How many do you think it would take to bring the buildings down? 50? 100?200? I would think it would be many, as one large explosion would be quite obvious on the video.
Were they placed beforehand and noone notice these many ownerless suitcases lying around or did the firefighters carry them up with them.
It is easy to make it all sound silly when throwing around the term "suitcase bombs". It sounds silly because the whole concept of miniature bombs has been ridiculed to death, despite its technical feasibility.
However, the point is, non-standard munitions were likely used in WTC. I don't know what size, and I don't know what type, but I am not so stupid as to assume that if I don't know about such explosive devices, that they don't exist.
The question is HOW the devices were placed, and that has been answered because there are contractors going in and out all the time.
There's a debate technique where you reduce the opponent's statement to an absurd sounding one. It's called reductio ad absurdum. It's a weak technique, but it works in group settings like message boards.
The point is, we have WTC (a murder site) falling perfectly into a hole, cooking for two weeks, and then all evidence being totally trucked off the American continent under the strict supervision of FEMA. This indicates that someone wanted the evidence removed.
[edit on 29-1-2006 by smallpeeps]




