Challenge to WTC Buldings #1,2, & 7 Implosion Detonation Technicians...

...or whatever you're called.

If there were demolitions/implosions experts that set the charges, knowing that those explosives were sitting under the butts of U.S. Citizens, might they want to come clean?

If you were one would you? I know I'd take the secret that I had a hand in the destruction of thousands of peoples lives to the grave with me. Do you think that these people will be well respected after they tell their little story?

I dunno. At minimum, out of how many men would it take to do it, and have 1,2, or 3 people that could give "concrete" proof come forward with their evidence. The public might look to the higher up's to blame...ie the people that 'orchestrated' it.

In my own mind, I WILL forgive ANYONE that comes forward with irrefutable proof.

or, to just 'get it off their chest'.

What if the people who actually did the explosion placement thought they were doing other construction work? Like what has been theorized by some that unsuspecting people could think they are doing something else. I don't think I'm communicating this correctly but do you understand what I'm trying to say?

[edit on 1-2-2006 by Griff]

You have to consider the possibility that they didn't even know they were setting explosives. Explosives could be disguised as any number of things, from spray-on fireproofing slurry, to "cable upgrades" within the columns, to big boxes laying around in certain rented-out and off-limits offices. You know what I mean?

And of course it would be one less thing for the perpetrators to worry about if the explosives were disguised in such a manner, and wouldn't be that much more work to accomplish.

What kind of construction? Wiring TNT in a column of solid concrete. I'd ask questions abouth that if I was setting them.

The inner core columns were not solid concrete for one thing. Another thing is if you do construction work you're really not going to question your superior who tells you to wire cable upgrades.

Originally posted by bsbray11
You have to consider the possibility that they didn't even know they were setting explosives. Explosives could be disguised as any number of things, from spray-on fireproofing slurry, to "cable upgrades" within the columns, to big boxes laying around in certain rented-out and off-limits offices. You know what I mean?

And of course it would be one less thing for the perpetrators to worry about if the explosives were disguised in such a manner, and wouldn't be that much more work to accomplish.

OK, so has there ever been any mock exercises in the building using say....K9 dogs. Wouldn't they go ape just setting foot in the place?

I know I just contradicted myself, but I was mainly referencing the point about plastering it on the ceiling.

If they used thermite (thermate), I wouldn't think so. Thermite is iron oxide (rust) and aluminum powder. Thermate has sulfer added. K-9 dogs are trained to smell nitrogen compositions (what most bombs are). My question would be, can a bomb sniffing dog detect C-4? Probably, because isn't C-4 made with nitrates of some sort?

OK, point is - If anyone wants to get anything off their conscience, it might be nice to hear about it. And see where we can go from there.

Even if explosives were set that dogs could detect, bomb-sniffing dogs were removed the Thursday before the attacks. Not all of them would have to be removed to get the job done without inconvenience, either, but only the ones around the area you'd be working.

I doubt that they guys that set them up even knew what they were doing, unless it was some kind of special military crack team. But even then, I doubt the dudes would have any definite idea as to what exactly they were doing. It wouldn't be "need to know" information.

[edit on 1-2-2006 by bsbray11]

This thread has gotten a little off topic from the main point. I've just seen this new 911 Documentary, and it made me want to bring this thread up again. That movie was very thought provoking

This thread has kinda gone along the lines of trying to 'prove' the fact that explosives were actually in place before 09/11/2001. This debate belongs on other threads.

I started this thread so anyone can apologize, ask for forgiveness, and tell their side of it. I feel like ATS would be "the" forum to disclose such information. A death-bed confession on here might be the ticket to getting the truth out.

If the theory of bombs in the buildings beforehand, flight 93 being shot down, or if a missle hit the Pentagon, are true, then there has to be evidence that can be made available. SOMEONE would have proof SOMEWHERE.

Originally posted by mooonhoxe
If there were demolitions/implosions experts that set the charges, knowing that those explosives were sitting under the butts of U.S. Citizens, might they want to come clean?

O, that´s simple.

"Look, see this? (shows picture) This is your 4 year old being dropped off to school by your wife yesterday. If you would like to see them in continued good health, you will listen to this man and fully cooperate. You are never to tell about this operation to anyone, or there will be concequences, understood?"

(Nods his head in awe)

Now to be sure, most of the specialists who worked together with semi-government operatives have been or are scheduled to be silenced. The permanent way that is...

Any demolition experts die between 2001-present? Accidental deaths you think?

Would be a nice start for an ATS Research project, wouldn´t it?

9/11: The Way It Could Have Happened