Is there any depth that people will go to
NOT read what an article says?! People will continually
only read and interpret that which
they only want to.
I don't agree with 'most' of this Iraq issue but people...please....the use of word games has got to stop.
Quote:
"The Bush administration fears its ability to win international funds for rebuilding Iraq will be damaged by a strong Congressional push to
require Iraq to repay some of Washington's proposed $US20 billion ($29 billion) grant to the country...........
The target for Iraq's rebuilding costs is about $US60 billion. Signs are emerging in Congress that a deal will need to be struck to require Baghdad
to repay some of the proposed $US20billion in US funding, using Iraq's vast oil reserves"
Is anyone here doubting that Iraq can't pay this once their oil flow really starts cranking? "While the Iraqi oil would produce about $US2.5
billion in revenue this year, by 2005 it could be generating $US20 billion, he said."
These numbers are conservative estiamtes also...I have seen and read numbers in the 30-40 billion a year.'
In respect to this topic, I guess its a matter of unjust or just.....that was the whole reason for bringing this topic to light, right? In such a
case, one could have come up with a far better 'example' to use.....
regards
seekerof 
