Iraqi Christian Churches Bombed

www.s fgate.com

Ok that's it, we are really, really, mad now. It was apearantly ok when muslims murdered muslims, but now, oh no, Christians are being targeted. Time to take out the "wup-arse" again. Besides a "journalist" was injured this weekend also. Shame on you terrorist, SHAME.





[edit on 30-1-2006 by thermopolis]
mod edit to shorten link

mod edit: to a less inflammatory title

[edit on 30-1-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]

Unless you are an extremely elderly member of the British royal family you have no business referring to yourself as " we".

And I object to the title of this thread. It's unnecessarily inflammatory.

Yeah. Stop talking about about the terrorists!

Gee I wonder how many Mosques the US Military Forces have Demolished in the Fallujah Campaign. Fallujah is Known as the "City of Mosques" in Iraq. Out of around 200 Mosques and Shrines, 65-70 were completly Demolished.

Hey - and do you remember, when in First Gulf War British Jets dropped two laser Guided Bombs on Fallujah, with Intention to Destroy the Bridge, but hit the CROWDED MARKET INSTEAD, killing somewhere between 50 and 150 People?

Well I guess when such actions are Conducted by the ALLGOOD West, everything is allright and called Counter-Terrorism.

Oh, and Change the Title of this Thread - it IS unnecessarily inflammatory, as mister mulberryblueshimmer said Before me.

I think the thread title is sarcastic, mocking how the media goes mentalo when the attack is on christians not the 'usual' muslim on muslim.

Thank you so much for being a "real" person with a sense of humor. You get the a-bomber award for the month. (Free bomb shelter construction documents and survival plans, including the "how to survive the Iraninan holocost handbook")

[edit on 30-1-2006 by thermopolis]

[edit on 30-1-2006 by thermopolis]

And this has to do with christains?
You going to point out all the stuff the MOD has done wrong to justify terrorist actions and say how wrong the west is?

Yes the MOD has done wrong, yes they did hit civilians, yes they used weapons you dont like but frankly thats war. In GW1 they where there to liberate kuwait from sadamm, but wait thats no justification since after all we created him.

So dammed if we do , dammed if we dont.

It has ALOT to do with Christians, for they are the Ones Dropping Bombs from the Sky and they are the Ones Invading Muslim Lands.


It is not about Justifying Terrorist Actitives, it is to Understand them. For most of the People see Savage Muslim Radicals blowing themselves up - when in fact they are Soldiers, just like Fighter-Bombers pilots that drop 1000 pound bombs almost everyday.

The only Difference between them is the MEANS of Delivery.


Wrong.

GW1 was the War which was an Experiment to see if WARS are still Possible after the fall of the Iron Curtain - the REAL Conflict, was not a war with Iraq over the invasion of Kuwait, but a greater question concerning the concept of war. The first Gulf War served as a crisis point, determining whether or not war was still possible in the post-Industrial, post Cold war age.


No - Actually Just DAMNED.

So sure are you?
Care to explain why muslims are in the UK army?
Care to tell me why there are IMO very few christains in the UK?


Then why not explain about insurgents using suicide bombers, warcrimes and criminals acts?

So your saying that a suicide bomber is just like a british army medic then?
I think not.

There is a BIT of difference, when was the last time you seen the british army place a bomb inside a mans body set it to go off when his family finds the body?


What????/
If that was true then why in all things that are good did we stop at the kuwait border!!!


Actually dammed if we do nothing (Africa?) and dammed if we do (bosnia) tell me just what in gods name do you want us to ?