It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Even considering that how would you think they would stop people from having sex? I mean come on its like one of the basic life instincts just as fighting is.
my next thought was, "Shades of The Matrix!"
Originally posted by sardion2000
Children should not be engineered against their will pre-natally or post-natally, it should be a personal choice that is made by a consenting adult. This smells like Forced Eugenics and is unethical in the extreme. The only types of modifications that should be made without the consent of the child should be those that limit disorders and diseases. I'm all for Human Augmentation as long as it's a personal choice made by a concenting adult. Of course should any of those modification be hereditary then that is different and not forced. Some things should be left up to random chance as we will never know what we might end up with.
There is no stop button in human re-engineering
By Madeleine Bunting
THE GUARDIAN , LONDON
My daughter is 10. Fast forward 25 years, and she is having her first child -- early by the standards of all her friends, but she's keen on "natural." Of course, she did pre-implementation genetic diagnosis, and she and her husband (yes, very old fashioned, they married) had some agonizing days deciding on whether to modify a genetic predisposition to depression and whether to splice in a gene for enhanced intelligence. In the end, they felt they had no option but to give their baby the best possible start in life.
Five years later, my little granddaughter is starting school. Again her parents have talked over the pros and cons of cognitive enhancement. A pharmcogenetic package is now routinely offered on the state medical system after the government decided that, given international competition in the global knowledge economy, there was no option but to ensure the nation's schoolchildren had better powers of memory and concentration. I had my doubts, but I have to admit that my little granddaughter is proving a wonderfully clever creature -- a constant source of amazement to me.
My doubts were in part assuaged by the fact that I had already started stronger doses of the same cognitive enhancement drugs.
Rest Of Story
Children should not be engineered against their will pre-natally or post-natally, it should be a personal choice that is made by a consenting adult.
Originally posted by bodebliss
The only thing we have to fear is lack of imagination and leadership.
The only thing we have to fear is lack of imagination and leadership.
1) every country would have their own space in outer space or on the moon. so essentially, you would have USA-Space, France-Space, England-Space, etc.....
2) there would be an NWO that would control all of earth and all of space. one currency. one main language....possibly one main religion or no religion at all.....
Originally posted by Produkt
What's the problem with genetic therapies that can be used pre-natally to stop any harmfull diseases or cancer's from occuring later in the child's adult life? Are you trying to imply that people might actually want these thing's in their live's?
Originally posted by Sardion2000
The only types of modifications that should be made without the consent of the child should be those that limit disorders and diseases.
Originally posted by Produkt
I for one would do this. If it were possible to give my child a HEALTHY and LONG life without pain and suffering, then I see no reason not to do it. Actually, I find it rather barbaric that anyone would choose to not do it! How selfish and closed minded must you be to decide that it's harmfull to your belief's that if given a chance such as this, you would pass it by! It truly is barbaric. Simple minded. Idiotic.
Life as a whole isn't going to change drasticly. People will keep having sex, it's very pleasurable. Nothing is going to change that!
The only change you'll see is people living longer, healthier live's and being more intelligent then today's world! My my... that truly is unethical isn't it?! Not one person has stated WHY it's unethical beyond they're own belief structure's.
I think the bond between mother and child is also extremely important. Mothers LOVE their children like you couldn't imagine (I say this because from the sound of this thread, you yourself do not have any), part of this reason is that THEY created this life (through love) and have nurtured and cared for it and watched it grow as a part of them. Babies feel this love as well. I think to take that step away from the process is only creating a cold world full of *soldiers* made to fit a piece of a puzzle. We as *normal* humans know how fragile our life is and we tend to value it more because of this. To take all this away.....would just create a world I would not want to live in, or have my children in.