This topic is in the Weaponry discussion forum.  (rss)


ABL: A Swiss Army knife?




Topic started on 2-2-2006 @ 12:53 AM by NWguy83


I would like to start off by apologizing, I am not a member of DefenseDaily.Com so I can't provide a link. I pulled this off of another military forum that I am a member of (classified). Anyway, this sounds interesting and I hope they do make it a bit more 'flexible'.




With a few upgrades, the program office believes ABL could expand its capabilities. For example, with upgrades now in progress for its acquisition, tracking and wave front- control hardware and software, ABL could engage longer-range threats such as ICBMs.

Continuing current efforts to upgrade acquisition and tracking sensors and software would allow ABL to track post-engagement debris, providing information to terminal defenses and warnings to friendly locations.

Upgrades to sensors, battle management and tracking software would allow ABL not only to defend itself, but other high-value airborne assets against Surface-to-Air missiles (SAMS), AAMs, and threat aircraft.

By upgrading the acquisition sensor and software ABL could also defend against high altitude cruise missiles. The future could also see ABL offer "a degree of capability" to destroy low-flying cruise missiles, leveraging ABL's speed-of-light capability to respond to time-sensitive targets. Other things ABL could do would be to positively identify potential airborne threats hundreds of miles away by redesigning its active ranging system (ARS); serve as an additional Electronic Support Measures (ESM) platform with some hardware and software modifications and weight reduction; and perform as a communications relay node with some upgrades, to leverage its planned operational altitude and long loiter times.



mod edit: changed to external quote



[edit on 2-2-2006 by UK Wizard]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-3-2006 @ 08:03 AM by urmomma158


do u have any links



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-3-2006 @ 12:57 PM by Wembley


The ABL program is in big trouble, having been downgraded to 'technology demonstrator'. Clearly it's doomed - chemical lasers are rapidly being overtaken - but given the $billions involved I can see why people are thrashing around trying to keep it going.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-3-2006 @ 02:16 PM by urmomma158


what do u mean ovetaken do u mean by fre elctron lasers or solid state or hpm/emp weapons could u verify that chemical lasers may be large but they're the only ones that can reach megawatt levls so solid state can do that



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-3-2006 @ 04:55 PM by justin_barton3


the ABL sounds like a great idea to me. But from what i know of lasers, it sounds expensive, impracticle and should be left for another decade or more till it is cheaper, more efficient and more powerful.

Justin

edit: spelling

[edit on 11-3-2006 by justin_barton3]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)
















ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.062 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread