It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

mary not a virgin

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2006 @ 08:38 PM
link   
Hello Frinds:

I have read and read and then read some more about this.
I know of sertain books and also tv shows that have talked
about the " THEORY" that Mary was not a Virging. To me that is
all it is a "THEORY" Angel came from heavens and made Mary
pregnat-so the Christ could be born of the inmaculate conseption.




posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 09:15 AM
link   
Amethyst, I think it depends upon which Gospel and which version of the Bible that one reads. Don't forget the Catholic Church "edited" the Bible at the Council of Nicene in the 4th century.

-Forestlady



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 09:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nakash
I'm sure many Catholics don't know Mary had several
children, you should though.


Wrong. There is no biblical proof of any siblings for Christ.

Already debunked on this thread -
www.belowtopsecret.com...



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 06:11 PM
link   
Two of Jesus' half-brothers wrote books of the New Testament. James and Judah.

Furthermore, it says Joseph knew her not until AFTER Jesus was born. It doesn't say he never did it.

Nothing has been debunked. If you're trying to pull the "cousins" thing on me, it won't work.

And there is only one accurate English Bible, and that's the Authorized King James. It's been proven. I have books on it. Don't pay any attention to the other (per)versions.



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 06:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Amethyst
Furthermore, it says Joseph knew her not until AFTER Jesus was born


The quote is 'until' ... not 'after' ... and that is
also addressed on that thread - which obviously
you didn't bother to read.


If all you are going to do is throw around regurgitated
'facts' that dispute the Catholic position, don't bother.
It's all old and it's all been debunked.


I have books on it.


So what? I have just as many, if not more, that say the
exact opposite as yours.


Like I said, it's all old Jack Chickisms and it's all been
said in BTS Religion Forum.


[edit on 2/7/2006 by FlyersFan]



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 10:41 PM
link   
Sure, it is the most fascinating version I have read, though I have only read two others. But, I have never had it explained to my satisfaction why Joseph's lineage is included. If he wasn't the father, what is it doing in there?



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join