It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Funny thing is that the most arrogant person I talked to out there was an engineer who thought he knew everything.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
I've talked to hundreds of pilots. I spent 25 years working on their planes. And almost none of them were as arrogant as you claim they are. Not even the fighter pilots.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Of course it can't.
Originally posted by C0bzz
What if an Airforce pilot has a degree in Aerospace Engineering?
Like I said, you fly boys crack me up.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
Just out of interest sake Burns you elude to the fact that no one is perfect and in that imperfection is it not possible that the SR-71 could do more (not saying how much, but not 14 mach) then 3.2 mach? I'm sure the danger goes up exponentially after crossing that point but the fact is that sometimes engineers are so good (ego boost for yeah ) that they over design planes better then they imagined or calculated.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
On a side note I enjoy that fact we are all arguing over 0.3 mach lol. As long as all my friends on here realize we still are on the same page and the 90% of the time we agree I think this thread could be interesting.
[edit on 22-12-2008 by Canada_EH]
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
I know that fighter pilots, wearing g-suits, train extensively to handle the g forces. The pull of 4 or 5 g's can present a "very difficult environment' in which to function. What sort of training could possibly be offered to pilots to learn to cope with 14 g's? Do we really train our pilots to fly while unconscious?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You really can't accept that sometimes an aircraft can do things that engineers claim it can't do can you?