It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran may have Nuclear weapon!

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2006 @ 03:43 PM
link   
I know it sounds a little far-fetched but you just have to stand back and think about it.
He doesn't seem bothered with threats from the rest of the world,plus
his main drive is to destroy Israel.
Has close ties with Russia and China who already have the technology they sell them most of their weaponry why not a consignment of nukes?and they have already threatened to launch missiles at the U.K and U.S if attacked. Is it me or does he seem too confident with his stance?
The Russians have been supplying the Iranians since 2000 apparentely its in the Russians best interest.
www.kurdmedia.com...
I know it says Russia does not sell WMDS to Iran but it has the capability to.

[edit on 3-2-2006 by Alien DNA]

[edit on 3-2-2006 by Alien DNA]

[edit on 3-2-2006 by Alien DNA]

[edit on 3-2-2006 by Alien DNA]




posted on Feb, 3 2006 @ 04:12 PM
link   
your not alone in that speculation

here's a article that mentions Rafi Eitan, a reliable Israeli intell guy
(he helped set up Mossad & other agencies),
has a notion that Iran has up to two (2) atomic devices,
they(Iran) are known to have 3-4 of those 3,000 Km. missles,

and on top of that, the Iran President might just start progroms to round up all those young citizens that are grating against the Allyatollas(sp?) & the strict Laws...

see
www.raidersnewsupdate.com...



posted on Feb, 3 2006 @ 05:43 PM
link   
news.bbc.co.uk...

Remember this caused quite a stir about a year ago, and I do not think there was ever a full explanation. Could this have been a test?

Witness report a missle or a gas tank (nuke) bieng dropped from a plane. It was initially reported as near a Nuclear site, but that was later changed to a site over 50 miles away. This story appeared and disapperaed quickly. I agree Iran is much closer than most people would believe.



posted on Feb, 3 2006 @ 09:43 PM
link   
we already do have nuclear bombs which are only 12 KH-55 and probably are in phase of re-engineering.



posted on Feb, 3 2006 @ 09:50 PM
link   
Iran does not have Nuclear Weapons yet, how do I know? Well because Israel has not attacked them yet. Trust me Israel has some of the best intelligence services in the world, In a case as important as this they would make damn sure they knew if Iran has Nuclear Weapons or not



posted on Feb, 4 2006 @ 12:57 AM
link   
Not to mention, possession of a weapon wouldn't make sense in the context of the confidence people equate to a sense of invulnerability. If you possess a nuclear weapon, you don't say, "We will resist, we will continue our nuclear research," etc. You use it for what it's best at - deterrence. You say, "We have possession of a nuclear weapon and are willing to use it if necessary." That would virtually ensure their invulnerability to attack, except perhaps air strikes based on extremely reliable and specific intelligence which would have to be up to date to, potentially, within the hour.

I don't buy the "he's insane so we can't expect him to act like a normal head of state" rationale. I'm not telepathic, so I can't say for certain that he doesn't really want to "wipe Israel off the map," but I can say with relative certainty that he doesn't want to get Iran wiped off the map.



posted on Feb, 4 2006 @ 03:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by AceWombat04
Not to mention, possession of a weapon wouldn't make sense in the context of the confidence people equate to a sense of invulnerability. If you possess a nuclear weapon, you don't say, "We will resist, we will continue our nuclear research," etc. You use it for what it's best at - deterrence. You say, "We have possession of a nuclear weapon and are willing to use it if necessary." That would virtually ensure their invulnerability to attack, except perhaps air strikes based on extremely reliable and specific intelligence which would have to be up to date to, potentially, within the hour.

I don't buy the "he's insane so we can't expect him to act like a normal head of state" rationale. I'm not telepathic, so I can't say for certain that he doesn't really want to "wipe Israel off the map," but I can say with relative certainty that he doesn't want to get Iran wiped off the map.

I think he needs a reason to use them, he's probably trying to goad Israel to make the first move or something.



posted on Feb, 4 2006 @ 07:30 AM
link   
Ok, the unexplained explosion is extremely interesting, but would it seriously not be very obvious if it was nuclear in nature?

I mean....mushroom cloud, big radius of destruction, radiation?

Anyway....that article (original post) was from 2000, last I hear Russia doesn't even want to sell s-300s to Iran, and if that's the case - once us stealth bombers come in, they're screwed.

They need a lot of s-400s and a lot of tanks as well as something which will shoot and kill ships far far away if they are going to successfully fight this war.

I also share the opinion that if Iran had a nuke they would have already used it on Israel.



posted on Feb, 4 2006 @ 08:21 AM
link   
www.theaustralian.news.com.au...


THis is another leak about testing that may have occured. He is waiting, just as NK is doing, for an attack. He doesn ot want to be the agressor, but the defender. it will look better in the world community.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join