It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rebel_Lion
Hes simply pointing out, in a colourful manner, that Western aid supports their intrest in that particular region. Oil for Aid programms and such, they don't just help anyone its very well thought out.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
the saddest part is the main reasons for the lack of international urgency to help are mostly racism and ignorance.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
there are some countries that have natural resources to export, but most of them don't. No oil, no aid I guess.
Originally posted by Hamburglar
Originally posted by Rebel_Lion
Hes simply pointing out, in a colourful manner, that Western aid supports their intrest in that particular region. Oil for Aid programms and such, they don't just help anyone its very well thought out.
WOW! It seems like no matter what I write, I am doomed to have this regurgitated back to me.
I will try once more, and I will be as specific as I can.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
the saddest part is the main reasons for the lack of international urgency to help are mostly racism and ignorance.
Okay, so here he writes that racism and ignorance are the main reasons for the lack of international urgency.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
there are some countries that have natural resources to export, but most of them don't. No oil, no aid I guess.
Here he immediately follows up by suggesting that lack of oil is the main reason for the lack of international urgency.
What I am asking is for him to decide or clarify. Is it racism? Is it ignorance? Is it lack of oil?
I get what he is attempting to say about oil; I want to know how racism/ignorance factors in. It doesn’t make sense when you’re talking about a profit margin.
Please don’t tell me about the oil again. I get it!
Originally posted by Hamburglar
Originally posted by Rebel_Lion
Hes simply pointing out, in a colourful manner, that Western aid supports their intrest in that particular region. Oil for Aid programms and such, they don't just help anyone its very well thought out.
WOW! It seems like no matter what I write, I am doomed to have this regurgitated back to me.
I will try once more, and I will be as specific as I can.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
the saddest part is the main reasons for the lack of international urgency to help are mostly racism and ignorance.
Okay, so here he writes that racism and ignorance are the main reasons for the lack of international urgency.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
there are some countries that have natural resources to export, but most of them don't. No oil, no aid I guess.
Here he immediately follows up by suggesting that lack of oil is the main reason for the lack of international urgency.
What I am asking is for him to decide or clarify. Is it racism? Is it ignorance? Is it lack of oil?
I get what he is attempting to say about oil; I want to know how racism/ignorance factors in. It doesn’t make sense when you’re talking about a profit margin.
Please don’t tell me about the oil again. I get it!
Originally posted by Souljah
Excuse me, but how far did the Arab Colonizers go? Did they Colonize America, Australia, Asia and entire continent of Africa? How can their Trade with Slaves from Africa be compared to the White Man's SUPERMACY over this Planet as a whole?
If you take Northern America for Example - what was the ONLY reason for the Economic boom? It was the CHEAP labour forces (Slaves from Africa)
that worked on the Vast Cotton Plantantions (STOLEN from Native Indians) - which made an Excellent Economic Combination, that boosted the Economy of the Newly formed American Empire.
Can you show me a Similar comparison in the Muslim World?
Zimbabwean Whites, although making up less than 1% of the population, owned more than 70% of the arable land, comprising mainly the best.
One can not expect that such countries would Blossom at the second that they gain Independance on one way or another.
Zimbabwe is therefore caught in the Vicious Circle of its own Poverty and it can not get out.
They face a wide variety of difficult economic Problems as they struggle to consolidate and upgrade their progress in the modern market-oriented economy.
They face a Shortage of foreign exchange, soaring inflation (586% in 2005), and supply shortages.
Badly needed support from the IMF has been suspended because of the country's failure to meet budgetary goals.
The impact of land reform [emphasis added by Strangecraft] in Zimbabwe has badly damaged the ability of the commercial farming sector to gain foreign exchange.
So, what do you Suggest Herr Doctor we do to help the Nations and Nationalities of Africa?
Originally posted by Souljah
If you take Northern America for Example - what was the ONLY reason for the Economic boom? It was the CHEAP labour forces (Slaves from Africa) that worked on the Vast Cotton Plantantions (STOLEN from Native Indians) - which made an Excellent Economic Combination, that boosted the Economy of the Newly formed American Empire.
Can you show me a Similar comparison in the Muslim World?
Originally posted by AceOfBase
It's time to stop putting all of the blame for Africa on the Europeans.
Originally posted by marg6043
The blame game is what is keeping other countries in world for taking responsibility for the millions of people from Africa that has become victims under invasion, exploitation and slavery.
Somebody has to take responsibility.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
*Mod edit* you must be fun at a party
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
again, you read the original post , and all you can think to do is argue semantics ? I 'd say your illustrating my point for me
Originally posted by Rebel_Lion
Going in circles.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
The EU and US have already taken responsibility for their part of African history but they are the only ones. Look at the donations to that region and tell me how many muslim countries you see donating money.
Originally posted by Rebel_Lion
If you take Northern America for Example - what was the ONLY reason for the Economic boom? It was the CHEAP labour forces (Slaves from Africa)
Its is obvious that slavery was the reason for the economic boom in Europe, thats long been established. Barclays, HSBC and many other companies profited so much so that they cannot afford to repay their debt to us...
Yes the indians of the EAST did and I'm sure still do have cotton plantations, watch the film Ghandi. Its stifled nothing and again boosted the industry of America. When the North abolished slavery the south refused to do so because of the money and convienience of having slaves. If it stifled the industry they wouldn't have continued or even started it in the first place.
Englands part in the slave trade was one of insurance, shipping etc.
Medical Aid Agency Highlights Media Silence On Humanitarian Crises
Conflicts in Africa and global shortcomings in confronting the ravages of AIDS dominated a list published Thursday by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) of the most underreported humanitarian stories of 2005.
The list highlighted the lack of media attention paid to the human cost of fighting in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), northern Uganda and the Ivory Coast and unrelenting crises in Somalia and southern Sudan...
Conflicts in Africa and global shortcomings in confronting the ravages of AIDS dominated a list published Thursday by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) of the most underreported humanitarian stories of 2005. The list highlighted the lack of media attention paid to the human cost of fighting in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), northern Uganda and the Ivory Coast and unrelenting crises in Somalia and southern Sudan...
According to Andrew Tyndall, publisher of the online media-tracking journal The Tyndall Report, the 10 stories highlighted by MSF accounted for just eight minutes of the more than 240 hours of nightly newscasts on the three US television networks in 2005.
In a year dominated by the war in Iraq and the Asian tsunami, only six minutes were devoted to conflicts in DR Congo and Chechnya. The remaining stories highlighted by MSF were not covered at all
"People all over the US tell us how much they want to show solidarity and do more to help others in crisis around the world. But how can they when a crisis is virtually invisible?"
The EU and US have already taken responsibility for their part of African history but they are the only ones. Look at the donations to that region and tell me how many muslim countries you see donating money.
Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
Take a look at Ghandi's work and outlook.
While he knew that the UK was responsible for the bulk of his country's suffering, he didn't waste a lot of breath on the past abuses.
Instead, he talked about Indians taking responsibility for Indian prosperity. Making their own salt, weaving their own clothes, etc.
He led his people to achieve independence in a single generation, with a lot fewer casualties than in most wars for independence. And with no IMF loans.
And how?
By focusing on the fact that his people's happiness was their own responsibility.