but there was no civil war prior to it. The only reason the US welcomed it was because we were worried about Iran more than anything. And Saddam was willing to work with US and then went to war with Iran, and the US of course supported it. Big mistake as we know now. It was known at the time that he was a shady dude who had no problem killing(more or less known in the US as a psychopath, but one the US could use). The CIA had no need to help him come to power, he reached that on his own. He was a General in the Iraqi Military prior to obtaining power. He obviously had some clout in the political arena in Iraq. He was simply a lesser evil at the time.

Here is a history of US relations with Saddam. More of a what went wrong type of deal.
US relations with Saddam
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^